A fallible iterator is one whose increment or decrement operations may fail.
This would usually be supported by replacing the ++ and -- operators with
methods that return error:
class MyFallibleIterator {
public:
// ...
Error inc();
Errro dec();
// ...
};
The downside of this style is that it no longer conforms to the C++ iterator
concept, and can not make use of standard algorithms and features such as
range-based for loops.
The fallible_iterator wrapper takes an iterator written in the style above
and adapts it to (mostly) conform with the C++ iterator concept. It does this
by providing standard ++ and -- operator implementations, returning any errors
generated via a side channel (an Error reference passed into the wrapper at
construction time), and immediately jumping the iterator to a known 'end'
value upon error. It also marks the Error as checked any time an iterator is
compared with a known end value and found to be inequal, allowing early exit
from loops without redundant error checking*.
Usage looks like:
MyFallibleIterator I = ..., E = ...;
Error Err = Error::success();
for (auto &Elem : make_fallible_range(I, E, Err)) {
// Loop body is only entered when safe.
// Early exits from loop body permitted without checking Err.
if (SomeCondition)
return;
}
if (Err)
// Handle error.
* Since failure causes a fallible iterator to jump to end, testing that a
fallible iterator is not an end value implicitly verifies that the error is a
success value, and so is equivalent to an error check.
Reviewers: dblaikie, rupprecht
Subscribers: mgorny, dexonsmith, kristina, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57618
llvm-svn: 353237
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 unsigned integers with the scale of them
provided as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on
them.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55625
llvm-svn: 353059
Summary:
Up until the point i have looked in the source, i didn't even understood that
i can disable 'cluster' output. I have always silenced it via ` &> /dev/null`.
(And hoped it wasn't contributing much of the run time.)
While i expect that it has it's use-cases i never once needed it so far.
If i forget to silence it, console is completely flooded with that output.
How about not expecting users to opt-out of analyses,
but to explicitly specify the analyses that should be performed?
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57648
llvm-svn: 353021
Reverting D57264 again, it looks like we're down to two bots that need fixing:
polly-amd64-linux
polly-arm-linux
They both have old versions of libstdc++ and recent clang.
llvm-svn: 352954
Summary:
The RFC on moving past C++11 got good traction:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129452.html
This patch therefore bumps the toolchain versions according to our policy:
llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#toolchain
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, jyknight, rsmith, chandlerc, smeenai, hans, reames, lattner, lhames, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264
llvm-svn: 352951
A while back, createStringError was added to provide easier construction
of StringError instances, especially with formatting options. Prior to
this patch, that the documentation only mentions the standard method of
using it. Since createStringError is slightly shorter to type, and also
provides the formatting options, this patch updates the Programmer's
Manual to use the new function in its examples, and to mention the
printf formatting options. It also fixes a small typo in one of the
examples and removes the unnecessary make_error_code call.
llvm-svn: 352846
Summary:
The RFC on moving past C++11 got good traction:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129452.html
This patch therefore bumps the toolchain versions according to our policy:
llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#toolchain
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, jyknight, rsmith, chandlerc, smeenai, hans, reames, lattner, lhames, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264
llvm-svn: 352834
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
A handful of bots are still breaking, either because I missed them in my audit,
they were offline, or something else. I'm contacting their authors, but I'll
revert for now and re-commit later.
llvm-svn: 352814
Summary:
The RFC on moving past C++11 got good traction:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129452.html
This patch therefore bumps the toolchain versions according to our policy:
llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#toolchain
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, jyknight, rsmith, chandlerc, smeenai, hans, reames, lattner, lhames, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57264
llvm-svn: 352811
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
This is meant to be used with clang's __builtin_dynamic_object_size.
When 'true' is passed to this parameter, the intrinsic has the
potential to be folded into instructions that will be evaluated
at run time. When 'false', the objectsize intrinsic behaviour is
unchanged.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56761
llvm-svn: 352664
If we just compile with -O0, clang will add optnone attributes
everywhere, so opt won't actually be able to perform any passes.
Instruct clang to not emit the optnone so opt can do its thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56950
llvm-svn: 352550
This fixes most references to the paths:
llvm.org/svn/
llvm.org/git/
llvm.org/viewvc/
github.com/llvm-mirror/
github.com/llvm-project/
reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/
to instead point to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.
This is *not* a trivial substitution, because additionally, all the
checkout instructions had to be migrated to instruct users on how to
use the monorepo layout, setting LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS instead of
checking out various projects into various subdirectories.
I've attempted to not change any scripts here, only documentation. The
scripts will have to be addressed separately.
Additionally, I've deleted one document which appeared to be outdated
and unneeded:
lldb/docs/building-with-debug-llvm.txt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57330
llvm-svn: 352514
If a stack trace or similar has a list of addresses from an executable
or DSO loaded at a variable address (e.g. due to ASLR), the addresses
will not directly correspond to the addresses stored in the object file.
If a user wishes to use llvm-symbolizer, they have to subtract the load
address from every address. This is somewhat inconvenient, especially as
the output of --print-address will result in the adjusted address being
listed, rather than the address coming from the stack trace, making it
harder to map results between the two.
This change adds a new switch to llvm-symbolizer --adjust-vma which
takes an offset, which is then used to automatically do this
calculation. The printed address remains the input address (allowing for
easy mapping), whilst the specified offset is applied to the addresses
when performing the lookup.
