pack expansions, e.g. given
template<typename... Types> struct tuple;
template<typename... Types>
struct tuple_of_refs {
typedef tuple<Types&...> types;
};
the type of the "types" typedef is a PackExpansionType whose pattern
is Types&.
This commit introduces support for creating pack expansions for
template type arguments, as above, but not for any other kind of pack
expansion, nor for any form of instantiation.
llvm-svn: 122223
themselves have no template parameters. This is actually a restriction
due to the grammar of template template parameters, but we choose to
diagnose it in Sema to provide better recovery.
llvm-svn: 117032
One who seeks the Tao unlearns something new every day.
Less and less remains until you arrive at non-action.
When you arrive at non-action,
nothing will be left undone.
llvm-svn: 112244
- move DeclSpec &c into the Sema library
- move ParseAST into the Parse library
Reflect this change in a thousand different includes.
Reflect this change in the link orders.
llvm-svn: 111667
a function prototype is followed by a declarator if we
aren't parsing a K&R style identifier list.
Also, avoid skipping randomly after a declaration if a
semicolon is missing. Before we'd get:
t.c:3:1: error: expected function body after function declarator
void bar();
^
Now we get:
t.c:1:11: error: invalid token after top level declarator
void foo()
^
;
llvm-svn: 108105
allows Sema some limited access to the current scope, which we only
use in one way: when Sema is performing some kind of declaration that
is not directly driven by the parser (e.g., due to template
instantiatio or lazy declaration of a member), we can find the Scope
associated with a DeclContext, if that DeclContext is still in the
process of being parsed.
Use this to make the implicit declaration of special member functions
in a C++ class more "scope-less", rather than using the NULL Scope hack.
llvm-svn: 107491
parameters starts at the end of the template-parameter rather than at
the point where the template parameter name is encounted. For example,
given:
typedef unsigned char T;
template<typename T = T> struct X0 { };
The "T" in the default argument refers to the typedef of "unsigned
char", rather than referring to the newly-introduced template type
parameter 'T'.
Addresses <rdar://problem/8122812>.
llvm-svn: 107354
(or operator-function-id) as a template, but the context is actually
non-dependent or the current instantiation, allow us to use knowledge
of what kind of template it is, e.g., type template vs. function
template, for further syntactic disambiguation. This allows us to
parse properly in the presence of stray "template" keywords, which is
necessary in C++0x and it's good recovery in C++98/03.
llvm-svn: 106167
disambiguation keywords outside of templates in C++98/03. Previously,
the warning would fire when the associated nested-name-specifier was
not dependent, but that was a misreading of the C++98/03 standard:
now, we complain only when we're outside of any template.
llvm-svn: 106161
the required "template" keyword, using the same heuristics we do for
dependent template names in member access expressions, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:11:8: error: use 'template'
keyword to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
T::getAs<U>();
^
template
Fixes PR5404.
llvm-svn: 104409
that is missing the 'template' keyword, e.g.,
t->getAs<T>()
where getAs is a member of an unknown specialization. C++ requires
that we treat "getAs" as a value, but that would fail to parse since T
is the name of a type. We would then fail at the '>', since a type
cannot be followed by a '>'.
This is a very common error for C++ programmers to make, especially
since GCC occasionally allows it when it shouldn't (as does Visual
C++). So, when we are in this case, we use tentative parsing to see if
the tokens starting at "<" can only be parsed as a template argument
list. If so, we produce a diagnostic with a fix-it that states that
the 'template' keyword is needed:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:5:8: error: 'template' keyword
is required to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
t->getAs<T>();
^
template
This is just a start of this patch; I'd like to apply the same
approach to everywhere that a template-id with dependent template name
can be parsed.
llvm-svn: 104406
that name constructors, the endless joys of out-of-line constructor
definitions, and various other corner cases that the previous hack
never imagined. Fixes PR5688 and tightens up semantic analysis for
constructor names.
Additionally, fixed a problem where we wouldn't properly enter the
declarator scope of a parenthesized declarator. We were entering the
scope, then leaving it when we saw the ")"; now, we re-enter the
declarator scope before parsing the parameter list.
Note that we are forced to perform some tentative parsing within a
class (call it C) to tell the difference between
C(int); // constructor
and
C (f)(int); // member function
which is rather unfortunate. And, although it isn't necessary for
correctness, we use the same tentative-parsing mechanism for
out-of-line constructors to improve diagnostics in icky cases like:
C::C C::f(int); // error: C::C refers to the constructor name, but
// we complain nicely and recover by treating it as
// a type.
llvm-svn: 93322
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
llvm-svn: 89543
annotation token, because some of the tokens we're annotating might
not be in the set of cached tokens (we could have consumed them
unconditionally).
