Summary:
Four things here:
1. Generalize the fold to handle non-splat divisors. Reasonably trivial.
2. Unban power-of-two divisors. I don't see any reason why they should
be illegal.
* There is no ban in Hacker's Delight
* I think the ban came from the same bug that caused the miscompile
in the base patch - in `floor((2^W - 1) / D)` we were dividing by
`D0` instead of `D`, and we **were** ensuring that `D0` is not `1`,
which made sense.
3. Unban `1` divisors. I no longer believe Hacker's Delight actually says
that the fold is invalid for `D = 0`. Further considerations:
* We know that
* `(X u% 1) == 0` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `(X u% 1) != 0` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* Also, we know that
* `X u<= -1` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `X u> -1` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* https://godbolt.org/z/7jnZJXhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/oF6p
* We know will end up with the following:
`(setule/setugt (rotr (mul N, P), K), Q)`
* Therefore, for given new DAG nodes and comparison predicates
(`ule`/`ugt`), we will still produce the correct answer if:
`Q` is a all-ones constant; and both `P` and `K` are *anything*
other than `undef`.
* The fold will indeed produce `Q = all-ones`.
4. Try to re-splat the `P` and `K` vectors - we don't care about
their values for the lanes where divisor was `1`.
Reviewers: RKSimon, hermord, craig.topper, spatel, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63963
llvm-svn: 366637
As detailed on PR42674, we can reduce a vXi8 down until we have the final <8 x i8>, and then use PSADBW with zero, to sum those values. We then extract the bottom i8, discarding any overflow from the upper bits of the i16 result.
llvm-svn: 366636
If the blockaddress is not destoryed, the destination block will still
be marked as having its address taken, limiting further transformations.
I think there are other places where the dead blockaddress constants are kept
around, I'll look into that as follow up.
Reviewers: craig.topper, brzycki, davide
Reviewed By: brzycki, davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64936
llvm-svn: 366633
Summary: Make debugserver a tool like lldb-server, so it can be included/excluded via `LLDB_TOOL_DEBUGSERVER_BUILD`. This replaces the old `LLDB_NO_DEBUGSERVER` flag. Doing the same for darwin-debug while I am here.
Reviewers: xiaobai, JDevlieghere, davide
Reviewed By: xiaobai, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64994
llvm-svn: 366631
Sometimes, you can end up with cross-bank copies between same-sized GPRs and
FPRs, which feed into G_STOREs. When these copies feed only into stores, they
aren't necessary; we can just store using the original register bank.
This provides some minor code size savings for some floating point SPEC
benchmarks. (Around 0.2% for 453.povray and 450.soplex)
This issue doesn't seem to show up due to regbankselect or anything similar. So,
this patch introduces an early select function, `contractCrossBankCopyIntoStore`
which performs the contraction when possible. The selector then continues
normally and selects the correct store opcode, eliminating needless copies
along the way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65024
llvm-svn: 366625
Summary:
Add immutable WASM global `__tls_align` which stores the alignment
requirements of the TLS segment.
Add `__builtin_wasm_tls_align()` intrinsic to get this alignment in Clang.
The expected usage has now changed to:
__wasm_init_tls(memalign(__builtin_wasm_tls_align(),
__builtin_wasm_tls_size()));
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin, sbc100, sunfish, alexcrichton
Reviewed By: tlively
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65028
llvm-svn: 366624
Summary:
Regular LTO modules do not need LTO Unit splitting, only ThinLTO does
(they must be consistently split into regular and Thin units for
optimizations such as whole program devirtualization and lower type
tests). In order to avoid spurious errors from LTO when combining with
split ThinLTO modules, always set this flag for regular LTO modules.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65009
llvm-svn: 366623
There were two main problems:
* The 'nativecodegen' pseudo-component was unconditionally adding
${native_tgt}CodeGen even though it conditionally added ${native_tgt}Info and
${native_tgt}Desc. This has been fixed by making ${native_tgt}CodeGen
conditional too
* The 'all' pseudo-component was causing library names like LLVMLLVMDemangle as
the expansion was to a library name and not a component. There doesn't seem to
be a list of available components anywhere so this has been fixed by moving the
expansion of 'all' back where it was before. This manifested in different ways
on different builders but it was the same root cause
llvm-svn: 366622
Some targets are missing LLVMDemangle, one is adding the LLVM prefix twice, and two
are hitting the very error this patch fixes for my target. Reverting while I work
through the reports.
llvm-svn: 366615
I believe this to have been a latent bug as the same expansion checks for the
existence of ${native_tgt}Info and ${native_tgt}Desc and only adds them if
they were compiled but unconditionally adds ${native_tgt}CodeGen.
This should fix llvm-clang-x86_64-win-fast which builds ARM only on an X86 host and similar builders.
llvm-svn: 366612
Summary:
If you use pseudo-targets like AllTargetsCodeGens in LLVM_DYLIB_COMPONENTS
then a test will fail because `./bin/llvm-config --shared-mode` can't
handle these targets. We can fix this by expanding them before embedding
the string into llvm-config
Reviewers: bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65011
llvm-svn: 366610
Some minor versions of AppleClang 9 appear not to fail the test. It's
such a mess that the only sane thing to do is to mark the test as
UNSUPPORTED.
llvm-svn: 366606
The top-level BUNDLE instruction should behave as an ordinary
instruction. It is supposed to have all relevant registers as implicit
operands. Moving it should work as any other instruction. I believe
the assert intended to avoid moving instructions inside bundles.
llvm-svn: 366605
This reverts r366593, which caused unforeseen breakage on the build bots.
I'm reverting until the problems have been figured out and fixed.
llvm-svn: 366603
This change reverts most of the previous register name generation.
The real problem is that RegisterTuple does not generate asm names.
Added optional operand to RegisterTuple. This way we can simplify
register name access and dramatically reduce the size of static
tables for the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64967
llvm-svn: 366598
Summary:
This commit allows specifying LIBCXX_ENABLE_PARALLEL_ALGORITHMS when
configuring libc++ in CMake. When that option is enabled, libc++ will
assume that the PSTL can be found somewhere on the CMake module path,
and it will provide the C++17 parallel algorithms based on the PSTL
(that is assumed to be available).
The commit also adds support for running the PSTL tests as part of
the libc++ test suite.
Reviewers: rodgert, EricWF
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits, mclow.lists, EricWF
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60480
llvm-svn: 366593
Summary: lldb-mi has been removed, but there are still a bunch of references in the code base. This patch removes all of them.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jfb
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, ki.stfu, mgorny, abidh, jfb, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64992
llvm-svn: 366590
Summary:
The function Unwind-EHABI.cpp:_Unwind_VRS_Pop loads the saved values of
64-bit FP registers as two 32-bit words because they might not be
8-byte aligned. Combining these words into a 64-bit value has to be
done differently on big-endian platforms.
Reviewers: ostannard, john.brawn, dmgreen
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, christof, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64996
llvm-svn: 366587
Roman Lebedev