// C - zext(bool) -> bool ? C - 1 : C
if (ZExtInst *ZI = dyn_cast<ZExtInst>(Op1))
if (ZI->getSrcTy()->isIntegerTy(1))
return SelectInst::Create(ZI->getOperand(0), SubOne(C), C);
This ends up forming sext i1 instructions that codegen to terrible code. e.g.
int blah(_Bool x, _Bool y) {
return (x - y) + 1;
}
=>
movzbl %dil, %eax
movzbl %sil, %ecx
shll $31, %ecx
sarl $31, %ecx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx), %eax
ret
Without the rule, llvm now generates:
movzbl %sil, %ecx
movzbl %dil, %eax
incl %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
ret
It also helps with ARM (and pretty much any target that doesn't have a sext i1 :-).
The transformation was done as part of Eli's r75531. He has given the ok to
remove it.
rdar://11748024
llvm-svn: 159230
-%a + 42
into
42 - %a
previously we were emitting:
-(%a + 42)
This fixes the infinite loop in PR12338. The generated code is still not perfect, though.
Will work on that next
llvm-svn: 158237
This allows us to keep passing reduced masks to SimplifyDemandedBits, but
know about all the bits if SimplifyDemandedBits fails. This allows instcombine
to simplify cases like the one in the included testcase.
llvm-svn: 154011
- Ignore pointer casts.
- Also expand GEPs that aren't constantexprs when they have one use or only constant indices.
- We now compile "&foo[i] - &foo[j]" into "i - j".
llvm-svn: 150961
This has the obvious advantage of being commutable and is always a win on x86 because
const - x wastes a register there. On less weird architectures this may lead to
a regression because other arithmetic doesn't fuse with it anymore. I'll address that
problem in a followup.
llvm-svn: 147254
gep to explicit addressing, we know that none of the intermediate
computation overflows.
This could use review: it seems that the shifts certainly wouldn't
overflow, but could the intermediate adds overflow if there is a
negative index?
Previously the testcase would instcombine to:
define i1 @test(i64 %i) {
%p1.idx.mask = and i64 %i, 4611686018427387903
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %p1.idx.mask, 1000
ret i1 %cmp
}
now we get:
define i1 @test(i64 %i) {
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %i, 1000
ret i1 %cmp
}
llvm-svn: 125271
and generally tidying things up. Only very trivial functionality changes
like now doing (-1 - A) -> (~A) for vectors too.
InstCombineAddSub.cpp | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
llvm-svn: 125264
if both A op B and A op C simplify. This fires fairly often but doesn't
make that much difference. On gcc-as-one-file it removes two "and"s and
turns one branch into a select.
llvm-svn: 122399
fairly systematic way in instcombine. Some of these cases were already dealt
with, in which case I removed the existing code. The case of Add has a bunch of
funky logic which covers some of this plus a few variants (considers shifts to be
a form of multiplication), which I didn't touch. The simplification performed is:
A*B+A*C -> A*(B+C). The improvement is to do this in cases that were not already
handled [such as A*B-A*C -> A*(B-C), which was reported on the mailing list], and
also to do it more often by not checking for "only one use" if "B+C" simplifies.
llvm-svn: 120024
SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative) "(A op C1) op C2" -> "A op (C1 op C2)",
which previously was only done if C1 and C2 were constants, to occur whenever
"C1 op C2" simplifies (a la InstructionSimplify). Since the simplifying operand
combination can no longer be assumed to be the right-hand terms, consider all of
the possible permutations. When compiling "gcc as one big file", transform 2
(i.e. using right-hand operands) fires about 4000 times but it has to be said
that most of the time the simplifying operands are both constants. Transforms
3, 4 and 5 each fired once. Transform 6, which is an existing transform that
I didn't change, never fired. With this change, the testcase is now optimized
perfectly with one run of instcombine (previously it required instcombine +
reassociate + instcombine, and it may just have been luck that this worked).
llvm-svn: 119002
added to the FSub version. However, the original version of this xform guarded
against doing this for floating point (!Op0->getType()->isFPOrFPVector()).
This is causing LLVM to perform incorrect xforms for code like:
void func(double *rhi, double *rlo, double xh, double xl, double yh, double yl){
double mh, ml;
double c = 134217729.0;
double up, u1, u2, vp, v1, v2;
up = xh*c;
u1 = (xh - up) + up;
u2 = xh - u1;
vp = yh*c;
v1 = (yh - vp) + vp;
v2 = yh - v1;
mh = xh*yh;
ml = (((u1*v1 - mh) + (u1*v2)) + (u2*v1)) + (u2*v2);
ml += xh*yl + xl*yh;
*rhi = mh + ml;
*rlo = (mh - (*rhi)) + ml;
}
The last line was optimized away, but rl is intended to be the difference
between the infinitely precise result of mh + ml and after it has been rounded
to double precision.
llvm-svn: 93369
Michael Ilseman