The add+and sequence followed by a branch can
happen e.g. when looping over the set bits of an integer:
```
while (x != 0) {
func(x & ~x);
x &= x - 1;
}
```
Reviewed By: ctopper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57296
llvm-svn: 352306
This fixes the patterns that have or/and as a root. 'and' is handled differently since thy usually have a CMP wrapped around them.
I had to look for uses of the CF flag because all these nodes have non-standard CF flag behavior. A real or/xor would always clear CF. In practice we shouldn't be using the CF flag from these nodes as far as I know.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55813
llvm-svn: 349962
The BEXTR instruction documents the SF bit as undefined.
The TBM BEXTR instruction has the same issue, but I'm not sure how to test it. With the control being an immediate we can determine the sign bit is 0 or the BEXTR would have been removed.
Fixes PR40060
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55807
llvm-svn: 349956
The (cmp (and X, Y) 0) pattern is greedy and ends up forming a TESTrr and consuming the and when it might be better to use one of the BMI/TBM like BLSR or BLSI.
This patch moves removes the pattern from isel and adds a post processing check to combine TESTrr+ANDrr into just a TESTrr. With this patch we are able to select the BMI/TBM instructions, but we'll also emit a TESTrr when the result is compared to 0. In many cases the peephole pass will be able to use optimizeCompareInstr to remove the TEST, but its probably not perfect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55870
llvm-svn: 349661
Summary:
This function turns (X >> C1) & C2 into a BMI BEXTR or TBM BEXTRI instruction. For BMI BEXTR we have to materialize an immediate into a register to feed to the BEXTR instruction.
The BMI BEXTR instruction is 2 uops on Intel CPUs. It looks like on SKL its one port 0/6 uop and one port 1/5 uop. Despite what Agner's tables say. I know one of the uops is a regular shift uop so it would have to go through the port 0/6 shifter unit. So that's the same or worse execution wise than the shift+and which is one 0/6 uop and one 0/1/5/6 uop. The move immediate into register is an additional 0/1/5/6 uop.
For now I've limited this transform to AMD CPUs which have a single uop BEXTR. If may also might make sense if we can fold a load or if the and immediate is larger than 32-bits and can't be encoded as a sign extended 32-bit value or if LICM or CSE can hoist the move immediate and share it. But we'd need to look more carefully at that. In the regression I looked at it doesn't look load folding or large immediates were occurring so the regression isn't caused by the loss of those. So we could try to be smarter here if we find a compelling case.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits, andreadb, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52570
llvm-svn: 343399
Enable enableMultipleCopyHints() on X86.
Original Patch by @jonpa:
While enabling the mischeduler for SystemZ, it was discovered that for some reason a test needed one extra seemingly needless COPY (test/CodeGen/SystemZ/call-03.ll). The handling for that is resulted in this patch, which improves the register coalescing by providing not just one copy hint, but a sorted list of copy hints. On SystemZ, this gives ~12500 less register moves on SPEC, as well as marginally less spilling.
Instead of improving just the SystemZ backend, the improvement has been implemented in common-code (calculateSpillWeightAndHint(). This gives a lot of test failures, but since this should be a general improvement I hope that the involved targets will help and review the test updates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128
llvm-svn: 342578
Summary:
In D47428, i propose to choose the `~(-(1 << nbits))` as the canonical form of low-bit-mask formation.
As it is seen from these tests, there is a reason for that.
AArch64 currently better handles `~(-(1 << nbits))`, but not the more traditional `(1 << nbits) - 1` (sic!).
The other way around for X86.
It would be much better to canonicalize.
It would seem that there is too much tests, but this is most of all the auto-generated possible variants
of C code that one would expect for BZHI to be formed, and then manually cleaned up a bit.
So this should be pretty representable, which somewhat good coverage...
Related links:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36419https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37603https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37610https://rise4fun.com/Alive/idM
Reviewers: javed.absar, craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47452
llvm-svn: 334124
Only the bottom 16-bits of BEXTR's control op are required (0:8 INDEX, 15:8 LENGTH).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47690
llvm-svn: 334083
Further refactoring will wait until D47452 has landed.
Part of ongoing work to ensure we test all intrinsic style tests on 32 and 64 bit targets where possible.
llvm-svn: 333841
This reverses instcombine's demanded bits' transform which always tries to clear bits in constants.
