Summary:
This is an alternative to JSONCompilationDatabase for simple projects that
don't use a build system such as CMake.
(You can also drop one in ~, to make your tools use e.g. C++11 by default)
There's no facility for varying flags per-source-file or per-machine.
Possibly this could be accommodated backwards-compatibly using cpp, but even if
not the simplicity seems worthwhile for the cases that are addressed.
Tested with clangd, works great! (requires clangd restart)
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39799
llvm-svn: 317777
Summary:
The OccurrencesFinder is only used in RenameOccurrences to find symbol
occurrences, there is no need to inherit RefactoringRule.
Replace it with a single utility function to avoid code misleading.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39796
llvm-svn: 317696
Summary:
For code reuse in SemaCodeComplete.
Note that the tests for QualTypeNames are still in Tooling as they use
Tooling's common testing code.
Reviewers: rsmith, saugustine, rnk, klimek, bkramer
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39224
llvm-svn: 317676
when needed
This commit implements the semicolon insertion logic into the extract
refactoring. The following rules are used:
- extracting expression: add terminating ';' to the extracted function.
- extracting statements that don't require terminating ';' (e.g. switch): add
terminating ';' to the callee.
- extracting statements with ';': move (if possible) the original ';' from the
callee and add terminating ';'.
- otherwise, add ';' to both places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39441
llvm-svn: 317343
This commit changes the way that the refactoring operation classes are
structured:
- Users have to call `initiate` instead of constructing an instance of the
class. The `initiate` is now supposed to have custom initiation logic, and
you don't need to subclass the builtin requirements.
- A new `describe` function returns a structure with the id, title and the
description of the refactoring operation.
The refactoring action classes are now placed into one common place in
RefactoringActions.cpp instead of being separate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38985
llvm-svn: 316780
Summary:
This defines a `clang::tooling::ToolExecutor` interface that can be extended to support different execution plans including standalone execution on a given set of TUs or parallel execution on all TUs in a codebase.
In order to enable multiprocessing execution, tool actions are expected to output result into a `ToolResults` interface provided by executors. The `ToolResults` interface abstracts how results are stored e.g. in-memory for standalone executions or on-disk for large-scale execution.
New executors can be registered as `ToolExecutorPlugin`s via the `ToolExecutorPluginRegistry`. CLI tools can use `createExecutorFromCommandLineArgs` to create a specific registered executor according to the command-line arguments.
This patch also implements `StandaloneToolExecutor` which has the same behavior as the current `ClangTool` interface, i.e. execute frontend actions on a given set of TUs. At this point, it's simply a wrapper around `ClangTool` at this point.
This is still experimental but expected to replace the existing `ClangTool` interface so that specific tools would not need to worry about execution.
Reviewers: klimek, arphaman, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, djasper, mgorny, omtcyfz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34272
llvm-svn: 316653
This commit adds an initial, skeleton outline of the "extract function"
refactoring. The extracted function doesn't capture variables / rewrite code
yet, it just basically does a simple copy-paste.
The following initiation rules are specified:
- extraction can only be done for executable code in a function/method/block.
This means that you can't extract a global variable initialize into a function
right now.
- simple literals and references are not extractable.
This commit also adds support for full source ranges to clang-refactor's test
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38982
llvm-svn: 316465
Summary: This returns error instead of exiting the program in case of error.
Reviewers: klimek, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39042
llvm-svn: 316433
GCC tries to shorten system headers in depfiles using its real path
(resolving components like ".." and following symlinks). Mimic this
feature to ensure that the Ninja build tool detects the correct
dependencies when a symlink changes directory levels, see
https://github.com/ninja-build/ninja/issues/1330
An option to disable this feature is added in case "these changed header
paths may conflict with some compilation environments", see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00287.html
Note that the original feature request for GCC
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974) also included paths
preprocessed output (-E) and diagnostics. That is not implemented now
since I am not sure if it breaks something else.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37954
llvm-svn: 316193
consecutive statements
This commit adds a CodeRangeASTSelection value to the refactoring library. This
value represents a set of selected statements in one body of code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38835
llvm-svn: 316104
Summary:
* Support rename alias.
* Add unittests for renaming alias.
* Don't generate fixes for the SourceLocations that are invalid or in temporary
buffer, otherwise crash would be happened when generating AtomicChanges.
Reviewers: ioeric
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39043
llvm-svn: 316074
This commit allows the refactoring library to use its own set of
refactoring-specific diagnostics to reports things like initiation errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38772
llvm-svn: 315924
Summary:
Also contain a fix:
* Fix a false positive of renaming a using shadow function declaration.
