which can refer to static data members, enumerators, and member
functions as well as to non-static data members.
Implement correct lvalue computation for member references in C++.
Compute the result type of non-static data members of reference type properly.
llvm-svn: 61294
become useful or correct until we (1) parse template arguments
correctly, (2) have some way to turn template-ids into types,
declarators, etc., and (3) have a real representation of templates.
llvm-svn: 61208
warning: statement was disambiguated as declaration
because it is currently firing in cases where the declaration would
not actually parse as a statement. We'd love to bring this warning
back if we can make it more accurate.
llvm-svn: 61137
is completely defined (C++ [class.mem]p2).
Reverse the order in which we process the definitions of member
functions specified inline. This way, we'll get diagnostics in the
order in which the member functions were declared in the class.
llvm-svn: 61103
N::X only skips those entities specified in C++ [basic.lookup.qual]p1.
Note that both EDG and GCC currently get this wrong. EDG has confirmed
that the bug will be fixed in a future version.
llvm-svn: 61079
functions. They work except that name lookup within the default
arguments needs to be deferred until the class definition is complete
(see FIXME in the test).
llvm-svn: 61059
specifiers. Specifically:
* Determine when an out-of-line function definition does not match
any declaration within the class or namespace (including coping
with overloaded functions).
* Complain about typedefs and parameters that have scope specifiers.
* Complain about out-of-line declarations that aren't also
definitions.
* Complain about non-static data members being declared out-of-line.
* Allow cv-qualifiers on out-of-line member function definitions.
llvm-svn: 61058
just like all other members, and remove the special variables in
CXXRecordDecl to store them. This eliminates a lot of special-case
code for constructors and destructors, including
ActOnConstructor/ActOnDeclarator and special lookup rules in
LookupDecl. The result is far more uniform and manageable.
Diagnose the redeclaration of member functions.
llvm-svn: 61048
the type of the enumeration once the enumeration has been defined.
Fix the overloading test-case to properly create enums that promote
the way we want them to.
Implement C++0x promotions from enumeration types to long
long/unsigned long long. We're using these promotions in Carbon.h
(since long long is a common extension).
Fixes PR clang/2954: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2954
llvm-svn: 60917
and separates lexical name lookup from qualified name lookup. In
particular:
* Make DeclContext the central data structure for storing and
looking up declarations within existing declarations, e.g., members
of structs/unions/classes, enumerators in C++0x enums, members of
C++ namespaces, and (later) members of Objective-C
interfaces/implementations. DeclContext uses a lazily-constructed
data structure optimized for fast lookup (array for small contexts,
hash table for larger contexts).
* Implement C++ qualified name lookup in terms of lookup into
DeclContext.
* Implement C++ unqualified name lookup in terms of
qualified+unqualified name lookup (since unqualified lookup is not
purely lexical in C++!)
* Limit the use of the chains of declarations stored in
IdentifierInfo to those names declared lexically.
* Eliminate CXXFieldDecl, collapsing its behavior into
FieldDecl. (FieldDecl is now a ScopedDecl).
* Make RecordDecl into a DeclContext and eliminates its
Members/NumMembers fields (since one can just iterate through the
DeclContext to get the fields).
llvm-svn: 60878
"else" clause, e.g.,
if (int X = foo()) {
} else {
if (X) { // warning: X is always zero in this context
}
}
Fixes rdar://6425550 and lets me think about something other than
DeclContext.
llvm-svn: 60858
template<typename T> void f(T x) {
g(x); // g is a dependent name, so don't even bother to look it up
g(); // error: g is not a dependent name
}
Note that when we see "g(", we build a CXXDependentNameExpr. However,
if none of the call arguments are type-dependent, we will force the
resolution of the name "g" and replace the CXXDependentNameExpr with
its result.
GCC actually produces a nice error message when you make this
mistake, and even offers to compile your code with -fpermissive. I'll
do the former next, but I don't plan to do the latter.
llvm-svn: 60618
expressions, and value-dependent expressions. This permits us to parse
some template definitions.
