Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Unify default construction of error_code uses on this idiom so that users don't
feel compelled to make static globals for naming convenience. (unfortunately I
couldn't make the original ctor private as some APIs don't return their result,
instead using an out parameter (that makes sense to default construct) - which
is a bit of a pity. I did, however, find/fix some cases of unnecessary default
construction of error_code before I hit the unfixable cases)
llvm-svn: 150197
If someone would prefer a clear name for the 'success' error_value we could
come up with one - potentially just a 'named constructor' style
'error_value::success()' to make this expression more self-documenting. If
I see this come up in other cases I'll certainly consider it.
One step along the way to resolving PR11944.
llvm-svn: 150120
This CL delays reading of function bodies from initial parse until
materialization, allowing overlap of compilation with bitcode download.
llvm-svn: 149918
Chandler Carruth