Summary:
The code previously assumed the source of the bitcast in the combined
pattern was a vector type, but this is not always true. This patch
adds a check to avoid an assertion failure in that case.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80164
Summary:
This reflects changes in the spec proposal made since basic arithmetic
was first implemented.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80174
Summary:
This new custom DAG combine fixes a codegen issue with the
wasm_simd128.h intrinsics. Clang lowers the
return (v128_t)(__f32x4){__a, __a, __a, __a};
body of f32x4_splat to a splat shuffle of a bitcasted vector, as seen
in the new simd-shuffle-bitcast.ll test. The bitcast interfered with
the target-independent DAG combine that combines splat shuffles into
BUILD_VECTOR nodes, so this patch introduces a new custom DAG combine
to hoist the bitcast out of the shuffle, allowing the
target-independent combine to work as intended.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80021
Summary:
Move instructions that have recently been implemented in V8 from the
`unimplemented-simd128` target feature to the `simd128` target
feature. The updated instructions match the update at
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/223.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79973
BuildMI requires this debug loc to be from the same sub program as the variable metadata passed in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80019
Summary:
As proposed in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/122. Since
these instructions are not yet merged to the SIMD spec proposal, this
patch makes them entirely opt-in by surfacing them only through LLVM
intrinsics and clang builtins. If these instructions are made
official, these intrinsics and builtins should be replaced with simple
instruction patterns.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79742
Summary:
Although using `__builtin_shufflevector` and the `shufflevector`
instruction works fine, they are not opaque to the optimizer. As a
result, DAGCombine can potentially reduce the number of shuffles and
change the shuffle masks. This is unexpected behavior for users of the
WebAssembly SIMD intrinsics who have crafted their shuffles to
optimize the code generated by engines. This patch solves the problem
by adding a new shuffle intrinsic that is opaque to the optimizers in
line with the decision of the WebAssembly SIMD contributors at
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/issues/196#issuecomment-622494748. In
the future we may implement custom DAG combines to properly optimize
shuffles and replace this solution.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66983
Summary:
The WebAssembly backend automatically lowers atomic operations and TLS
to nonatomic operations and non-TLS data when either are present and
the atomics or bulk-memory features are not present, respectively. The
resulting object is no longer thread-safe, so the linker has to be
told not to allow it to be linked into a module with shared
memory. This was previously done by disallowing the 'atomics' feature,
which prevented any objct with its atomic operations or TLS removed
from being linked with any object containing atomics or TLS, and
therefore preventing it from being linked into a module with shared
memory since shared memory requires atomics.
However, as of https://github.com/WebAssembly/threads/issues/144, the
validation rules are relaxed to allow atomic operations to validate
with unshared memories, which makes it perfectly safe to link an
object with stripped atomics and TLS with another object that still
contains TLS and atomics as long as the resulting module has an
unshared memory. To allow this kind of link, this patch disallows a
pseudo-feature 'shared-mem' rather than 'atomics' to communicate to
the linker that the object is not thread-safe. This means that the
'atomics' feature is available to accurately reflect whether or not an
object has atomics enabled.
As a drive-by tweak, this change also requires that bulk-memory be
enabled in addition to atomics in order to use shared memory. This is
because initializing shared memories requires bulk-memory operations.
Reviewers: aheejin, sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79542
Make the kind of cost explicit throughout the cost model which,
apart from making the cost clear, will allow the generic parts to
calculate better costs. It will also allow some backends to
approximate and correlate the different costs if they wish. Another
benefit is that it will also help simplify the cost model around
immediate and intrinsic costs, where we currently have multiple APIs.
RFC thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/141263.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79002
Summary:
This fixes a few things that are connected. It is very hard to provide
an independent test case for each of those fixes, because they are
interconnected and sometimes one masks another. The provided test case
triggers some of those bugs below but not all.
---
1. Background:
`placeBlockMarker` takes a BB, and if the BB is a destination of some
branch, it places `end_block` marker there, and computes the nearest
common dominator of all predecessors (what we call 'header') and places
a `block` marker there.
When we first place markers, we traverse BBs from top to bottom. For
example, when there are 5 BBs A, B, C, D, and E and B, D, and E are
branch destinations, if mark the BB given to `placeBlockMarker` with `*`
and draw a rectangle representing the border of `block` and `end_block`
markers, the process is going to look like
```
-------
----- |-----|
--- |---| ||---||
|A| ||A|| |||A|||
--- --> |---| --> ||---||
*B | B | || B ||
C | C | || C ||
D ----- |-----|
E *D | D |
E -------
*E
```
which means when we first place markers, we go from inner to outer
scopes. So when we place a `block` marker, if the header already
contains other `block` or `try` marker, it has to belong to an inner
scope, so the existing `block`/`try` markers should go _after_ the new
marker. This was the assumption we had.