Also, move the tentative parsing from ParseTemplateTemplateArgument
into the one caller that needs it, improving recovery.
llvm-svn: 86904
parameters. Rather than storing them as either declarations (for the
non-dependent case) or expressions (for the dependent case), we now
(always) store them as TemplateNames.
The primary change here is to add a new kind of TemplateArgument,
which stores a TemplateName. However, making that change ripples to
every switch on a TemplateArgument's kind, also affecting
TemplateArgumentLocInfo/TemplateArgumentLoc, default template
arguments for template template parameters, type-checking of template
template arguments, etc.
This change is light on testing. It should fix several pre-existing
problems with template template parameters, such as:
- the inability to use dependent template names as template template
arguments
- template template parameter default arguments cannot be
instantiation
However, there are enough pieces missing that more implementation is
required before we can adequately test template template parameters.
llvm-svn: 86777
handling template template parameters properly. This refactoring:
- Parses template template arguments as id-expressions, representing
the result of the parse as a template name (Action::TemplateTy)
rather than as an expression (lame!).
- Represents all parsed template arguments via a new parser-specific
type, ParsedTemplateArgument, which stores the kind of template
argument (type, non-type, template) along with all of the source
information about the template argument. This replaces an ad hoc
set of 3 vectors (one for a void*, which was either a type or an
expression; one for a bit telling whether the first was a type or
an expression; and one for a single source location pointing at
the template argument).
- Moves TemplateIdAnnotation into the new Parse/Template.h. It never
belonged in the Basic library anyway.
llvm-svn: 86708
appears in a deprecated context. In the new strategy, we emit the warnings
as usual unless we're currently parsing a declaration, where "declaration" is
restricted to mean a decl group or a few special cases in Objective C. If
we *are* parsing a declaration, we queue up the deprecation warnings until
the declaration has been completely parsed, and then emit them only if the
decl is not deprecated.
We also standardize the bookkeeping for deprecation so as to avoid special cases.
llvm-svn: 85998
member templates declared inside other templates. This allows us to
match out-of-line definitions of member function templates within
class templates to the declarations within the class template. We
still can't handle out-of-line definitions for member class templates,
however.
llvm-svn: 79955
templates, e.g.,
template<typename T>
struct Outer {
struct Inner;
};
template<typename T>
struct Outer<T>::Inner {
// ...
};
Implementing this feature required some extensions to ActOnTag, which
now takes a set of template parameter lists, and is the precursor to
removing the ActOnClassTemplate function from the parser Action
interface. The reason for this approach is simple: the parser cannot
tell the difference between a class template definition and the
definition of a member of a class template; both have template
parameter lists, and semantic analysis determines what that template
parameter list means.
There is still some cleanup to do with ActOnTag and
ActOnClassTemplate. This commit provides the basic functionality we
need, however.
llvm-svn: 76820
compilation, and (hopefully) introduce RAII objects for changing the
"potentially evaluated" state at all of the necessary places within
Sema and Parser. Other changes:
- Set the unevaluated/potentially-evaluated context appropriately
during template instantiation.
- We now recognize three different states while parsing or
instantiating expressions: unevaluated, potentially evaluated, and
potentially potentially evaluated (for C++'s typeid).
- When we're in a potentially potentially-evaluated context, queue
up MarkDeclarationReferenced calls in a stack. For C++ typeid
expressions that are potentially evaluated, we will play back
these MarkDeclarationReferenced calls when we exit the
corresponding potentially potentially-evaluated context.
- Non-type template arguments are now parsed as constant
expressions, so they are not potentially-evaluated.
llvm-svn: 73899
redundant functionality. The result (ASTOwningVector) lives in
clang/Parse/Ownership.h and is used by both the parser and semantic
analysis. No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 72214
template class X<int>;
This also cleans up the propagation of template information through
declaration parsing, which is used to improve some diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 71608
parse just a single declaration and provide a reasonable diagnostic
when the "only one declarator per template declaration" rule is
violated. This eliminates some ugly, ugly hackery where we used to
require thatn the layout of a DeclGroup of a single element be the
same as the layout of a single declaration.
llvm-svn: 71596
of the range is now the ';' location. For something like this:
$ cat t2.c
#define bool int
void f(int x, int y) {
bool b = !x && y;
}
We used to produce:
$ clang-cc t2.c -ast-dump
typedef char *__builtin_va_list;
void f(int x, int y)
(CompoundStmt 0x2201f10 <t2.c:3:22, line:5:1>
(DeclStmt 0x2201ef0 <line:2:14> <----
0x2201a20 "int b =
(BinaryOperator 0x2201ed0 <line:4:10, col:16> 'int' '&&'
(UnaryOperator 0x2201e90 <col:10, col:11> 'int' prefix '!'