As noted in PR35792 and shown in the test diffs:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35792
...we can do better in codegen by trying to form -1. The x86 sub test shows a missed opportunity.
I did investigate changing instcombine's behavior, but it would be more work to change
canonicalization in IR. Clearing bits / shrinking constants can allow killing instructions,
so we'd have to figure out how to not regress those cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42986
llvm-svn: 324839
This allows the immediate to folded into the and instead of being forced to move into a register. This can sometimes result in shorter encodings since the and can sign extend an immediate.
This also allows us to match an and to a movzx after a not.
This can cause an extra move if the input to the separate NOT has an additional user which requires a copy before the NOT.
llvm-svn: 324260
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
Some of the NOREX instructions are used in 32-bit mode making this printing confusing. It also doesn't provide a lot of value since you can see the h-register being used by the instruction.
llvm-svn: 323174
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
Recognizing this pattern during DAG combine hides information about the 'and' and the shift from other combines. I think it should be recognized at isel so its as late as possible. But it can't be done with table based isel because you need to be able to look at both immediates. This patch moves it to custom isel in X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp.
This does break a couple tests in tbm_patterns because we are now emitting an and_flag node or (cmp and, 0) that we dont' recognize yet. We already had this problem for several other TBM patterns so I think this fine and we can address of them together.
I've also fixed a bug where the combine to BEXTR was preventing us from using a trick of zero extending AH to handle extracts of bits 15:8. We might still want to use BEXTR if it enables load folding. But honestly I hope we narrowed the load instead before got to isel.
I think we should probably also support matching BEXTR from (srl/srl (and mask << C), C). But that should be a different patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37592
llvm-svn: 313054
Summary: The 64-bit 'and' with immediate instruction only supports a 32-bit immediate. So for larger constants we have to load the constant into a register first. If the immediate happens to be a mask we can use the BEXTRI instruction to perform the masking. We already do something similar using the BZHI instruction from the BMI2 instruction set.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36129
llvm-svn: 309706
This moves all the bmi2 specific intrinsics to a separate test file and adds a bmi1 only command line to the existing bmi test.
This will allow us to see the missed opportunity to use bextr to handle 64-bit 'and' with a large mask. This will be improved in an upcoming patch.
llvm-svn: 309700
This patch adds more patterns that a reasonable person might write that can be compiled to BZHI.
This adds support for
(~0U >> (32 - b)) & a;
and
a << (32 - b) >> (32 - b);
This was inspired by the code in APInt::clearUnusedBits.
This can pass an index of 32 to the bzhi instruction which a quick test of Haswell hardware shows will not mask any bits. Though the description text in the Intel manual says the "index is saturated to OperandSize-1". The pseudocode in the same manual indicates no bits will be zeroed for this case.
I think this is still missing cases where the subtract portion is an 8-bit operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32616
llvm-svn: 302549
An identity COPY like this:
%AL = COPY %AL, %EAX<imp-def>
has no semantic effect, but encodes liveness information: Further users
of %EAX only depend on this instruction even though it does not define
the full register.
Replace the COPY with a KILL instruction in those cases to maintain this
liveness information. (This reverts a small part of r238588 but this
time adds a comment explaining why a KILL instruction is useful).
llvm-svn: 274952
xorl + setcc is generally the preferred sequence due to the partial register
stall setcc + movzbl suffers from. As a bonus, it also encodes one byte smaller.
This fixes PR28146.
The original commit tried inserting an 8bit-subreg into a GR32 (not GR32_ABCD)
which was not appreciated by fast regalloc on 32-bit.
llvm-svn: 274802
xorl + setcc is generally the preferred sequence due to the partial register
stall setcc + movzbl suffers from. As a bonus, it also encodes one byte smaller.
This fixes PR28146.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21774
llvm-svn: 274692
Previously the patterns didn't have high enough priority and we would only use the GR32 form if the only the upper 32 or 56 bits were zero.
Fixes PR23100.
llvm-svn: 234075
These BEXTR cases are a check for the 64-bit load form and two negative cases where the bitrange is non-contiguous. From a private patch equivalent to r189742/PR17028.
llvm-svn: 232580
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
Gabor Buella