selector of an Objective-C method declaration, e.g., given
- (int)first:(int)x second:(int)y;
this code completion point triggers at the location of "second". It
will provide completions that fill out the method declaration for any
known method, anywhere in the translation unit.
llvm-svn: 107929
allows Sema some limited access to the current scope, which we only
use in one way: when Sema is performing some kind of declaration that
is not directly driven by the parser (e.g., due to template
instantiatio or lazy declaration of a member), we can find the Scope
associated with a DeclContext, if that DeclContext is still in the
process of being parsed.
Use this to make the implicit declaration of special member functions
in a C++ class more "scope-less", rather than using the NULL Scope hack.
llvm-svn: 107491
aren't dropping all exception specifications on destructors, the
exception specifications on implicitly-declared destructors were
detected as being wrong (which they were).
Introduce logic to provide a proper exception-specification for
implicitly-declared destructors. This also fixes PR6972.
Note that the other implicitly-declared special member functions also
need to get exception-specifications. I'll deal with that in a
subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 107385
parameters starts at the end of the template-parameter rather than at
the point where the template parameter name is encounted. For example,
given:
typedef unsigned char T;
template<typename T = T> struct X0 { };
The "T" in the default argument refers to the typedef of "unsigned
char", rather than referring to the newly-introduced template type
parameter 'T'.
Addresses <rdar://problem/8122812>.
llvm-svn: 107354
type to an integral or enumeration type in the size of an array new
expression, e.g.,
new int[ConvertibleToInt(10)];
This is a GNU and C++0x extension.
llvm-svn: 107229
enumeration type out into a separate, reusable routine. The only
functionality change here is that we recover a little more
aggressively from ill-formed switch conditions.
llvm-svn: 107222
unimplemented property warning for properties
coming from class's conformin protocol. It also
simplifies the algorithm in the process.
Fixes radar 8035776.
llvm-svn: 107174
This is more targeted, as it simply provides toggle actions for the parser to
turn access checking on and off. We then use these to suppress access checking
only while we parse the template-id (included scope specifier) of an explicit
instantiation and explicit specialization of a class template. The
specialization behavior is an extension, as it seems likely a defect that the
standard did not exempt them as it does explicit instantiations.
This allows the very common practice of specializing trait classes to work for
private, internal types. This doesn't address instantiating or specializing
function templates, although those apparently already partially work.
The naming and style for the Action layer isn't my favorite, comments and
suggestions would be appreciated there.
llvm-svn: 106993
current attribute system, but it is enough to handle class templates which
specify parts of their alignment in terms of their template parameters.
This also replaces the attributes test in SemaTemplate with one that actually
tests working attributes instead of broken ones. I plan to add more tests here
for non-dependent attributes in a subsequent patch.
Thanks to John for walking me through some of this. =D
llvm-svn: 106818
(or operator-function-id) as a template, but the context is actually
non-dependent or the current instantiation, allow us to use knowledge
of what kind of template it is, e.g., type template vs. function
template, for further syntactic disambiguation. This allows us to
parse properly in the presence of stray "template" keywords, which is
necessary in C++0x and it's good recovery in C++98/03.
llvm-svn: 106167
disambiguation keywords outside of templates in C++98/03. Previously,
the warning would fire when the associated nested-name-specifier was
not dependent, but that was a misreading of the C++98/03 standard:
now, we complain only when we're outside of any template.
llvm-svn: 106161
introduced by using decls are hidden even if their template parameter lists
or return types differ from the "overriding" declaration.
Propagate using shadow declarations around more effectively when looking up
template-ids. Reperform lookup for template-ids in member expressions so that
access control is properly set up.
Fix some number of latent bugs involving template-ids with totally invalid
base types. You can only actually get these with a scope specifier, since
otherwise the template-id won't parse as a template-id.
Fixes PR7384.
llvm-svn: 106093
being a subsequence of another standard conversion sequence. Instead
of requiring exact type equality for the second conversion step,
require type *similarity*, which is type equality with cv-qualifiers
removed at all levels. This appears to match the behavior of EDG and
VC++ (albeit not GCC), and feels more intuitive. Big thanks to John
for the line of reasoning that supports this change: since
cv-qualifiers are orthogonal to the second conversion step, we should
ignore them in the type comparison.
llvm-svn: 105678
or block-pointer type by removing the qualifiers parameter. Introduce a
method to perform semantic checking when adding qualifiers to a type.
llvm-svn: 105526
type that we expect to see at a given point in the grammar, e.g., when
initializing a variable, returning a result, or calling a function. We
don't prune the candidate set at all, just adjust priorities to favor
things that should type-check, using an ultra-simplified type system.
llvm-svn: 105128
that is missing the 'template' keyword, e.g.,
t->getAs<T>()
where getAs is a member of an unknown specialization. C++ requires
that we treat "getAs" as a value, but that would fail to parse since T
is the name of a type. We would then fail at the '>', since a type
cannot be followed by a '>'.
This is a very common error for C++ programmers to make, especially
since GCC occasionally allows it when it shouldn't (as does Visual
C++). So, when we are in this case, we use tentative parsing to see if
the tokens starting at "<" can only be parsed as a template argument
list. If so, we produce a diagnostic with a fix-it that states that
the 'template' keyword is needed:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:5:8: error: 'template' keyword
is required to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
t->getAs<T>();
^
template
This is just a start of this patch; I'd like to apply the same
approach to everywhere that a template-id with dependent template name
can be parsed.
llvm-svn: 104406
the same .cpp file as provided the definitions referenced these functions,
hiding the issue. However, they are clearly no longer inline. Let me know if
there is a reason to move their definitions to the header and make them truly
inline.
llvm-svn: 104104
design limitation in how we handle Objective-C class extensions. This was causing the CursorVisitor
to essentially visit an @property twice (once in the @interface, the other in the class extension).
Fixes <rdar://problem/7410145>.
llvm-svn: 104055
consider "super" as a candidate whenever we're parsing an expression
within an Objective-C method in an interface that has a superclass. At
some point, we'd like to give "super" a little edge over non-local
names; that will come later.
llvm-svn: 104022
return value optimization. Sema marks return statements with their
NRVO candidates (which may or may not end up using the NRVO), then, at
the end of a function body, computes and marks those variables that
can be allocated into the return slot.
I've checked this locally with some debugging statements (not
committed), but there won't be any tests until CodeGen comes along.
llvm-svn: 103865
user directive is needed to force a property implementation.
It is decided based on those propeties which are declared in
the class (or in its protocols) but not those which must be
default implemented by one of its super classes. Implements radar 7923851.
llvm-svn: 103787
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions.
The new scheme:
- For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
to/through a virtual base class, etc.
- For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
- For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
member functions when needed.
- At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
vtables lazily).
From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).
Notes:
(1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
the larger tests from these issues.
(2) Some diagnostics related to
implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
way.
(3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
vtable.
Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.
llvm-svn: 103718
member function (default constructor, copy constructor, copy
assignment operator, destructor), emit a note showing where that
implicit definition was required.
llvm-svn: 103619
Douglas Gregor