Introduced/discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D38719
The header validation logic was also explicitly building the DWARFUnits
to validate. But then other calls, like "Units.getUnitForOffset" creates
the DWARFUnits again in the DWARFContext proper - so, let's avoid
creating the DWARFUnits twice by walking the DWARFContext's units rather
than building a new list explicitly.
This does reduce some verifier power - it means that any unit with a
header parsing failure won't get further validation, whereas the
verifier-created units were getting some further validation despite
invalid headers. I don't think this is a great loss/seems "right" in
some ways to me that if the header's invalid we should stop there.
Exposing the raw DWARFUnitVectors from DWARFContext feels a bit
sub-optimal, but gave simple access to the getUnitForOffset to keep the
rest of the code fairly similar.
In 1fa27f2a10, we made <filesystem>'s iterator types model concepts
from <ranges>, but we forgot to add the appropriate availability
annotations. This broke back-deployment to platforms that don't have
<filesystem> for which we have availability annotations.
For some reason, this wasn't caught by our back-deployment CI.
I believe this is due to the fact that we use a slightly older
compiler in the CI, and perhaps that compiler does not honour
our `#pragma clang attribute push` properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114456
This canonicalization breaks the ability to discard checks in some cases.
Add a command line option to disable it. This option is on by default,
so the change is NFC.
See for details:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112895#3149487
Compiler has an analysis for perfect diamond matching but it does not
support nodes with main/alternate opcodes. The problem is that the
scalars themselves are different and might not match directly with other
nodes, but operands and main/alternate opcodes might match and compiler
might reuse some previously emitted vector instructions. Need to include
this analysis in the cost model and actual vector instructions emission
process.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114101
The 14.31.30818 toolset has the following in the `stdatomic.h`:
~~~
#ifndef __cplusplus
#error <stdatomic.h> is not yet supported when compiling as C, but this is planned for a future release.
#endif
~~~
This results in clang failing to build existing code which relied on
`stdatomic.h` in C mode on Windows. Simply fallback to the clang header
until that header is available as a complete implementation.
Building cfi with recent clang on a 64-bit system results in the
following warnings:
compiler-rt/lib/cfi/cfi.cpp:233:64: warning: format specifies type 'void *' but the argument has type '__sanitizer::uptr' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Wformat]
VReport(1, "Can not handle: symtab > strtab (%p > %zx)\n", symtab, strtab);
~~ ^~~~~~
%lu
compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:231:46: note: expanded from macro 'VReport'
if ((uptr)Verbosity() >= (level)) Report(__VA_ARGS__); \
^~~~~~~~~~~
compiler-rt/lib/cfi/cfi.cpp:253:59: warning: format specifies type 'void *' but the argument has type '__sanitizer::uptr' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Wformat]
VReport(1, "Can not handle: symtab %p, strtab %zx\n", symtab, strtab);
~~ ^~~~~~
%lu
compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:231:46: note: expanded from macro 'VReport'
if ((uptr)Verbosity() >= (level)) Report(__VA_ARGS__); \
^~~~~~~~~~~
Since `__sanitizer::uptr` has the same size as `size_t`, consistently
use `%z` as a printf specifier.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114466
Almost all of the time, call instructions don't actually lead to SP being
different after they return. An exception is win32's _chkstk, which which
implements stack probes. We need to recognise that as modifying SP, so
that copies of the value are tracked as distinct vla pointers.
This patch adds a target frame-lowering hook to see whether stack probe
functions will modify the stack pointer, store that in an internal flag,
and if it's true then scan CALL instructions to see whether they're a
stack probe. If they are, recognise them as defining a new stack-pointer
value.
The added test exercises this behaviour: two calls to _chkstk should be
considered as producing two different values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114443
The padding tests previously contained the tile loops. This revision removes the tile loops since padding itself does not consider the loops. Instead the induction variables are passed in as function arguments which promotes them to symbols in the affine expressions. Note that the pad-and-hoist.mlir test still exercises padding in the context of the full loop nest.