This is not a complete solution; we're missing type- and
value-dependent computations for most of the expression types, and
we're missing checks for dependent types and type-dependent
expressions throughout Sema.
llvm-svn: 60615
specific targets default them to on. Default blocks to on on 10.6 and later.
Add a -fblocks option that allows the user to override the target's default.
Use -fblocks in the various testcases that use blocks.
llvm-svn: 60563
instead of converting them to strings first. This also fixes a
bunch of minor inconsistencies in the diagnostics emitted by clang
and adds a bunch of FIXME's to DiagnosticKinds.def.
llvm-svn: 59948
with implicit quotes around them. This has a bunch of follow-on
effects and requires tweaking to a whole lot of code. This causes
a regression in two tests (xfailed) by causing it to emit things like:
Line 10: duplicate interface declaration for category 'MyClass1' ('Category1')
instead of:
Line 10: duplicate interface declaration for category 'MyClass1(Category1)'
I will fix this in a follow-up commit.
As part of this, I had to start switching stuff to use ->getDeclName() instead
of Decl::getName() for consistency. This is good, but I was planning to do this
as an independent patch. There will be several follow-on patches
to clean up some of the mess, but this patch is already too big.
llvm-svn: 59917
being called to be converted to a reference-to-function,
pointer-to-function, or reference-to-pointer-to-function. This is done
through "surrogate" candidate functions that model the conversions
from the object to the function (reference/pointer) and the
conversions in the arguments.
llvm-svn: 59674
with function call syntax, e.g.,
Functor f;
f(x, y);
This is the easy part of handling calls to objects of class type
(C++ [over.call.object]). The hard part (coping with conversions from
f to function pointer or reference types) will come later. Nobody uses
that stuff anyway, right? :)
llvm-svn: 59663
struct A {
struct B;
};
struct A::B {
void m() {} // Assertion failed: getContainingDC(DC) == CurContext && "The next DeclContext should be lexically contained in the current one."
};
Introduce DeclContext::getLexicalParent which may be different from DeclContext::getParent when nested-names are involved, e.g:
namespace A {
struct S;
}
struct A::S {}; // getParent() == namespace 'A'
// getLexicalParent() == translation unit
llvm-svn: 59650
built-in operator candidates. Test overloading of '&' and ','.
In C++, a comma expression is an lvalue if its right-hand
subexpression is an lvalue. Update Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
llvm-svn: 59643
post-decrement, including support for generating all of the built-in
operator candidates for these operators.
C++ and C have different rules for the arguments to the builtin unary
'+' and '-'. Implemented both variants in Sema::ActOnUnaryOp.
In C++, pre-increment and pre-decrement return lvalues. Update
Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
llvm-svn: 59638
With this snippet:
void f(a::b);
An assert is hit:
Assertion failed: CachedTokens[CachedLexPos-1].getLocation() == Tok.getAnnotationEndLoc() && "The annotation should be until the most recent cached token", file ..\..\lib\Lex\PPCaching.cpp, line 98
Introduce Preprocessor::RevertCachedTokens that reverts a specific number of tokens when backtracking is enabled.
llvm-svn: 59636
not "int".
Fix a typo in the promotion of enumeration types that was causing some
integral promotions to look like integral conversions (leading to
extra ambiguities in overload resolution).
Check for "acceptable" overloaded operators based on the types of the
arguments. This is a somewhat odd check that is specified by the
standard, but I can't see why it actually matters: the overload
candidates it suppresses don't seem like they would ever be picked as
the best candidates.
llvm-svn: 59583
to support operators defined as member functions, e.g.,
struct X {
bool operator==(X&);
};
Overloading with non-member operators is supported, and the special
rules for the implicit object parameter (e.g., the ability for a
non-const *this to bind to an rvalue) are implemented.
This change also refactors and generalizes the code for adding
overload candidates for overloaded operator calls (C++ [over.match.expr]),
both to match the rules more exactly (name lookup of non-member
operators actually ignores member operators) and to make this routine
more reusable for the other overloaded operators.
