finds nothing), and the current instantiation has dependent base
classes, treat the qualified lookup as if it referred to an unknown
specialization. Fixes PR6031.
llvm-svn: 93433
name a template, when they occur in a base-specifier. This is one of
the (few) places where we know for sure that an identifier followed by
a '<' must be a template name, so we can diagnose and recover well:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:9:16: error: missing
'template'
keyword prior to dependent template name 'T::apply'
struct X1 : T::apply<U> { }; // expected-error{{missing 'template' ...
^
template
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:12:13: error: unknown
template name
'vector'
struct X2 : vector<T> { }; // expected-error{{unknown template name
'vector'}}
^
2 diagnostics generated.
llvm-svn: 93257
I said to myself, self, why don't you go add a couple of parameters to a method
and then fail to use them, and I thought that sounded like a pretty good idea,
so I did it.
llvm-svn: 93233
sequence. Lots of small relevant changes. Fixes some serious problems with
ambiguous conversions; also possibly improves associated diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 93214
(C++ [temp.mem]p5-6), which involves template argument deduction based
on the type named, e.g., given
struct X { template<typename T> operator T*(); } x;
when we call
x.operator int*();
we perform template argument deduction to determine that T=int. This
template argument deduction is needed for template specialization and
explicit instantiation, e.g.,
template<> X::operator float*() { /* ... */ }
and when calling or otherwise naming a conversion function (as in the
first example).
This fixes PR5742 and PR5762, although there's some remaining ugliness
that's causing out-of-line definitions of conversion function
templates to fail. I'll look into that separately.
llvm-svn: 93162
C++ grammatical constructs that show up in top-level (namespace-level)
declarations, member declarations, template declarations, statements,
expressions, conditions, etc. For example, we now provide a pattern
for
static_cast<type>(expr)
when we can have an expression, or
using namespace identifier;
when we can have a using directive.
Also, improves the results of code completion at the beginning of a
top-level declaration. Previously, we would see value names (function
names, global variables, etc.); now we see types, namespace names,
etc., but no values.
llvm-svn: 93134
1. Add helper class for sema checks for target attributes
2. Add helper class for codegen of target attributes
As a proof-of-concept - implement msp430's 'interrupt' attribute.
llvm-svn: 93118
not just the viable ones. This is reasonable because the most common use of
deleted functions is to exclude some implicit conversion during calls; users
therefore will want to figure out why some other options were excluded.
Started sorting overload results. Right now it just sorts by location in the
translation unit (after putting viable functions first), but we can do better than
that.
Changed bool OnlyViable parameter to PrintOverloadCandidates to an enum for better
self-documentation.
llvm-svn: 92990
piece of the declaration. The '@' and the 'end' are separate tokens,
and require two SourceLocations to accurately track.
This change was motivated because ObjCContainerDecl::getSourceRange()
would previously not return the entire range of the declaration (the
'end' would be left off).
llvm-svn: 92891
deterministic and work properly with templates. Once a class that
needs a vtable has been defined, we now do one if two things:
- If the class has no key function, we place the class on a list of
classes whose virtual functions will need to be "marked" at the
end of the translation unit. The delay until the end of the
translation unit is needed because we might see template
specializations of these virtual functions.
- If the class has a key function, we do nothing; when the key
function is defined, the class will be placed on the
aforementioned list.
At the end of the translation unit, we "mark" all of the virtual
functions of the classes on the list as used, possibly causing
template instantiation and other classes to be added to the
list. This gets LLVM's lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp compiling again.
llvm-svn: 92821
constructs:
- Instance variable lookup ("foo->ivar" and, in instance methods, "ivar")
- Property name lookup ("foo.prop")
- Superclasses
- Various places where a class name is required
- Protocol names (e.g., id<proto>)
This seems to cover many of the common places where typos could occur.
llvm-svn: 92449
typo.cpp:22:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'radious'; did
you mean 'radius'?
return radious * pi;
^~~~~~~
radius
This was super-easy, since we already had decent recovery by looking
for names in dependent base classes.
llvm-svn: 92341
tring str2;
we produce the following diagnostic + fix-it:
typo.cpp:15:1: error: unknown type name 'tring'; did you mean 'string'?
tring str2;
^~~~~
string
To make this really useful, we'll need to introduce typo correction in
many more places (wherever we do name lookup), and implement
declaration-vs-expression heuristics that cope with typos
better. However, for now this will handle the simple cases where we
already get good "unknown type name" diagnostics.
