It was a bit too aggressive.
With this patch, we keep on breaking here:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaa,
"aaaaaaa"
"bbbbbbb");
But don't break in:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaa, aaaaaaaa("aaaaaaa"
"bbbbbbb"));
llvm-svn: 240024
Before:
var func =
function() {
doSomething();
};
After:
var func =
function() {
doSomething();
};
This is a very narrow special case which fixes most of the discrepency
with what our users do. In the long run, we should try to come up with
a more generic fix for indenting these.
llvm-svn: 240014
In essence this is meant to consistently indent multiline strings by a
fixed amount of spaces from the start of the line. Don't do this in
cases where it wouldn't help anyway.
Before:
someFunction(aaaaa,
"aaaaa"
"bbbbb");
After:
someFunction(aaaaa, "aaaaa"
"bbbbb");
llvm-svn: 240004
This makes this consistent with non-typescript enums.
Also shuffle the language-dependent stuff in mustBreakBefore to a
single location.
Patch initiated by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 239894
Before, these would not properly detected because of the char/string
literal found when re-lexing after the first `:
var x = `'`; // comment with matching quote '
var x = `"`; // comment with matching quote "
llvm-svn: 239693
Before:
int c = []() -> int *{ return 2; }();
After:
int c = []() -> int * { return 2; }();
Based on patch by James Dennett (http://reviews.llvm.org/D10410), thank you!
llvm-svn: 239600
statement.
When an exported function would follow a class declaration, it would not
be recognized as a stand-alone function. That would then collapse the
following line with the current one, e.g.
class C {}
export function f() {} var x;
llvm-svn: 239592
In the long run, these two might be independent or we might to only
allow specific combinations. Until we have a corresponding request,
however, it is hard to do the right thing and choose the right
configuration options. Thus, just don't touch the options yet and
just modify the behavior slightly.
llvm-svn: 239531
The following example used to crash clang-format.
#define a\
/**/}
Adjusting the indentation level cache for the line starting with the
comment would lead to an out-of-bounds array read.
llvm-svn: 239521
Before clang-format would e.g. add a space into
#define Q_FOREACH(x, y)
which turns this into a non-function-like macro.
Patch by Strager Neds, thank you!
llvm-svn: 239513
assignments as enums.
Top level object literals are treated as enums, and their k/v pairs are put on
separate lines:
X.Y = {
A: 1,
B: 2
};
However assignments within blocks should not be affected:
function x() {
y = {a:1, b:2};
}
This change fixes the second case. Patch by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 239462
I have not succeeded in writing a proper test case for this yet and we
also need to solve the underlying fundamental problem of trying too
many combinations with nested blocks (basically this somewhat works
around our Dijkstra algorithm). Preventing this linebreak is good
anyways as usually the penalties never make us choose it (that's why I
can't create a test) and it also looks ugly.
Also cleaned up state comparison code that I discovered while hunting
this down.
llvm-svn: 239398
Before:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t) -> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a)
.aaaaaaaa());
After:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t)
-> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a).aaaaaaaa());
Also add a test case for a difficult template parsing case I stumbled accross.
Needs fixing.
llvm-svn: 239149
This is a more correct representation than using "Equality" introduced
in r238942 which was a quick fix to solve an actual regression.
According to the typescript spec, arrows behave like "low-precedence"
assignments.
Before:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
After:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
llvm-svn: 239137
Before:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> =
[new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
llvm-svn: 238909
Before:
someFunction(() =>
{
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
After:
someFunction(() => {
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
This is still bad, but at least it is consistent with what we do for other
function literals. Added corresponding tests.
llvm-svn: 238736
Specifically adhere to LLVM Coding Standards (no 'else' after
return/break/continue) and remove yet another implementation of
paren counting. We already have enough of those in the
UnwrappedLineParser.
No functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 238672
method expressions and array literals. They should not bind stronger
than regular parentheses or the braces of braced lists.
Specific test case in JavaScript:
Before:
var aaaaa: List<
SomeThing> = [new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
llvm-svn: 238400
A definintion like this could not be formatted at all:
constructor({aa}: {
aa?: string,
aaaaaaaa?: string,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?: boolean,
aaaaaa?: List<string>
}) {
}
llvm-svn: 238291
Daniel Jasper