Testing for the initialization of the implicit object parameter is
very light. More tests will come when we get support for calling
member functions directly (e.g., o.m(a1, a2)).
llvm-svn: 59564
DeclRefExprs and BlockDeclRefExprs into a single function
Sema::ActOnDeclarationNameExpr, eliminating a bunch of duplicate
lookup-name-and-check-the-result code.
Note that we still have the three parser entry points for identifiers,
operator-function-ids, and conversion-function-ids, since the parser
doesn't (and shouldn't) know about DeclarationNames. This is a Good
Thing (TM), and there will be more entrypoints coming (e.g., for C++
pseudo-destructor expressions).
llvm-svn: 59527
operator+, directly, using the same mechanism as all other special
names.
Removed the "special" identifiers for the overloaded operators from
the identifier table and IdentifierInfo data structure. IdentifierInfo
is back to representing only real identifiers.
Added a new Action, ActOnOperatorFunctionIdExpr, that builds an
expression from an parsed operator-function-id (e.g., "operator
+"). ActOnIdentifierExpr used to do this job, but
operator-function-ids are no longer represented by IdentifierInfo's.
Extended Declarator to store overloaded operator names.
Sema::GetNameForDeclarator now knows how to turn the operator
name into a DeclarationName for the overloaded operator.
Except for (perhaps) consolidating the functionality of
ActOnIdentifier, ActOnOperatorFunctionIdExpr, and
ActOnConversionFunctionExpr into a common routine that builds an
appropriate DeclRefExpr by looking up a DeclarationName, all of the
work on normalizing declaration names should be complete with this
commit.
llvm-svn: 59526
destructors, and conversion functions. The placeholders were used to
work around the fact that the parser and some of Sema really wanted
declarators to have simple identifiers; now, the code that deals with
declarators will use DeclarationNames.
llvm-svn: 59469
C++ constructors, destructors, and conversion functions now have a
FETokenInfo field that IdentifierResolver can access, so that these
special names are handled just like ordinary identifiers. A few other
Sema routines now use DeclarationNames instead of IdentifierInfo*'s.
To validate this design, this code also implements parsing and
semantic analysis for id-expressions that name conversion functions,
e.g.,
return operator bool();
The new parser action ActOnConversionFunctionExpr takes the result of
parsing "operator type-id" and turning it into an expression, using
the IdentifierResolver with the DeclarationName of the conversion
function. ActOnDeclarator pushes those conversion function names into
scope so that the IdentifierResolver can find them, of course.
llvm-svn: 59462
functions for built-in operators, e.g., the builtin
bool operator==(int const*, int const*)
can be used for the expression "x1 == x2" given:
struct X {
operator int const*();
} x1, x2;
The scheme for handling these built-in operators is relatively simple:
for each candidate required by the standard, create a special kind of
candidate function for the built-in. If overload resolution picks the
built-in operator, we perform the appropriate conversions on the
arguments and then let the normal built-in operator take care of it.
There may be some optimization opportunity left: if we can reduce the
number of built-in operator overloads we generate, overload resolution
for these cases will go faster. However, one must be careful when
doing this: GCC generates too few operator overloads in our little
test program, and fails to compile it because none of the overloads it
generates match.
Note that we only support operator overload for non-member binary
operators at the moment. The other operators will follow.
As part of this change, ImplicitCastExpr can now be an lvalue.
llvm-svn: 59148
-When parsing declarators, don't depend on "CurScope->isCXXClassScope() == true" for constructors/destructors
-For C++ member declarations, don't depend on "Declarator.getContext() == Declarator::MemberContext"
llvm-svn: 58866
functions in C++, e.g.,
struct X {
operator bool() const;
};
Note that these conversions don't actually do anything, since we don't
yet have the ability to use them for implicit or explicit conversions.
llvm-svn: 58860
operators. For example, one can now write "x + y" where x or y is a
class or enumeration type, and Clang will perform overload resolution
for "+" based on the overloaded operators it finds.
The other kinds of overloadable operators in C++ will follow this same
approach.
Three major issues remain:
1) We don't find member operators
2) Since we don't have user-defined conversion operators, we can't
call any of the built-in overloaded operators in C++ [over.built].
