AAPCS64 says that it's up to the platform to specify whether x18 is
reserved, and a first step on that way is to add a flag controlling
it.
From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz>
llvm-svn: 226664
Even sleep(1) lead to episodical flakes on some machines.
Use an invisible by tsan barrier to enforce required execution order instead.
This makes the tests deterministic and faster.
llvm-svn: 226659
Previously we always stored 4 bytes of origin at the destination address
even for 8-byte (and longer) stores.
This should fix rare missing, or incorrect, origin stacks in MSan reports.
llvm-svn: 226658
Implement microMIPS 16-bit unconditional branch instruction B.
Implemented 16-bit microMIPS unconditional instruction has real name B16, and
B is an alias which expands to either B16 or BEQ according to the rules:
b 256 --> b16 256 # R_MICROMIPS_PC10_S1
b 12256 --> beq $zero, $zero, 12256 # R_MICROMIPS_PC16_S1
b label --> beq $zero, $zero, label # R_MICROMIPS_PC16_S1
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3514
llvm-svn: 226657
Because in its primary function pass the combiner is run repeatedly over
the same function until doing so produces no changes, it is essentially
to not re-allocate the worklist. However, as a utility, the more common
pattern would be to put a limited set of instructions in the worklist
rather than the entire function body. That is also the more likely
pattern when used by the new pass manager.
The result is a very light weight combiner that does the visiting with
a separable worklist. This can then be wrapped up in a helper function
for users that want a combiner utility, or as I have here it can be
wrapped up in a pass which manages the iterations used when combining an
entire function's instructions.
Hopefully this removes some of the worst of the interface warts that
became apparant with the last patch here. However, there is clearly more
work. I've again left some FIXMEs for the most egregious. The ones that
stick out to me are the exposure of the worklist and IR builder as
public members, and the use of pointers rather than references. However,
fixing these is likely to be much more mechanical and less interesting
so I didn't want to touch them in this patch.
llvm-svn: 226655
SimplifyLibCalls utility by sinking it into the specific call part of
the combiner.
This will avoid us needing to do any contortions to build this object in
a subsequent refactoring I'm doing and seems generally better factored.
We don't need this utility everywhere and it carries no interesting
state so we might as well build it on demand.
llvm-svn: 226654
We didn't consider any alignment attributes on an EnumDecl when
calculating alignment.
While we are here, ignore alignment specifications on typedef types if
one is used as the underlying type. Otherwise, weird things happen:
enum Y : int;
Y y;
typedef int __attribute__((aligned(64))) u;
enum Y : u {};
What is the alignment of 'Y'? It would be more consistent with the
overall design of enums with fixed underlying types to consider the
underlying type's UnqualifiedDesugaredType.
This fixes PR22279.
llvm-svn: 226653
MemoryAccess function consumes ~4K of stack in debug mode,
in significant part due to the unrolled loop.
And gtest gives only 4K of stack to death test
threads, which causes stack overflows in debug mode.
llvm-svn: 226644
The code is able to statically link the simplest case of:
int main() { return 0; }
* Only works with ARM code - no Thumb code, no interwork (-marm -mno-thumb-interwork)
* musl libc built with no interwork and no Thumb code
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6716
From: Denis Protivensky <dprotivensky@accesssoftek.com>
llvm-svn: 226643
a more direct approach: a type-erased glorified function pointer. Now we
can pass a function pointer into this for the easy case and we can even
pass a lambda into it in the interesting case in the instruction
combiner.
I'll be using this shortly to simplify the interfaces to InstCombiner,
but this helps pave the way and seems like a better design for the
libcall simplifier utility.
llvm-svn: 226640
aarch64-linux kernel has configurable 39, 42 or 47 bit virtual address
space. Most distros AFAIK use 42-bit VA right now, but there are also
39-bit VA users too. The ppc64 handling can be used for this just fine
and support all the 3 sizes.
