This required a couple of yaks to be shaved:
1. MatchingOpeningBlockLineIndex was misused to also store the
closing index; instead, use a second variable, as this doesn't
work correctly for "} else {".
2. We needed to change the API of AffectedRangeManager to not
use iterators; we always passed in begin / end for the whole
container before, so there was no mismatch in generality.
3. We need an extra check to discontinue formatting at the top
level, as we now sometimes change the indent of the closing
brace, but want to bail out immediately afterwards, for
example:
void f() {
if (a) {
}
void g();
Previously:
void f() {
if (a) {
}
void g();
Now:
void f() {
if (a) {
}
void g();
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45726
llvm-svn: 330573
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
Summary:
When a preprocessor indent closes after the last line of normal code we do not
correctly fixup include guard indents. For example:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
int i;
# define A 0
#endif
#endif
incorrectly reformats to:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
int i;
# define A 0
# endif
#endif
To resolve this issue we must fixup levels after parseFile(). Delaying
the fixup introduces a new state, so consolidate include guard search
state into an enum.
Reviewers: krasimir, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42035
llvm-svn: 324246
Summary:
When a preprocessor indent closes after the last line of normal code we do not
correctly fixup include guard indents. For example:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
int i;
# define A 0
#endif
#endif
incorrectly reformats to:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
int i;
# define A 0
# endif
#endif
To resolve this issue we must fixup levels after parseFile(). Delaying
the fixup introduces a new state, so consolidate include guard search
state into an enum.
Reviewers: krasimir, klimek
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42035
llvm-svn: 324238
Correctly determine when [ is part of a structured binding instead of a
lambda.
To be able to reuse the implementation already available, this patch also:
- sets the Previous link of FormatTokens in the UnwrappedLineParser
- moves the isCppStructuredBinding function into FormatToken
Before:
auto const const &&[x, y] { A *i };
After:
auto const const && [x, y]{A * i};
Fixing formatting of the type of the structured binding is still missing.
llvm-svn: 313742
Most of the work was already done when we introduced a look-behind based
lambda introducer detection.
This patch finishes the transition by completely relying on the simple
lambda introducer detection and simply recursing into normal
brace-parsing code to parse until the end of the introducer.
This fixes initializers in lambdas, including nested lambdas.
Before:
auto a = [b = [c = 42]{}]{};
auto b = [c = &i + 23]{};
After:
auto a = [b = [c = 42] {}] {};
auto b = [c = &i + 23] {};
llvm-svn: 313622
Summary:
This is an implementation for [bug 17362](https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?bugid=17362) which adds support for indenting preprocessor statements inside if/ifdef/endif. This takes previous work from fmauch (https://github.com/fmauch/clang/tree/preprocessor_indent) and makes it into a full feature.
The context of this patch is that I'm a VMware intern, and I implemented this because VMware needs the feature. As such, some decisions were made based on what VMware wants, and I would appreciate suggestions on expanding this if necessary to use-cases other people may want.
This adds a new enum config option, `IndentPPDirectives`. Values are:
* `PPDIS_None` (in config: `None`):
```
#if FOO
#if BAR
#include <foo>
#endif
#endif
```
* `PPDIS_AfterHash` (in config: `AfterHash`):
```
#if FOO
# if BAR
# include <foo>
# endif
#endif
```
This is meant to work whether spaces or tabs are used for indentation. Preprocessor indentation is independent of indentation for non-preprocessor lines.
Preprocessor indentation also attempts to ignore include guards with the checks:
1. Include guards cover the entire file
2. Include guards don't have `#else`
3. Include guards begin with
```
#ifndef <var>
#define <var>
```
This patch allows `UnwrappedLineParser::PPBranchLevel` to be decremented to -1 (the initial value is -1) so the variable can be used for indent tracking.
Defects:
* This patch does not handle the case where there's code between the `#ifndef` and `#define` but all other conditions hold. This is because when the #define line is parsed, `UnwrappedLineParser::Lines` doesn't hold the previous code line yet, so we can't detect it. This is out of the scope of this patch.
* This patch does not handle cases where legitimate lines may be outside an include guard. Examples are `#pragma once` and `#pragma GCC diagnostic`, or anything else that does not change the meaning of the file if it's included multiple times.
* This does not detect when there is a single non-preprocessor line in front of an include-guard-like structure where other conditions hold because `ScopedLineState` hides the line.
* Preprocessor indentation throws off `TokenAnnotator::setCommentLineLevels` so the indentation of comments immediately before indented preprocessor lines is toggled on each run. Fixing this issue appears to be a major change and too much complexity for this patch.
Contributed by @euhlmann!
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir
Reviewed By: djasper, krasimir
Subscribers: krasimir, mzeren-vmw, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35955
llvm-svn: 312125
Summary:
The current code would return an incorrect value when a preprocessor
directive is present immediately after the opening brace: this causes
the nanespace end comment fixer to break in some places, for exemple it
would not add the comment in this case:
namespace a {
#define FOO
}
Fixing the computation is simple enough, but it was breaking a feature,
as it would cause comments to be added also when the namespace
declaration was dependant on conditional compilation.