3) Once we've done the semantic checks, we drop the overloaded
operator on the floor; it doesn't get into the AST at all.
llvm-svn: 58821
operators in C++. Overloaded operators can be called directly via
their operator-function-ids, e.g., "operator+(foo, bar)", but we don't
yet implement the semantics of operator overloading to handle, e.g.,
"foo + bar".
llvm-svn: 58817
Implicit declaration of destructors (when necessary).
Extended Declarator to store information about parsed constructors
and destructors; this will be extended to deal with declarators that
name overloaded operators (e.g., "operator +") and user-defined
conversion operators (e.g., "operator int").
llvm-svn: 58767
duplication in the handling of copy-initialization by constructor,
which occurs both for initialization of a declaration and for
overloading. The initialization code is due for some refactoring.
llvm-svn: 58756
cope with the case where a user-defined conversion is actually a copy
construction, and therefore can be compared against other standard
conversion sequences. While I called this a hack before, now I'm
convinced that it's the right way to go.
Compare overloads based on derived-to-base conversions that invoke
copy constructors.
Suppress user-defined conversions when attempting to call a
user-defined conversion.
llvm-svn: 58629
when appropriate.
Conversions for class types now make use of copy constructors. I've
replaced the egregious hack allowing class-to-class conversions with a
slightly less egregious hack calling these conversions standard
conversions (for overloading reasons).
llvm-svn: 58622
reference-collapsing.
Implement diagnostic for formation of a reference to cv void.
Drop cv-qualifiers added to a reference type when the reference type
comes from a typedef.
llvm-svn: 58612
conversions.
Notes:
- Overload resolution for converting constructors need to prohibit
user-defined conversions (hence, the test isn't -verify safe yet).
- We still use hacks for conversions from a class type to itself.
This will be the case until we start implicitly declaring the appropriate
special member functions. (That's next on my list)
llvm-svn: 58513
Notes:
- Constructors are never found by name lookup, so they'll never get
pushed into any scope. Instead, they are stored as an
OverloadedFunctionDecl in CXXRecordDecl for easy overloading.
- There's a new action isCurrentClassName that determines whether an
identifier is the name of the innermost class currently being defined;
we use this to identify the declarator-id grammar rule that refers to
a type-name.
- MinimalAction does *not* support parsing constructors.
- We now handle virtual and explicit function specifiers.
llvm-svn: 58499
- Allows definitions of overloaded functions :)
- Eliminates extraneous error messages when we have a definition of a
function that isn't an overload but doesn't have exactly the same type
as the original.
llvm-svn: 58382
ImplicitConversionSequence and, when doing so, following the specific
rules of [over.best.ics].
The computation of the implicit conversion sequences implements C++
[over.ics.ref], but we do not (yet) have ranking for implicit
conversion sequences that use reference binding.
llvm-svn: 58357
of copy initialization. Other pieces of the puzzle:
- Try/Perform-ImplicitConversion now handles implicit conversions
that don't involve references.
- Try/Perform-CopyInitialization uses
CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints for C. PerformCopyInitialization
is now used for all argument passing and returning values from a
function.
- Diagnose errors with declaring references and const values without
an initializer. (Uses a new Action callback, ActOnUninitializedDecl).
We do not yet have implicit conversion sequences for reference
binding, which means that we don't have any overloading support for
reference parameters yet.
llvm-svn: 58353
- CastExpr is the root of all casts
- ImplicitCastExpr is (still) used for all explicit casts
- ExplicitCastExpr is now the root of all *explicit* casts
- ExplicitCCastExpr (new name needed!?) is a C-style cast in C or C++
- CXXFunctionalCastExpr inherits from ExplicitCastExpr
- CXXNamedCastExpr inherits from ExplicitCastExpr and is the root of all
of the C++ named cast expression types (static_cast, dynamic_cast, etc.)
- Added classes CXXStaticCastExpr, CXXDynamicCastExpr,
CXXReinterpretCastExpr, and CXXConstCastExpr to
Also, fixed returned-stack-addr.cpp, which broke once when we fixed
reinterpret_cast to diagnose double->int* conversions and again when
we eliminated implicit conversions to reference types. The fix is in
both testcase and SemaChecking.cpp.