But after placing all markers we run `fixUnwindMismatches` function.
There we do some control flow transformation and create some branches,
and we call `placeBlockMarker` again to place `block`/`end_block`
markers for those newly created branches. We can't assume that we are
traversing branch destination BBs from top to bottom now because we are
basically inserting some new markers in the middle of existing markers.
Fix:
In `placeBlockMarker`, we don't have the assumption that the BB given is
in the order of top to bottom, and when placing `block` markers,
calculates whether existing `block` or `try` markers are inner or
outer scopes with respect to the current scope.
---
2. Background:
In `fixUnwindMismatches`, when there is a call whose correct unwind
destination mismatches the current destination after initially placing
`try` markers, we wrap that with a new nested `try`/`catch`/`end` and
jump to the correct handler within the new `catch`. The correct handler
code is split as a separate BB from its original EH pad so it can be
branched to. Here's an example:
- Before
```
mbb:
call @foo <- Unwind destination mismatch!
wrong-ehpad:
catch
...
cont:
end_try
...
correct-ehpad:
catch
[handler code]
```
- After
```
mbb:
try (new)
call @foo
nested-ehpad: (new)
catch (new)
local.set n / drop (new)
br %handleri (new)
nested-end: (new)
end_try (new)
wrong-ehpad:
catch
...
cont:
end_try
...
correct-ehpad:
catch
local.set n / drop (new)
handler: (new)
end_try
[handler code]
```
Note that after this transformation, it is possible there are no calls
to actually unwind to `correct-ehpad` here. `call @foo` now
branches to `handler`, and there can be no other calls to unwind to
`correct-ehpad`. In this case `correct-ehpad` does not have any
predecessors anymore.
This can cause a bug in `placeBlockMarker`, because we may need to place
`end_block` marker in `handler`, and `placeBlockMarker` computes the
nearest common dominator of all predecessors. If one of `handler`'s
predecessor (here `correct-ehpad`) does not have any predecessors, i.e.,
no way of reaching it, we cannot correctly compute the common dominator
of predecessors of `handler`, and end up placing no `block`/`end`
markers. This bug actually sometimes masks the bug 1.
Fix:
When we have an EH pad that does not have any predecessors after this
transformation, deletes all its successors, so that its successors don't
have any dangling predecessors.
---
3. Background:
Actually the `handler` BB in the example shown in bug 2 doesn't need
`end_block` marker, despite it being a new branch destination, because
it already has `end_try` marker which can serve the same purpose. I just
put that example there for an illustration purpose. There is a case we
actually need to place `end_block` marker: when the branch dest is the
appendix BB. The appendix BB is created when there is a call that is
supposed to unwind to the caller ends up unwinding to a wrong EH pad. In
this case we also wrap the call with a nested `try`/`catch`/`end`,
create an 'appendix' BB at the very end of the function, and branch to
that BB, where we rethrow the exception to the caller.
Fix:
When we don't actually need to place block markers, we don't.
---
4. In case we fall through to the continuation BB after the catch block,
after extracting handler code in `fixUnwindMismatches` (refer to bug 2
for an example), we now have to add a branch to it to bypass the
handler.
- Before
```
try
...
(falls through to 'cont')
catch
handler body
end
<-- cont
```
- After
```
try
...
br %cont (new)
catch
end
handler body
<-- cont
```
The problem is, we haven't been placing a new `end_block` marker in the
`cont` BB in this case. We should, and this fixes it. But it is hard to
provide a test case that triggers this bug, because the current
compilation pipeline from .ll to .s does not generate this kind of code;
we always have a `br` after `invoke`. But code without `br` is still
valid, and we can have that kind of code if we have some pipeline
changes or optimizations later. Even mir test cases cannot trigger this
part for now, because we don't encode auxiliary EH-related data
structures (such as `WasmEHFuncInfo`) in mir now. Those functionalities
can be added later, but I don't think we should block this fix on that.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79324
Summary:
As described in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/209. This is
the final reorganization of the SIMD opcode space before
standardization. It has been landed in concert with corresponding
changes in other projects in the WebAssembly SIMD ecosystem.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79224
This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOperand().