There are other issues, like allocator32 not really being able to support
the larger addres spaces, and hardcoded 39-bit address space size in other
macros.
Patch by Jakub Jelinek.
llvm-svn: 226639
glibc recently changed ABI on aarch64-linux:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=5c40c3bab2fddaca8cfe12d75944d1fef8adf1a4
Instead of having unsigned short mode; unsigned short __pad1; it now has
unsigned int mode; field in ipc_perm structure.
This patch allows to build against the recent glibc and disables the
ipc_perm.mode verification for older versions of glibc.
I think it shouldn't be a big deal even for older glibcs, I couldn't find
any place which would actually care about the exact mode field, rather than
the whole structure, appart from the CHECK_SIZE_AND_OFFSET macro.
Patch by Jakub Jelinek
llvm-svn: 226637
Most of the time, we can use context information just fine to choose a language (i.e. the language of the frame that the root object was defined in, if any); but in some cases, synthetic children may be fabricated as root frame-less entities, and then we wouldn't know any better
This patch allows (internal) synthetic child providers to set a display language on the children they generate, should they so choose
llvm-svn: 226634
We used to manage the state whether we are in a group or not
using a counter. The counter is incremented by one if we jump from
end-group to start-group, and decremented by one if we don't.
The counter was assumed to be either zero or one, but obviously it
could be negative (if there's a group which is not repeated at all).
This is a fix for that issue.
llvm-svn: 226632
introduced subtle bugs in two places in
RegisterContextLLDB::GetFullUnwindPlanForFrame where
it specifically wanted to get an eh_frame unwind plan
and was using "Get CallSite UnwindPlan" as synonymous
with that. But now we have two different types of
unwind plan that can be returned in that case, and
compact unwind won't behaves as needed.
<rdar://problem/19528559>
llvm-svn: 226631
We were referring to hardcoded paths /bin/ls and /bin/cat. For
the purposes of this test, the actual value it's set to doesn't
matter, and it might as well be a non-existent path. All that
matters is that the before and after values have to match, and
that trailing whitespace is stripped. On Windows FileSpec
(correctly) converts /bin/ls to D:\bin\ls though, so the before
and after values won't match. So this patch just correctly builds
up a valid path in a platform-agnostic manner, and verifies that
it matches before and after the set.
llvm-svn: 226625
be corrected.
This fixes PR22250, which exposed the bug where if there's more than one
TypoExpr in the arguments, once one failed to be corrected none of the
TypoExprs after it would be handled at all thanks to an early return.
llvm-svn: 226624
Changed the AVX1 tests register spill tail call to return a xmm like the SSE42 version - makes doing diffs between them a lot easier without affecting the spills themselves.
llvm-svn: 226623
The SSE42 version of the AVX1 float stack folding tests will be added shortly, this renames the AVX1 file so that the files will be near each other in a directory listing to help ensure they are kept in sync.
llvm-svn: 226620
This creates a small internal pass which runs the InstCombiner over
a function. This is the hard part of porting InstCombine to the new pass
manager, as at this point none of the code in InstCombine has access to
a Pass object any longer.
The resulting interface for the InstCombiner is pretty terrible. I'm not
planning on leaving it that way. The key thing missing is that we need
to separate the worklist from the combiner a touch more. Once that's
done, it should be possible for *any* part of LLVM to just create
a worklist with instructions, populate it, and then combine it until
empty. The pass will just be the (obvious and important) special case of
doing that for an entire function body.
For now, this is the first increment of factoring to make all of this
work.
llvm-svn: 226618
At some point we will need to either provide a pexpect equivalent
on Windows, or provide some other method of doing out-of-process
tests.
Even with a pexpect replacement, it may be worth re-evaluating
some of these tests to see if they would be better served as
in-process tests. The larger issue of coming up with a pexpect
replacement on Windows is tracked in http://llvm.org/pr22274.
llvm-svn: 226614
Tim Northover