The LookupVisibleDecls functions are intended to be used by code
completion as well as typo correction; that refactoring will happen
later.
llvm-svn: 92308
explicitly-specified template arguments are enough to determine the
instantiation, and either template argument deduction fails or is not
performed in that context, we can resolve the template-id down to a
function template specialization (so sayeth C++0x
[temp.arg.explicit]p3). Fixes PR5811.
llvm-svn: 91852
Because of the rules of base-class lookup* and the restrictions on typedefs, it
was actually impossible for this to cause any problems more serious than the
spurious acceptance of
template <class T> class A : B<A> { ... };
instead of
template <class T> class A : B<A<T> > { ... };
but I'm sure we can all agree that that is a very important restriction which
is well worth making another Parser->Sema call for.
(*) n.b. clang++ does not implement these rules correctly; we are not ignoring
non-type names
llvm-svn: 91792
the redeclaration problems in the [temp.explicit]p3 testcase worse, but I can
live with that; they'll need to be fixed more holistically anyhow.
llvm-svn: 91771
different functions and pick the function at lookup initialization time.
In theory we could actually divide the criteria functions into N different
functions for the N cases, but it's so not worth it.
Among other things, lets us invoke LookupQualifiedName without recomputing
IDNS info every time.
Do some refactoring in SemaDecl to avoid an awkward special case in LQN
that was only necessary for redeclaration testing for anonymous structs/unions ---
which could be done more efficiently with a scoped lookup anyway.
llvm-svn: 91676
new InitializationSequence. This fixes some bugs (e.g., PR5808),
changed some diagnostics, and caused more churn than expected. What's
new:
- InitializationSequence now has a "C conversion sequence" category
and step kind, which falls back to
- Changed the diagnostics for returns to always have the result type
of the function first and the type of the expression second.
CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints to peform checking in C.
- Improved ASTs for initialization of return values. The ASTs now
capture all of the temporaries we need to create, but
intentionally do not bind the tempoary that is actually returned,
so that it won't get destroyed twice.
- Make sure to perform an (elidable!) copy of the class object that
is returned from a class.
- Fix copy elision in CodeGen to properly see through the
subexpressions that occur with elidable copies.
- Give "new" its own entity kind; as with return values and thrown
objects, we don't bind the expression so we don't call a
destructor for it.
Note that, with this patch, I've broken returning move-only types in
C++0x. We'll fix it later, when we tackle NRVO.
llvm-svn: 91669
function in a C++ call using an arbitrary call-expression type.
Actually exploit this to fix the recovery implemented earlier.
The diagnostic is still iffy, though.
llvm-svn: 91538
used as expressions). In dependent contexts, try to recover by doing a lookup
in previously-dependent base classes. We get better diagnostics out, but
unfortunately the recovery fails: we need to turn it into a method call
expression, not a bare call expression. Thus this is still a WIP.
llvm-svn: 91525
InitializationSequence to perform the actual initialization.
Also, introduced the notion of a tree of initialized entities, so that
we can know where an initialization began when dealing with nested
initializations (as occur when performing list initialization). This
will, eventually, be useful for producing better diagnostics when list
initialization fails, because we can show the path from the top-level
object being initialized down to the actual subobject where
initialization failed.
llvm-svn: 91516
than using its own partial implementation of initialization.
Switched CheckInitializerTypes over to
InitializedEntity/InitializationKind, to help move us closer to
InitializationSequence.
Added InitializedEntity::getName() to retrieve the name of the entity,
for diagnostics that care about such things.
Implemented support for default initialization in
InitializationSequence.
Clean up the determination of the "source expressions" for an
initialization sequence in InitializationSequence::Perform.
Taught CXXConstructExpr to store more location information.
llvm-svn: 91492
in a potentially potentially evaluated context, queue those
diagnostics and only emit them if the context ends up being
potentially evaluated. This completes the fix for PR5761.
llvm-svn: 91213
is difficult because they're so terribly, terribly ambiguous.
We implement access declarations in terms of using declarations, which is
quite reasonable. However, we should really persist the access/using
distinction in the AST and use the appropriate name in diagnostics. This
isn't a priority, so I'll just file a PR and hope someone else does it. :)
llvm-svn: 91095
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
Douglas Gregor