I also made a few cleanups in here. For example, to removes use
of getElementType on a pointer when we could just use getFunctionType
from the call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78882
Summary:
Before this patch, `relaxInstruction` takes three arguments, the first
argument refers to the instruction before relaxation and the third
argument is the output instruction after relaxation. There are two quite
strange things:
1) The first argument's type is `const MCInst &`, the third
argument's type is `MCInst &`, but they may be aliased to the same
variable
2) The backends of ARM, AMDGPU, RISC-V, Hexagon assume that the third
argument is a fresh uninitialized `MCInst` even if `relaxInstruction`
may be called like `relaxInstruction(Relaxed, STI, Relaxed)` in a
loop.
In this patch, we drop the thrid argument, and let `relaxInstruction`
directly modify the given instruction. Also, this patch fixes the bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45580, which is introduced by D77851, and
breaks the assumption of ARM, AMDGPU, RISC-V, Hexagon.
Reviewers: Razer6, MaskRay, jyknight, asb, luismarques, enderby, rtaylor, colinl, bcain
Reviewed By: Razer6, MaskRay, bcain
Subscribers: bcain, nickdesaulniers, nathanchance, wuzish, annita.zhang, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, tpr, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78364
Summary:
In CFGStackify, `fixUnwindMismatches` function fixes unwind destination
mismatches created by `try` marker placement. For example,
```
try
...
call @qux ;; This should throw to the caller!
catch
...
end
```
When `call @qux` is supposed to throw to the caller, it is possible that
it is wrapped inside a `catch` so in case it throws it ends up unwinding
there incorrectly. (Also it is possible `call @qux` is supposed to
unwind to another `catch` within the same function.)
To fix this, we wrap this inner `call @qux` with a nested
`try`-`catch`-`end` sequence, and within the nested `catch` body, branch
to the right destination:
```
block $l0
try
...
try ;; new nested try
call @qux
catch ;; new nested catch
local.set n ;; store exnref to a local
br $l0
end
catch
...
end
end
local.get n ;; retrieve exnref back
rethrow ;; rethrow to the caller
```
The previous algorithm placed the nested `try` right before the `call`.
But it is possible that there are stackified instructions before the
call from which the call takes arguments.
```
try
...
i32.const 5
call @qux ;; This should throw to the caller!
catch
...
end
```
In this case we have to place `try` before those stackified
instructions.
```
block $l0
try
...
try ;; this should go *before* 'i32.const 5'
i32.const 5
call @qux
catch
local.set n
br $l0
end
catch
...
end
end
local.get n
rethrow
```
We correctly handle this in the first normal `try` placement phase
(`placeTryMarker` function), but failed to handle this in this
`fixUnwindMismatches`.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77950
Summary:
D74269 added debug info to newly created instructions, including calls
to `malloc` and `free`, by taking debug info from existing instructions
around, whose debug info may or may not be empty.
But there are cases debug info is required by the IR verifier: when both
the caller and the callee functions have DISubprograms, meaning we
already have declarations to `malloc` or `free` with a DISubprogram
attached, newly created calls to `malloc` and `free` should have
non-empty debug info. This patch creates a non-empty dummy debug info in
this case to those calls to make the IR verifier pass.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45461.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: aprantl, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77784
This means the linker will be expect them be undefined at link time an
will generate imports from the `env` module rather than reporting
undefined externals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77192
Summary:
The previous code for determining the innermost region in CFGSort was
not correct. We determine subregion relationship by domination of their
headers, i.e., if region A's header dominates region B's header, B is a
subregion of A. Previously we assumed that if a BB belongs to both a
loop and an exception, the region with fewer number of BBs is the
innermost one. This may not be true, because while WebAssemblyException
contains BBs in all its subregions (loops or exceptions), MachineLoop
may not, because MachineLoop does not contain BBs that don't have a path
to its header even if they are dominated by its header.
Loop header <---|
| |
Exception header |
| \ |
A B |
| \ |
| C |
| |
Loop latch |
| |
-------------|
For example, in this CFG, the loop does not contain B and C, because
they don't have a path back to the loops header. But for CFGSort we
consider the exception here belongs to the loop and the exception should
be a subregion of the loop and scheduled together.
So here we should use `WE->contains(ML->getHeader())` (but not
`ML->contains(WE->getHeader())`, for the stated region above).
This also fixes some comments and deletes `Regions` vector in
`RegionInfo` class, which was not used anywere.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77181
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jfb, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76925
Fix the LowerGlobalDtors pass to run destructors in the same order as the
regular LLVM destructor lowering -- in reverse order. Adjacent
destructors with the same associated object are grouped, but destructors
are not reordered based on associated objects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70685
Having an alloca in a function causes the stack pointer to be generated in the
prolog, but if it's unused other than for debug info, explicit-locals will drop
it and not allocate a local. In this case we need to reset the FrameBaseVreg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76784
Summary:
Swift ABI is based on basic C ABI described here https://github.com/WebAssembly/tool-conventions/blob/master/BasicCABI.md
Swift Calling Convention on WebAssembly is a little deffer from swiftcc
on another architectures.