Depends On D114175
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114227
Add the makeComposedPadHighOp method which creates a new PadTensorOp if necessary. If the source to pad is actually the result of a sequence of padded LinalgOps, the method checks if padding is needed or if we can use the padded result of the padded LinalgOp sequence directly.
Example:
```
%0 = tensor.extract_slice %arg0 [%iv0, %iv1] [%sz0, %sz1]
%1 = linalg.pad_tensor %0 low[0, 0] high[...] { linalg.yield %cst }
%2 = linalg.matmul ins(...) outs(%1)
%3 = tensor.extract_slice %2 [0, 0] [%sz0, %sz1]
```
when padding %3 return %2 instead of introducing
```
%4 = linalg.pad_tensor %3 low[0, 0] high[...] { linalg.yield %cst }
```
Depends On D114161
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache, pifon2a
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114175
Change the failure condition of padOperandToSmallestStaticBoundingBox to never fail if the operand is already statically sized.
In particular:
- if the padding value computation fails -> return failure if the operand shape is dynamic and success if it is static.
- if there is no extract slice op -> return failure if the operand shape is dynamic and success if it is static.
The latter change prevents padding from failure if the output operand passed by iteration argument is statically sized since in this case the extract / insert slice pairs are removed by canonicalization.
Depends On D114153
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114161
The clang portion of c933c2eb33 was missed as I made
some kind of mistake squashing the commits with git.
This patch just adds those.
The original review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114088
The alloc dealloc pair generation callback is really central to the
bufferization algorithm, it modifies the state in a way that affects
correctness. This is not really a configurable option. Moving it to
BufferizationState removes what was probably the reason it was added
as a callback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114417
The PCH reader looks for `__clangast` section in the precompiled module file, which is not present in the file on AIX, and we don't support writing this custom section in XCOFF yet.
Reviewed By: daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114481
Avoid un-necessarily recreating DBG_VALUEs on call instructions.
In LiveDebugvalues we choose to ignore any clobbers of SP by call
instructions, as they're irrelevant to our model of the machine. We
currently do so for tracking register values (MTracker); do the same for
tracking variable locations (TTracker).
Test modified to endure that a duplicate DBG_VALUE is not created after the
call in struction in this test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114365
Enabling instruction referencing causes a few variable locations to switch
order -- i.e., they switch position in the output DWARF, or sometimes the
order of DBG_VALUEs. Update a few tests to reflect this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114261
The AST structural equivalence check did not differentiate between
a struct and a struct with same name in different namespace. When
type of a member is checked it is possible to encounter such a case
and wrongly decide that the types are similar. This problem is fixed
by check for the namespaces of a record declaration.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113118
Right now if the LLDB is compiled under the windows with static vcruntime library, the -o and -k commands will not work.
The problem is that the LLDB create FILE* in lldb.exe and pass it to liblldb.dll which is an object from CRT.
Since the CRT is statically linked each of these module has its own copy of the CRT with it's own global state and the LLDB should not share CRT objects between them.
In this change I moved the logic of creating FILE* out of commands stream from Driver class to SBDebugger.
To do this I added new method: SBError SBDebugger::SetInputStream(SBStream &stream)
Command to build the LLDB:
cmake -G Ninja -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;lldb;libcxx" -DLLVM_USE_CRT_RELEASE="MT" -DLLVM_USE_CRT_MINSIZEREL="MT" -DLLVM_USE_CRT_RELWITHDEBINFO="MT" -DP
YTHON_HOME:FILEPATH=C:/Python38 -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER:STRING=cl.exe -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER:STRING=cl.exe ../llvm
Command which will fail:
lldb.exe -o help
See discord discussion for more details: https://discord.com/channels/636084430946959380/636732809708306432/854629125398724628
This revision is for the further discussion.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104413
Now that we lock the internal allocator around fork,
it's possible it will create additional deadlocks.
Add a fake mutex that substitutes the internal allocator
for the purposes of deadlock detection.
Depends on D114531.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114532
There is a small chance that the internal allocator is locked
during fork and then the new process is created with locked
internal allocator and any attempts to use it will deadlock.