To fix this, a hash of the current preprocessor stack/branches is
computed at the beginning of parseBlock(), so that we explicitely do not
store the OpeningLineIndex when the beginning and end of the block are
not in the same preprocessor conditions.
Tthe hash is computed based on the line, but this could propbably be
improved by using the actual condition, so that clang-format would be
able to match multiple identical #ifdef blocks.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35483
llvm-svn: 309369
Summary:
This fixes a regression exposed by r307795 and rL308725 in which the level of a
comment line between '} else {' and a preprocessor directive is incorrectly set
as the level of the '} else {' line. For example, this :
```
int f(int i) {
if (i) {
++i;
} else {
// comment
#ifdef A
--i;
#endif
}
}
```
was formatted as:
```
int f(int i) {
if (i) {
++i;
} else {
// comment
#ifdef A
--i;
#endif
}
}
```
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35794
llvm-svn: 308882
Summary:
This patch adds support for <>-style proto message fields inside proto options.
Previously these were wrongly treated as binary operators and as such were
working only by chance for a limited number of cases.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34621
llvm-svn: 306406
Summary:
This patch adds a NamespaceEndCommentsFixer TokenAnalyzer for clang-format,
which fixes end namespace comments.
It currently supports inserting and updating existing wrong comments.
Example source:
```
namespace A {
int i;
}
namespace B {
int j;
} // namespace A
```
after formatting:
```
namespace A {
int i;
} // namespace A
namespace B {
int j;
} // namespace B
```
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30269
llvm-svn: 296341
Summary:
Make the comment alignment respect sections of line comments originally alinged
with the next token. Until now the decision how to break a continuous sequence
of line comments into sections was taken without reference to the next token.
source:
```
class A {
public: // comment about public
// comment about a
int a;
}
```
format before:
```
class A {
public: // comment about public
// comment about a
int a;
}
```
format after:
```
class A {
public: // comment about public
// comment about a
int a;
}
```
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29626
llvm-svn: 294435
Summary:
In JavaScript, classes are expressions, so they can appear e.g. in
argument lists.
var C = foo(class {
bar() {
return 1;
}
};
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29635
llvm-svn: 294302
Summary:
The comment reflower wasn't taking comment pragmas as reflow stoppers. This patch fixes that.
source:
```
// long long long long
// IWYU pragma:
```
format with column limit = 20 before:
```
// long long long
// long IWYU pragma:
```
format with column limit = 20 after:
```
// long long long
// long
// IWYU pragma:
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29450
llvm-svn: 293898
Automatic Semicolon Insertion can only be properly handled by parsing
source code. However conservatively catching just a few, common
situations prevents breaking code during development, which greatly
improves usability.
JS code should still use semicolons, and ASI code should be flagged by
a compiler or linter.
Patch by Martin Probst. Thank you.
llvm-svn: 263470
Summary: It breaks the build for the ASTMatchers
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13893
llvm-svn: 250827
Specifically adhere to LLVM Coding Standards (no 'else' after
return/break/continue) and remove yet another implementation of
paren counting. We already have enough of those in the
UnwrappedLineParser.
No functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 238672
Assigns a token type (TT_JsFatArrow) to => tokens, and uses that to
more easily recognize and format fat arrow functions.
Improves function parsing to better recognize formal parameter
lists and return type declarations.
Recognizes arrow functions and parse function bodies as child blocks.
Patch by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 237895
Before:
class C : test {
class D : test{void f(){int i{2};
}
}
;
}
;
After:
class C : test {
class D : test {
void f() { int i{2}; }
};
};
llvm-svn: 237569
Before:
A a = new A(){public String toString(){return "NotReallyA";
}
}
;
After:
A a = return new A() {
public String toString() {
return "NotReallyA";
}
};
This fixes llvm.org/PR22878.
llvm-svn: 232042
Now correctly formats:
{
int a;
void f() {
callme(some(parameter1,
<<<<<<< text by the vcs
parameter2),
||||||| text by the vcs
parameter2),
parameter3,
======= text by the vcs
parameter2, parameter3),
>>>>>>> text by the vcs
otherparameter);
}
}
llvm-svn: 206157
This was done when we were not able to parse lambdas to handle some
edge cases for block formatting different in return statements, but is
not necessary any more.
llvm-svn: 199982
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
Summary:
Added BraceBreakingStyle::BS_GNU. I'm not sure about the correctness of
static initializer formatting, but compound statements should be fine.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2372
llvm-svn: 197138
While it is mostly a user error to have the extra semicolon,
formatting it graciously will correctly format in the cases
where we do not fully understand the code (macros).
llvm-svn: 192543
Manuel Klimek