We already know where the CUDA SDK is, so there is no point in
letting Clang search for it again and possibly finding no or
a different installation.
--cuda-path is supported since the beginning of CUDA support in
Clang, so making this required doesn't impose additional restrictions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46930
llvm-svn: 332495
Move all logic related to selecting the bitcode compiler and linker
into a new file and dynamically test required compiler flags. This
also adds -fcuda-rdc for Clang trunk as previously attempted in D44992
which fixes the build.
As a result this change also enables building the library by default
if all prerequisites are met.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46901
llvm-svn: 332494
That's what we really need to link the CUDA plugin against,
not the CUDA runtime API in CUDA_LIBRARIES! While the latter
comes with the CUDA SDK, the Driver API is installed with
the kernel driver and there is at most one per system. As
fallback we can use the stubs library distributed with the
CUDA SDK for linking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42643
llvm-svn: 323787
These are needed by both libraries, so we can do that in a
common namespace and unify configuration parameters.
Also make sure that the user isn't requesting libomptarget
if the library cannot be built on the system. Issue an error
in that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40081
llvm-svn: 319342
Jonas Hahnfeld