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201c90 <col:11> 'int' ParmVar='x' 0x2201a50))
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201eb0 <col:16> 'int' ParmVar='y' 0x2201e10))")
Now we produce:
$ clang-cc t2.c -ast-dump
typedef char *__builtin_va_list;
void f(int x, int y)
(CompoundStmt 0x2201f10 <t2.c:3:22, line:5:1>
(DeclStmt 0x2201ef0 <line:2:14, line:4:17> <------
0x2201a20 "int b =
(BinaryOperator 0x2201ed0 <col:10, col:16> 'int' '&&'
(UnaryOperator 0x2201e90 <col:10, col:11> 'int' prefix '!'
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201c90 <col:11> 'int' ParmVar='x' 0x2201a50))
(DeclRefExpr 0x2201eb0 <col:16> 'int' ParmVar='y' 0x2201e10))")
llvm-svn: 68288
failures that involve malformed types, e.g., "typename X::foo" where
"foo" isn't a type, or "std::vector<void>" that doens't instantiate
properly.
Similarly, be a bit smarter in our handling of ambiguities that occur
in Sema::getTypeName, to eliminate duplicate error messages about
ambiguous name lookup.
This eliminates two XFAILs in test/SemaCXX, one of which was crying
out to us, trying to tell us that we were producing repeated error
messages.
llvm-svn: 68251
within nested-name-specifiers, e.g., for the "apply" in
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>::type
At present, we can't instantiate these nested-name-specifiers, so our
testing is sketchy.
llvm-svn: 68081
representation handles the various ways in which one can name a
template, including unqualified references ("vector"), qualified
references ("std::vector"), and dependent template names
("MetaFun::template apply").
One immediate effect of this change is that the representation of
nested-name-specifiers in type names for class template
specializations (e.g., std::vector<int>) is more accurate. Rather than
representing std::vector<int> as
std::(vector<int>)
we represent it as
(std::vector)<int>
which more closely follows the C++ grammar.
Additionally, templates are no longer represented as declarations
(DeclPtrTy) in Parse-Sema interactions. Instead, I've introduced a new
OpaquePtr type (TemplateTy) that holds the representation of a
TemplateName. This will simplify the handling of dependent
template-names, once we get there.
llvm-svn: 68074
productions (except the already broken ObjC cases like @class X,Y;) in
the parser that can produce more than one Decl return a DeclGroup instead
of a Decl, etc.
This allows elimination of the Decl::NextDeclarator field, and exposes
various clients that should look at all decls in a group, but which were
only looking at one (such as the dumper, printer, etc). These have been
fixed.
Still TODO:
1) there are some FIXME's in the code about potentially using
DeclGroup for better location info.
2) ParseObjCAtDirectives should return a DeclGroup due to @class etc.
3) I'm not sure what is going on with StmtIterator.cpp, or if it can
be radically simplified now.
4) I put a truly horrible hack in ParseTemplate.cpp.
I plan to bring up #3/4 on the mailing list, but don't plan to tackle
#1/2 in the short term.
llvm-svn: 68002
pointer. Its purpose in life is to be a glorified void*, but which does not
implicitly convert to void* or other OpaquePtr's with a different UID.
Introduce Action::DeclPtrTy which is a typedef for OpaquePtr<0>. Change the
entire parser/sema interface to use DeclPtrTy instead of DeclTy*. This
makes the C++ compiler enforce that these aren't convertible to other opaque
types.
We should also convert ExprTy, StmtTy, TypeTy, AttrTy, BaseTy, etc,
but I don't plan to do that in the short term.
The one outstanding known problem with this patch is that we lose the
bitmangling optimization where ActionResult<DeclPtrTy> doesn't know how to
bitmangle the success bit into the low bit of DeclPtrTy. I will rectify
this with a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 67952
know how to recover from an error, we can attach a hint to the
diagnostic that states how to modify the code, which can be one of:
- Insert some new code (a text string) at a particular source
location
- Remove the code within a given range
- Replace the code within a given range with some new code (a text
string)
Right now, we use these hints to annotate diagnostic information. For
example, if one uses the '>>' in a template argument in C++98, as in
this code:
template<int I> class B { };
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
we'll warn that the behavior will change in C++0x. The fix is to
insert parenthese, so we use code insertion annotations to illustrate
where the parentheses go:
test.cpp:10:10: warning: use of right-shift operator ('>>') in template
argument will require parentheses in C++0x
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
^
( )
Use of these annotations is partially implemented for HTML
diagnostics, but it's not (yet) producing valid HTML, which may be
related to PR2386, so it has been #if 0'd out.
