The CallAndMessageChecker has an existing check for when a function pointer
is called with too few arguments. Extend this logic to handle the block
case, as well. While we're at it, do a drive-by grammar correction
("less" --> "fewer") on the diagnostic text.
llvm-svn: 287001
When looking up the 'self' decl in block captures, make sure to find the actual
self declaration even when the block captures a local variable named 'self'.
rdar://problem/24751280
llvm-svn: 261703
BlockDecl has a poor AST representation because it doesn't carry its type
with it. Instead, the containing BlockExpr has the full type. This almost
never matters for the analyzer, but if the block decl contains static
local variables we need to synthesize a region to put them in, and this
region will necessarily not have the right type.
Even /that/ doesn't matter, unless
(1) the block calls the function or method containing the block, and
(2) the value of the block expr is used in some interesting way.
In this case, we actually end up needing the type of the block region,
and it will be set to our synthesized type. It turns out we've been doing
a terrible job faking that type -- it wasn't a block pointer type at all.
This commit fixes that to at least guarantee a block pointer type, using
the signature written by the user if there is one.
This is not really a correct answer because the block region's type will
/still/ be wrong, but further efforts to make this right in the analyzer
would probably be silly. We should just change the AST.
rdar://problem/21698099
llvm-svn: 241944
It is okay to declare a block without an argument list: ^ {} or ^void {}.
In these cases, the BlockDecl's signature-as-written will just contain
the return type, rather than the entire function type. It is unclear if
this is intentional, but the analyzer shouldn't crash because of it.
<rdar://problem/14018351>
llvm-svn: 182948
We still need to do a recursive walk to determine all static/global variables
referenced by a block, which is needed for region invalidation.
llvm-svn: 169481
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Dominic Chen