When enable_if disables a particular overload resolution candidate,
rummage through the enable_if condition to find the specific condition
that caused the failure. For example, if we have something like:
template<
typename Iter,
typename = std::enable_if_t<Random_access_iterator<Iter> &&
Comparable<Iterator_value_type<Iter>>>>
void mysort(Iter first, Iter last) {}
and we call "mysort" with "std::list<int>" iterators, we'll get a
diagnostic saying that the "Random_access_iterator<Iter>" requirement
failed. If we call "mysort" with
"std::vector<something_not_comparable>", we'll get a diagnostic saying
that the "Comparable<...>" requirement failed.
llvm-svn: 307196
This moves determination of the ISA revision from the CPU name to
one single place, removing a bunch of duplicated code. It also
makes the supported ISA revisions available as feature strings.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 307156
These cases occur frequently for declarations in the global module (above the
module-declaration) in a Modules TS module interface. When we merge a
definition from another module into such a module-private definition, ensure
that we transitively make everything lexically within that definition visible
to that translation unit.
llvm-svn: 307129
Currently AMDGPUTargetInfo does not initialize AddrSpaceMap in constructor, which causes regressions in mesa/clover with libclc.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34987
llvm-svn: 307105
Summary:
Enable LLVM asan sanitizer for NetBSD/amd64.
Don't generate -ldl for dlopen(3)-like functions on NetBSD.
These features are available in libc on NetBSD.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, eugenis, kcc, dim
Reviewed By: dim
Subscribers: #clang, #sanitizers
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34960
llvm-svn: 307104
Summary:
This way, the behavior of that warning flag
more closely resembles that of GCC.
Do note that there is at least one false-negative (see FIXME in tests).
Fixes PR4802.
Testing:
```
ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, alexfh, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33102
llvm-svn: 307045
-fslp-vectorize-aggressive and -fno-slp-vectorize-aggressive flags back
under this group and test for the warning. Document the future removal
in the ReleaseNotes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34926
llvm-svn: 306965
In C mode clang fails to merge the textually included definition with the one imported from a module. The C lookup rules fail to find the imported definition because its linkage is internal in non C++ mode.
This patch reinstates some of the ODR merging rules for typedefs of anonymous tags for languages other than C++.
Patch by Raphael Isemann and me (D34510).
llvm-svn: 306964
Combined directives like 'target parallel' have two captured statements.
Sema has to check the right one from the right direction.
Previously, Sema::IsOpenMPCapturedByRef would return false for mapped
scalars on combined directives. This results in a wrong signature of
the outlined function which triggers an assertion:
void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::FunctionType *, llvm::Value *, ArrayRef<llvm::Value *>, ArrayRef<OperandBundleDef>, const llvm::Twine &): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"' failed.
Fixes PR30975 (and PR31985). New function was taken from clang-ykt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34888
llvm-svn: 306956
Summary:
Changed EABIVersion type from string to llvm::EABI.
It seems it was just a typo and this is intended implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34595
llvm-svn: 306953
Summary:
Un-revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868, but with a slight tweak to the
documentation to fix an error -- I had used the wrong syntax for a link.
llvm-svn: 306948
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
Add a Clang frontend option to enable optimization remark hotness
thresholds, which were added to LLVM in https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
This prevents diagnostics that do not meet a minimum hotness
threshold from being output. When generating optimization remarks for large
codebases with a ton of cold code paths, this option can be used
to limit the optimization remark output at a reasonable size.
Discussion of this change can be read here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114377.html
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868
llvm-svn: 306945
the target is 32-bit.
The following changes are made to the driver since 32-bit apps do not
run on iOS 11 or later:
- If the deployment target is set explicitly, either with a command-line
option or an environment variable, the driver should report an error
if the version is greater than iOS 10.
- In the case where the deployment target is not set explicitly and the
default is inferred from the target triple or SDK version, it should
use a maximum default of iOS 10.99.99.
rdar://problem/32230613
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34529
llvm-svn: 306922
Allow ODR for ObjC/C in the sense that we won't keep more that
one definition around (merge them). However, ensure the decl
pass the structural compatibility check in C11 6.2.7/1, for that,
reuse the structural equivalence checks used by the ASTImporter.
Few other considerations:
- Create error diagnostics for tag types mismatches and thread
them into the structural equivalence checks.
- Note that by doing this we only support redefinition between types
that are considered "compatible types" by C.
This is mixed approach of the suggestions discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-March/053257.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31778
rdar://problem/31909368
llvm-svn: 306918
Redeclaration lookup should never find hidden enumerators in C, because
they do not have linkage (C11 6.2.2/6)
The linkage of an enumerator should be VisibleNoLinkage, and
isHiddenDeclarationVisible should be checking hasExternalFormalLinkage.
This is was reviewed as part of D31778, but splitted into a different
commit for clarity.
rdar://problem/31909368
llvm-svn: 306917
Summary:
This patch aims to fix the bug reported at
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33189. Clang hits an assertion
when a template destructor declaration is present. This is caused by
later processing that does not expect to encounter a template when
looking at a destructor. The resolution is to treat the destructor as
being not declared when later processing is interested in the properties
of the destructor of a class.
Reviewers: rcraik, hubert.reinterpretcast, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33833
Patch by Kuang He!
llvm-svn: 306905
It was reverted in r305460 but the issue appears to only break our self-host
libcxx modules bot. Reapplying it will give us a chance to get a reproducer and
fix the issue.
llvm-svn: 306903
The root cause of the issues reported in D32406 and D34680 is that clang
instruments functions without bodies. Make it stop doing that, and also
teach it how to use old (incorrectly generated) profiles without
crashing.
llvm-svn: 306883
This is a short-term fix for PR33650 aimed to get the modules build bots green again.
Remove all the places where we use the LLVM_YAML_IS_(FLOW_)?SEQUENCE_VECTOR
macros to try to locally specialize a global template for a global type. That's
not how C++ works.
Instead, we now centrally define how to format vectors of fundamental types and
of string (std::string and StringRef). We use flow formatting for the former
cases, since that's the obvious right thing to do; in the latter case, it's
less clear what the right choice is, but flow formatting is really bad for some
cases (due to very long strings), so we pick block formatting. (Many of the
cases that were using flow formatting for strings are improved by this change.)
Other than the flow -> block formatting change for some vectors of strings,
this should result in no functionality change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34907
Corresponding LLVM change is r306878.
llvm-svn: 306881
Douglas Gregor