Most of this patch is simply support for the renaming. There's very
little actual change in semantics.
llvm-svn: 58264
conversions.
Added PerformImplicitConversion, which follows an implicit conversion sequence
computed by TryCopyInitialization and actually performs the implicit
conversions, including the extra check for ambiguity mentioned above.
llvm-svn: 58071
pointer-to-base. Also, add overload ranking for pointer conversions
(for both pointer-to-void and derived-to-base pointer conversions).
Note that we do not yet diagnose derived-to-base pointer conversion
errors that stem from ambiguous or inacessible base classes. These
aren't handled during overload resolution; rather, when the conversion
is actually used we go ahead and diagnose the error.
llvm-svn: 58017
conversions (e.g., comparing int* -> const int* against
int* -> const volatile int*); see C++ 13.3.3.2p3 bullet 3.
Add Sema::UnwrapSimilarPointerTypes to simplify the control flow of
IsQualificationConversion and CompareQualificationConversion (and fix
the handling of the int* -> volatile int* conversion in the former).
llvm-svn: 57978
Changes:
- Sema::IsQualificationConversion determines whether we have a qualification
conversion.
- Sema::CheckSingleAssignment constraints now follows the C++ rules in C++,
performing an implicit conversion from the right-hand side to the type of
the left-hand side rather than checking based on the C notion of
"compatibility". We now rely on the implicit-conversion code to
determine whether the conversion can happen or
not. Sema::TryCopyInitialization has an ugly reference-related
hack to cope with the initialization of references, for now.
- When building DeclRefExprs, strip away the reference type, since
there are no expressions whose type is a reference. We'll need to
do this throughout Sema.
- Expr::isLvalue now permits functions to be lvalues in C++ (but not
in C).
llvm-svn: 57935
class C {
static const int number = 50;
static int arr[number];
};
Here's how it worked:
-GetTypeForDeclarator was called from both Sema::ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator and Sema::ActOnDeclarator.
-VariableArrayTypes are not uniqued so two VariableArrayTypes were created with the same DeclRefExpr.
-On exit they both tried to destroy that one DeclRefExpr.
The fix is not to use GetTypeForDeclarator from the Sema::ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator.
llvm-svn: 57313
This is how this kind of initializers appear in the AST:
-The Init expression of the VarDecl is a functional type construction (of the VarDecl's type).
-The new VarDecl::hasCXXDirectInitializer() returns true.
e.g, for "int x(1);":
-VarDecl 'x' has Init with expression "int(1)" (CXXFunctionalCastExpr).
-hasCXXDirectInitializer() of VarDecl 'x' returns true.
A major benefit is that clients that don't particularly care about which exactly form was the initializer can handle both cases without special case code.
Note that codegening works now for "int x(1);" without any changes to CodeGen.
llvm-svn: 57178
This was the motivation of the following changes:
-'TentativeParsingResult' enum is replaced by a 'TPResult' class that basically encapsulates the enum.
-TPR_true, TPR_false, TPR_ambiguous, and TPR_error enum constants are replaced by TPResult::True(), TPResult::False(), etc. calls that return a TPResult object.
-Also fixed the subtle bug in Parser::isCXXFunctionDeclarator (caught by the above changes as a compilation error).
llvm-svn: 57125
'ParseTentative.cpp' implements the functionality needed to resolve ambiguous C++ statements, to either a declaration or an expression, by "tentatively parsing" them.
llvm-svn: 57084
-The Parser calls a new "ActOnCXXTypeConstructExpr" action.
-Sema, depending on the type and expressions number:
-If the type is a class, it will treat it as a class constructor. [TODO]
-If there's only one expression (i.e. "int(0.5)" ), creates a new "CXXFunctionalCastExpr" Expr node
-If there are no expressions (i.e "int()" ), creates a new "CXXZeroInitValueExpr" Expr node.
llvm-svn: 55177
Douglas Gregor