Reviewers: ioeric
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38882
llvm-svn: 315898
The recommit fixes a UB bug that occurred only on a small number of bots.
Original message:
This commit adds initial support for refactoring options. One can now use
optional and required std::string options.
This commit also adds a NewNameOption for the local-rename refactoring action to
allow rename to work with custom names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37856
llvm-svn: 315661
This reverts commit 4e4ee1c507e2707bb3c208e1e1b6551c3015cbf5.
This is failing due to some code that isn't built on MSVC
so I didn't catch. Not immediately obvious how to fix this
at first glance, so I'm reverting for now.
llvm-svn: 315536
There's a lot of misuse of Twine scattered around LLVM. This
ranges in severity from benign (returning a Twine from a function
by value that is just a string literal) to pretty sketchy (storing
a Twine by value in a class). While there are some uses for
copying Twines, most of the very compelling ones are confined
to the Twine class implementation itself, and other uses are
either dubious or easily worked around.
This patch makes Twine's copy constructor private, and fixes up
all callsites.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38767
llvm-svn: 315530
This commit adds initial support for refactoring options. One can now use
optional and required std::string options.
This commit also adds a NewNameOption for the local-rename refactoring action to
allow rename to work with custom names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37856
llvm-svn: 315087
This commit simplifies the interface for the refactoring action rules and the
refactoring requirements. It merges the selection constraints and the selection
requirements into one class. The refactoring actions rules must now be
implemented using subclassing instead of raw function / lambda pointers. This
change also removes a bunch of template-based traits and other
template definitions that are now redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37681
llvm-svn: 314704
This commit ensures that CommonOptionsParser works with subcommands. This allows
clang-refactor to use the CommonOptionsParser.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37618
llvm-svn: 313260
local-rename action
This commit introduces the clang-refactor tool alongside the local-rename action
which uses the existing renaming engine used by clang-rename. The tool
doesn't actually perform the source transformations yet, it just provides
testing support. This commit also moves only one test from clang-rename over to
test/Refactor. I will continue to move the other tests throughout
development of clang-refactor.
The following options are supported by clang-refactor:
-v: use verbose output
-selection: The source range that corresponds to the portion of the source
that's selected (currently only special command test:<file> is supported).
Please note that a follow-up commit will migrate clang-refactor to
libTooling's common option parser, so clang-refactor will be able to use
the common interface with compilation database and options like -p, -extra-arg,
etc.
The testing support provided by clang-refactor is described below:
When -selection=test:<file> is given, clang-refactor will parse the selection
commands from that file. The selection commands are grouped and the specified
refactoring action invoked by the tool. Each command in a group is expected to
produce an identical result. The precise syntax for the selection commands is
described in a comment in TestSupport.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574
llvm-svn: 313244
Summary:
The use case is that renaming multiple symbols in a large enough codebase is
much faster if all of these can be done with a single invocation, but
there will be multiple translation units where one or more symbols are
not found.
Old behavior was to exit with an error (default) or exit without
reporting an error (-force). New behavior is that -force results in a
best-effort rename: rename symbols which are found and just ignore the
rest.
The existing help for -force sort of already implies this behavior.
Reviewers: cfe-commits, klimek, arphaman
Reviewed By: klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37634
llvm-svn: 312942
form of PseudoObjectExpr
The new commit adjusts unittest test code compilation options so that the
Objective-C code in the unittest can be parsed on non-macOS platforms.
Original message:
The AST selection finder now constructs a selection tree that contains only the
syntactic form of PseudoObjectExpr. This form of selection tree is more
meaningful when doing downstream analysis as we're interested in the syntactic
features of the AST and the correct lexical parent relation.
llvm-svn: 312132
of PseudoObjectExpr
The AST selection finder now constructs a selection tree that contains only the
syntactic form of PseudoObjectExpr. This form of selection tree is more
meaningful when doing downstream analysis as we're interested in the syntactic
features of the AST and the correct lexical parent relation.
llvm-svn: 312127
Information about clang executable name components, such as target and
driver mode, was passes in std::pair. With this change it is passed in
a special structure. It improves readability and makes access to this
information more convenient.
NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36057
llvm-svn: 311981
This patch implements the initial support for refactoring action rules. The
first rule that's supported is a "source change" rule that returns a set of
atomic changes. This patch is based on the ideas presented in my RFC:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-July/054831.html
The following pieces from the RFC are added by this patch:
- `createRefactoringRule` (known as `apply` in the RFC)
- `requiredSelection` refactoring action rule requirement.
- `selection::SourceSelectionRange` selection constraint.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36075
llvm-svn: 311884
Sam McCall