Summary:
vfork is not ASan-friendly because it modifies stack shadow in the
parent process address space. While it is possible to compensate for that with, for example,
__asan_handle_no_return before each call to _exit or execve and friends, simply replacing
vfork with fork looks like by far the easiest solution.
Posix compliant programs can not detect the difference between vfork and fork.
Fixes https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/925
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44587
llvm-svn: 327752
Summary:
When in a gmodules-like debugging scenario, you can have a parent decl context
that gets imported from an external AST. When this happens, we must be careful
to complete this type before adding children to it, otherwise it sometimes
results in a crash.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43592
llvm-svn: 327750
Summary: Following-up the refactoring of mmap interceptors, adding a new common option to detect PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC pages request.
Patch by David CARLIER
Reviewers: vitalybuka, vsk
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: krytarowski, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44194
llvm-svn: 327747
This prevents a crash in SelectionDAGDumper with -debug when trying to print mem operands if one of the registers in the addressing mode comes from a load.
llvm-svn: 327744
Avoid scheduling two loads in such a way that they would end up in the
same packet. If there is a load in a packet, try to schedule a non-load
next.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 327742
Reid pointed out the string table for supporting long section names is a
BFD extension and the comments should reflect that. Explicitly spell out
link.exe's and binutil's behavior around section names and the rationale
for LLD's behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42659
llvm-svn: 327736
Now the Windows mangling modes ('w' and 'x') do not do any mangling for
symbols starting with '?'. This means that clang can stop adding the
hideous '\01' leading escape. This means LLVM debug logs are less likely
to contain ASCII escape characters and it will be easier to copy and
paste MS symbol names from IR.
Finally.
For non-Windows platforms, names starting with '?' still get IR
mangling, so once clang stops escaping MS C++ names, we will get extra
'_' prefixing on MachO. That's fine, since it is currently impossible to
construct a triple that uses the MS C++ ABI in clang and emits macho
object files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D7775
llvm-svn: 327734
Summary:
Previously we tried too hard to uphold the fiction that destructor
variants work like they do on Itanium throughout the ABI-neutral parts
of clang. This lead to MS C++ ABI incompatiblities and other bugs. Now,
-mconstructor-aliases will no longer control this ABI detail, and clang
-cc1's LLVM IR output will be this much closer to the clang driver's.
Based on a patch by Zahira Ammarguellat:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39063
I've tried to move the logic that Zahira added into MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp.
There is only one ABI-specific detail sticking out, and that is in
CodeGenModule::getAddrOfCXXStructor, where we collapse complete dtors to
base dtors in the MS ABI.
This fixes PR32990.
Reviewers: erichkeane, zahiraam, majnemer, rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44505
llvm-svn: 327732
Previously, we called the same functions twice with a bool flag determining whether we should look for ADDSUB or SUBADD. It would be more efficient to run the code once and detect either pattern with a flag to tell which type it found.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44540
llvm-svn: 327730
For other regions, the error message contains a good indication of the
problem, and there, in general, nothing helpful we can print.
Error pointer to the problematic expression seems enough.
rdar://37323555
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44409
llvm-svn: 327727
I should have done it in rL327558 / D43162, but forgot..
I'm not 100% sure about the text, but i don't think
it warrants a whole new differential revision.
llvm-svn: 327725
We previously avoided inserting these moves during isel in a few cases which is implemented using a whitelist of opcodes. But it's too difficult to generate a perfect list of opcodes to whitelist. Especially with AVX512F without AVX512VL using 512 bit vectors to implement some 128/256 bit operations. Since isel is done bottoms up, we'd have to check the VT and opcode and subtarget in order to determine whether an EXTRACT_SUBREG would be generated for some operations.
So instead of doing that, this patch adds a post processing step that detects when the moves are unnecesssary after isel. At that point any EXTRACT_SUBREGs would have already been created and appear in the DAG. So then we just need to ensure the input to the move isn't one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44289
llvm-svn: 327724
This builds on the work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D44287. It turned out supporting fcmp was much easier than I realized, so let's do that now.
