If the loaded memory size was smaller than the result size, this would
produce out of bounds memory accesses. I'm wondering if we need a
distinct narrow memory legalize action type, since a case I care about
is decomposing a 4-byte unaligned access into 4 extending loads, which
would leave the original result register type. I'm currently awkwardly
using narrowScalar to handle unaligned accesses that need to be split.
Load extra bits if suitably aligned. This allows using widened
3-vector loads on SI, and fixes legalization for <9 x s32> (which LSV
apparently forms frequently on lowered kernel argument lists).
Fix incorrectly treating these as legal on SI. This should emit a
64-bit store and a 32-bit store.
I think all of the load and store rules are just about complete, but
due for a rewrite.
The legalizer produces a lot of these, and they make reading legalized
MIR annoying. For some reason, this does seem to sometimes introduce
copies of implicit def, which is dumb.
If we have s_pack_* instructions, legalize this to
G_BUILD_VECTOR_TRUNC from s32 elements. This is closer to how how the
s_pack_* instructions really behave.
If we don't have s_pack_ instructions, expand this by creating a merge
to s32 and bitcasting. This expands to the expected bit operations. I
think this eventually should go in a new bitcast legalize action type
in LegalizerHelper.
We already directly emit the shift operations in RegBankSelect for the
vector case. This could possibly be cleaned up, but I also may want to
defer doing this expansion to selection anyway. I'll see about that
when I try to actually match VOP3P instructions.
This breaks the selection of the build_vector since tablegen doesn't
know how to match G_BUILD_VECTOR_TRUNC yet, so just xfail it for now.
Summary:
G_GEP is rather poorly named. It's a simple pointer+scalar addition and
doesn't support any of the complexities of getelementptr. I therefore
propose that we rename it. There's a G_PTR_MASK so let's follow that
convention and go with G_PTR_ADD
Reviewers: volkan, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rovka, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, arphaman, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69734
There's still a lot more to do, but this handles decomposing due to
alignment. I've gotten it to the point where nothing crashes or
infinite loops the legalizer.
llvm-svn: 371533
Matt Arsenault