The switch is conceptually similar to llvm-objdump's new switch of the
same name (see D57051), which in turn mirrors a GNU switch. There is no
equivalent switch in addr2line.
Reviewed by: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57151
llvm-svn: 352195
This patch extends TableGen language with !cond operator.
Instead of embedding !if inside !if which can get cumbersome,
one can now use !cond.
Below is an example to convert an integer 'x' into a string:
!cond(!lt(x,0) : "Negative",
!eq(x,0) : "Zero",
!eq(x,1) : "One,
1 : "MoreThanOne")
Reviewed By: hfinkel, simon_tatham, greened
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55758
llvm-svn: 352185
Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However,
the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
`noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
`_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important
for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan
cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack
unwinding is used.
Changes:
# UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes
the `noreturn` attribute from a function
# ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute
Generated code:
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
unreachable
```
The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be
cleaned up in a follow-up patch.
rdar://problem/40723397
Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624
llvm-svn: 352003
This change adds two options, -i and -inlines as aliases for the -inlining option to llvm-symbolizer to improve compatibility with the GNU addr2line utility which accepts these options.
It also modifies existing tests that use -inlining to exercise these new aliases as well.
This fixes PR40073.
Reviewed by: jhenderson, Quolyk, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57083
llvm-svn: 351999
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072.
GNU addr2line's --functions switch is off by default, has a short alias
of -f, and does not take an argument. This patch changes llvm-symbolizer
to allow the second and third point (changing the default behaviour may
have negative impacts on users). If the option is missing a value, it
now treats it as "linkage".
This change does cause one previously valid command-line to behave
differently. Before --functions <value> was accepted, but now only
--functions=<value> is allowed (as well as --functions). The old
behaviour will result in the value being treated as a positional
argument.
The previous testing for --functions=short has been pulled out into a
new test that also tests the other accepted values and option formats.
Reviewed by: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57049
llvm-svn: 351968
The old diagnostic form of the trace produced by -v and -vv looks
like:
```
check1:1:8: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
CHECK: abc
^
<stdin>:1:3: note: found here
; abc def
^~~
```
When dumping annotated input is requested (via -dump-input), I find
that this old trace is not useful and is sometimes harmful:
1. The old trace is mostly redundant because the same basic
information also appears in the input dump's annotations.
2. The old trace buries any error diagnostic between it and the input
dump, but I find it useful to see any error diagnostic up front.
3. FILECHECK_OPTS=-dump-input=fail requests annotated input dumps only
for failed FileCheck calls. However, I have to also add -v or -vv
to get a full set of annotations, and that can produce massive
output from all FileCheck calls in all tests. That's a real
problem when I run this in the IDE I use, which grinds to a halt as
it tries to capture all that output.
When -dump-input=fail|always, this patch suppresses the old trace from
-v or -vv. Error diagnostics still print as usual. If you want the
old trace, perhaps to see variable expansions, you can set
-dump-input=none (the default).
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55825
llvm-svn: 351881
Summary:
A couple of changes in the Scudo documentation:
- tag the shell code blocks as `console`;
- document error messages that are displayed in some termination conditions,
the reason they triggered, and potential causes.
Reviewers: eugenis, enh
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56857
llvm-svn: 351838
This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.
This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.
llvm-svn: 351796
Specifically, clarify the following:
1. Volatile load and store may access addresses that are not memory.
2. Volatile load and store do not modify arbitrary memory.
3. Volatile load and store do not trap.
Prompted by recent volatile discussion on llvmdev.
Currently, there's sort of a split in the source code about whether
volatile operations are allowed to trap; this resolves that dispute in
favor of not allowing them to trap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53184
llvm-svn: 351772
Summary:
Capture the current agreed-upon toolchain update policy based on the following
discussions:
- LLVM dev meeting 2018 BoF "Migrating to C++14, and beyond!"
llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#bof3
- A Short Policy Proposal Regarding Host Compilers
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123238.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2018)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123182.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2017)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118673.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2016)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/105483.html
- Document and Enforce new Host Compiler Policy
llvm.org/D47073
- Require GCC 5.1 and LLVM 3.5 at a minimum
llvm.org/D46723
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56819
llvm-svn: 351765
all missed!
Thanks to Alex Bradbury for pointing this out, and the fact that I never
added the intended `legacy` anchor to the developer policy. Add that
anchor too. With hope, this will cause the links to all resolve
successfully.
llvm-svn: 351731
As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36651, the specialization for
isPodLike<std::pair<...>> did not match the expectation of
std::is_trivially_copyable which makes the memcpy optimization invalid.
This patch renames the llvm::isPodLike trait into llvm::is_trivially_copyable.
Unfortunately std::is_trivially_copyable is not portable across compiler / STL
versions. So a portable version is provided too.
Note that the following specialization were invalid:
std::pair<T0, T1>
llvm::Optional<T>
Tests have been added to assert that former specialization are respected by the
standard usage of llvm::is_trivially_copyable, and that when a decent version
of std::is_trivially_copyable is available, llvm::is_trivially_copyable is
compared to std::is_trivially_copyable.
As of this patch, llvm::Optional is no longer considered trivially copyable,
even if T is. This is to be fixed in a later patch, as it has impact on a
long-running bug (see r347004)
Note that GCC warns about this UB, but this got silented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D50296.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54472
llvm-svn: 351701
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Lang Hames