On non WebAssembly arch, swiftcc accepts extra parameters that are
attributed with swifterror or swiftself by caller. Even if callee
doesn't have these parameters, the invocation succeed ignoring extra
parameters.
But WebAssembly strictly checks that callee and caller signatures are
same. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/Semantics.md#calls
So at WebAssembly level, all swiftcc functions end up extra arguments
and all function definitions and invocations explicitly have additional
parameters to fill swifterror and swiftself.
This patch support signature difference for swiftself and swifterror cc
is swiftcc.
e.g.
```
declare swiftcc void @foo(i32, i32)
@data = global i8* bitcast (void (i32, i32)* @foo to i8*)
define swiftcc void @bar() {
%1 = load i8*, i8** @data
%2 = bitcast i8* %1 to void (i32, i32, i32)*
call swiftcc void %2(i32 1, i32 2, i32 swiftself 3)
ret void
}
```
For swiftcc, emit additional swiftself and swifterror parameters
if there aren't while lowering. These additional parameters are added
for both callee and caller.
They are necessary to match callee and caller signature for direct and
indirect function call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76049
Summary:
These were merged to the SIMD proposal in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/128.
Depends on D76397 to avoid merge conflicts.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76399
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76348
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
Summary:
Using the default DAG.UnrollVectorOp on v16i8 and v8i16 vectors
results in i8 or i16 nodes being inserted into the SelectionDAG. Since
those are illegal types, this causes a legalization assertion failure
for some code patterns, as uncovered by PR45178. This change unrolls
shifts manually to avoid this issue by adding and using a new optional
EVT argument to DAG.ExtractVectorElements to control the type of the
extract_element nodes.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76043
Summary:
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44920
WebAssemblyRegColoring may merge the vreg that currently represents
the FrameBase with one representing an argument.
WebAssemblyExplicitLocals picks up the corresponding local when
a vreg is first added to the Reg2Local mapping, except when it is
an argument instruction which are handled separately.
Note that this does not change that vregs representing the FrameBase
may get merged, it is not clear to me that this may have other
effects we may want to avoid?
Reviewers: dschuff
Reviewed By: dschuff
Subscribers: azakai, sbc100, hiraditya, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits, jgravelle-google
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75718
Summary:
Removes patterns that were not doing useful work, changes the
default extract instructions to be the unsigned versions now that
they are enabled by default, fixes PR44988, and adds tests for
sext_inreg lowering.
Reviewers: aheejin
Reviewed By: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75005
Summary:
We already sorted the blocks when fixing up a set of mutual
loop entries, however, there can be multiple sets of such
mutual loop entries, and the order we encounter them
should not be random, so sort them too.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44982
Patch by Alon Zakai (kripken)
Reviewers: aheejin, sbc100, dschuff
Subscribers: mgrang, sunfish, hiraditya, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74999
Summary:
The instruction at `DefI` can sometimes be destroyed by
`rematerializeCheapDef`, so it should not be used after calling that
function. The fix is to use `Insert` instead when examining additional
multivalue stackifications. `Insert` is the address of the new
defining instruction after all moves and rematerializations have taken
place.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74875
Summary:
Extends the multivalue call infrastructure to tail calls, removes all
legacy calls specialized for particular result types, and removes the
CallIndirectFixup pass, since all indirect call arguments are now
fixed up directly in the post-insertion hook.
In order to keep supporting pretty-printed defs and uses in test
expectations, MCInstLower now inserts an immediate containing the
number of defs for each call and call_indirect. The InstPrinter is
updated to query this immediate if it is present and determine which
MCOperands are defs and uses accordingly.
Depends on D72902.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192
Summary:
There is still room for improvement in the handling of multivalue
nodes in both passes, but the current algorithm is at least correct
and optimizes some simpler cases. In order to make future
optimizations of these passes easier and build confidence that the
current algorithms are correct, this CL also adds a script that
automatically and exhaustively generates interesting multivalue test
cases.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72902
Summary:
Unlike normal calls, call_indirects have immediate arguments that
caused a MachineVerifier failure without a small tweak to loosen the
verifier's requirements for variadicOpsAreDefs instructions.
One nice thing about the new call_indirects is that they do not need
to participate in the PCALL_INDIRECT mechanism because their post-isel
hook handles moving the function pointer argument and adding the flags
and typeindex arguments itself.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74191
Marek Kurdej