As an aside, our -O3 handling of a floating point IVs leaves a lot to be desired. We do convert the float IV to an integer IV, but do so late enough that many other optimizations are missed (e.g. we don't vectorize).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44542
llvm-svn: 327722
Summary:
When parser backtracks, we might receive multiple code completion
callbacks.
Previously we had a failing assertion there, now we take first results
and hope they are good enough.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44567
llvm-svn: 327717
Summary: This disallows patterns like `[ext.name\n]` in text protos.
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44569
llvm-svn: 327716
AnyReg is just for the assembler and it is better to have it as not
allocatable in order to simplify (make more intuitive) the RegPressureSets.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 327715
JumpThreading iterates over F until the IR quiesces. Transforming
unreachable BBs increases compile time and it is also possible to
never stabilize causing JumpThreading to hang. An older attempt at
fixing this problem was D3991 where removeUnreachableBlocks(F)
was called before JumpThreading began. This has a few drawbacks:
* expensive - the routine attempts to fix up the IR to identify
additional BBs that can be removed along with unreachable BBs.
* aggressive - does not identify and preserve the shape of the IR.
At a minimum it does not preserve loop hierarchies.
* invasive - altering reachable blocks it may disrupt IR shapes
that could have otherwise been JumpThreaded.
This patch avoids removeUnreachableBlocks(F) and instead tracks
unreachable BBs in a SmallPtrSet using DominatorTree to validate the
initial state of all BBs. We then rely on subsequent passes to identify
and remove these unreachable blocks from F.
Reviewers: dberlin, sebpop, kuhar, dinesh.d
Reviewed by: sebpop, kuhar
Subscribers: hiraditya, uabelho, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44177
llvm-svn: 327713
Summary:
This patch moves the draft manager closer to the edge of Clangd, from
ClangdServer to ClangdLSPServer. This will make it easier to implement
incremental document sync, by making ClangdServer only deal with
complete documents.
As a result, DraftStore doesn't have to deal with versioning, and thus
its API can be simplified. It is replaced by a StringMap in
ClangdServer holding a current version number for each file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44408
llvm-svn: 327711
Summary:
Currently the LLVM MC assembler is able to convert e.g.
vmov.i32 d0, #0xabababab
(which is technically invalid) into a valid instruction
vmov.i8 d0, #0xab
this patch adds support for vmov.i64 and for cases with the resulting
load types other than i8, e.g.:
vmov.i32 d0, #0xab00ab00 ->
vmov.i16 d0, #0xab00
Reviewers: olista01, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: rengolin, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, rogfer01, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44467
llvm-svn: 327709
Summary: We weren't penalizing cases where the raw string prefix goes over the column limit.
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44563
llvm-svn: 327708
More generally, this permits a template to be specialized in any scope in which
it could be defined, so this also supersedes DR44 and DR374 (the latter of
which we previously only implemented in C++11 mode onwards due to unclarity as
to whether it was a DR).
llvm-svn: 327705
Summary:
Currently the check is incorrect and the following invalid
instruction is accepted and incorrectly assembled:
vmov.i32 d2, #0x00a500a6
This patch fixes the issue.
Reviewers: olista01, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar, rogfer01, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44460
llvm-svn: 327704
Summary:
This patch implements a unified way of cleaning the build folder of each
test. This is done by completely removing the build folder before each
test, in the respective setUp() method. Previously, we were using a
combination of several methods, each with it's own drawbacks:
- nuking the entire build tree before running dotest: the issue here is
that this did not take place if you ran dotest manually
- running "make clean" before the main "make" target: this relied on the
clean command being correctly implemented. This was usually true, but
not always.
- for files which were not produced by make, each python file was
responsible for ensuring their deleting, using a variety of methods.
With this approach, the previous methods become redundant. I remove the
first two, since they are centralized. For the other various bits of
clean-up code in python files, I indend to delete it when I come
across it.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: emaste, ki.stfu, mgorny, eraman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44526
llvm-svn: 327703