For example, if detected a suppressed race in the parent during fork
and then another suppressed race after the fork.
This becomes much more likely with the new tsan runtime
as it uses the internal allocator for more things.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114531
The supplied test case, reduced from real world code, crashes with a
'Invalid size request on a scalable vector.' error.
Since it's similar in spirit to an existing LAA test, rename the file to
generalize it to both.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114155
[NFC] As part of using inclusive language within the llvm project, this patch
renames the master label in `x86-shrink-wrapping.ll` to main.
Reviewed By: ZarkoCA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113940
I believe, this effectively completes `X86TTIImpl::getReplicationShuffleCost()`
for AVX512, other than the question of handling plain AVX512F,
where we end up with some really ugly "shuffles",
but then is there any CPU's that support AVX512, but not AVX512DQ/AVX512BW?
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114315
(~a & b) ^ (a | b) --> a
This is the swapped and/or (Demorgan?) sibling fold for
the fold added with D114462 ( 892648b18a ).
This case is easier to specify because we are returning
a root value, not a 'not':
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/SRzj4f
With link-time optimizations enabled, resulting DWARF mayend up containing
cross CU references (through the DW_AT_abstract_origin attribute).
Consider the following example:
// sum.c
__attribute__((always_inline)) int sum(int a, int b)
{
return a + b;
}
// main.c
extern int sum(int, int);
int main()
{
int a = 5, b = 10, c = sum(a, b);
return 0;
}
Compiled as follows:
$ clang -g -flto -fuse-ld=lld main.c sum.c -o main
Results in the following DWARF:
-- sum.c CU: abstract instance tree
...
0x000000b0: DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_name ("sum")
DW_AT_decl_file ("sum.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (1)
DW_AT_prototyped (true)
DW_AT_type (0x000000d3 "int")
DW_AT_external (true)
DW_AT_inline (DW_INL_inlined)
0x000000bc: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_name ("a")
DW_AT_decl_file ("sum.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (1)
DW_AT_type (0x000000d3 "int")
0x000000c7: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_name ("b")
DW_AT_decl_file ("sum.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (1)
DW_AT_type (0x000000d3 "int")
...
-- main.c CU: concrete inlined instance tree
...
0x0000006d: DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine
DW_AT_abstract_origin (0x00000000000000b0 "sum")
DW_AT_low_pc (0x00000000002016ef)
DW_AT_high_pc (0x00000000002016f1)
DW_AT_call_file ("main.c")
DW_AT_call_line (5)
DW_AT_call_column (0x19)
0x00000081: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_location (DW_OP_reg0 RAX)
DW_AT_abstract_origin (0x00000000000000bc "a")
0x00000088: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_location (DW_OP_reg2 RCX)
DW_AT_abstract_origin (0x00000000000000c7 "b")
...
Note that each entry within the concrete inlined instance tree in
the main.c CU has a DW_AT_abstract_origin attribute which
refers to a corresponding entry within the abstract instance
tree in the sum.c CU.
llvm-dwarfdump --statistics did not properly report
DW_TAG_formal_parameters/DW_TAG_variables from concrete inlined
instance trees which had 0% location coverage and which
referred to a different CU, mainly because information about abstract
instance trees and their parameters/variables was stored
locally - just for the currently processed CU,
rather than globally - for all CUs.
In particular, if the concrete inlined instance tree from
the example above was to look like this
(i.e. parameter b has 0% location coverage, hence why it's missing):
0x0000006d: DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine
DW_AT_abstract_origin (0x00000000000000b0 "sum")
DW_AT_low_pc (0x00000000002016ef)
DW_AT_high_pc (0x00000000002016f1)
DW_AT_call_file ("main.c")
DW_AT_call_line (5)
DW_AT_call_column (0x19)
0x00000081: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_location (DW_OP_reg0 RAX)
DW_AT_abstract_origin (0x00000000000000bc "a")
llvm-dwarfdump --statistics would have not reported b as such.
Patch by Dimitrije Milosevic.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113465
David Blaikie