In this future, we could consider hooking this mechanism up to the
rewriter to actually try to fix these problems during compilation (or,
after a compilation whose only errors have fixes). For now, however, I
suggest that we use these code modification hints whenever we can, so
that we get better diagnostics now and will have better coverage when
we find better ways to use this information.
This also fixes PR3410 by placing the complaint about missing tokens
just after the previous token (rather than at the location of the next
token).
llvm-svn: 65570
vector<vector<double>> Matrix;
In C++98/03, this token always means "right shift". However, if we're in
a context where we know that it can't mean "right shift", provide a
friendly reminder to put a space between the two >'s and then treat it
as two >'s as part of recovery.
In C++0x, this token is always broken into two '>' tokens.
llvm-svn: 65484
std::vector<int>::allocator_type
When we parse a template-id that names a type, it will become either a
template-id annotation (which is a parsed representation of a
template-id that has not yet been through semantic analysis) or a
typename annotation (where semantic analysis has resolved the
template-id to an actual type), depending on the context. We only
produce a type in contexts where we know that we only need type
information, e.g., in a type specifier. Otherwise, we create a
template-id annotation that can later be "upgraded" by transforming it
into a typename annotation when the parser needs a type. This occurs,
for example, when we've parsed "std::vector<int>" above and then see
the '::' after it. However, it means that when writing something like
this:
template<> class Outer::Inner<int> { ... };
We have two tokens to represent Outer::Inner<int>: one token for the
nested name specifier Outer::, and one template-id annotation token
for Inner<int>, which will be passed to semantic analysis to define
the class template specialization.
Most of the churn in the template tests in this patch come from an
improvement in our error recovery from ill-formed template-ids.
llvm-svn: 65467
us whether there was an error in trying to parse a type-name (type-id
in C++). This allows propagation of errors further in the compiler,
suppressing more bogus error messages.
llvm-svn: 64922
specialization of class templates, e.g.,
template<typename T> class X;
template<> class X<int> { /* blah */ };
Each specialization is a different *Decl node (naturally), and can
have different members. We keep track of forward declarations and
definitions as for other class/struct/union types.
This is only the basic framework: we still have to deal with checking
the template headers properly, improving recovery when there are
failures, handling nested name specifiers, etc.
llvm-svn: 64848
arguments. This commit covers checking and merging default template
arguments from previous declarations, but it does not cover the actual
use of default template arguments when naming class template
specializations.
llvm-svn: 64229
disambiguation contexts, so that we properly parse template arguments
such as
A<int()>
as type-ids rather than as expressions. Since this can be confusing
(especially when the template parameter is a non-type template
parameter), we try to give a friendly error message.
Almost, eliminate a redundant error message (that should have been a
note) and add some ultra-basic checks for non-type template
arguments.
llvm-svn: 64189
representation for template arguments. Also simplifies the interface
for ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization and eliminates some annoying
allocations of TemplateArgs.
My attempt at smart pointers for template arguments lists is
relatively lame. We can improve it once we're sure that we have the
right representation for template arguments.
llvm-svn: 64154
to a class template. For example, the template-id 'vector<int>' now
has a nice, sugary type in the type system. What we can do now:
- Parse template-ids like 'vector<int>' (where 'vector' names a
class template) and form proper types for them in the type system.
- Parse icky template-ids like 'A<5>' and 'A<(5 > 0)>' properly,
using (sadly) a bool in the parser to tell it whether '>' should
be treated as an operator or not.
This is a baby-step, with major problems and limitations:
- There are currently two ways that we handle template arguments
(whether they are types or expressions). These will be merged, and,
most likely, TemplateArg will disappear.
- We don't have any notion of the declaration of class template
specializations or of template instantiations, so all template-ids
are fancy names for 'int' :)
llvm-svn: 64153
redeclarations. For example, checks that a class template
redeclaration has the same template parameters as previous
declarations.
Detangled class-template checking from ActOnTag, whose logic was
getting rather convoluted because it tried to handle C, C++, and C++
template semantics in one shot.
Made some inroads toward eliminating extraneous "declaration does not
declare anything" errors by adding an "error" type specifier.
llvm-svn: 63973
.def file for each library. This means that adding a diagnostic
to sema doesn't require all the other libraries to be rebuilt.
Patch by Anders Johnsen!
llvm-svn: 63111
become useful or correct until we (1) parse template arguments
correctly, (2) have some way to turn template-ids into types,
declarators, etc., and (3) have a real representation of templates.
llvm-svn: 61208
parameters, with some semantic analysis:
- Template parameters are introduced into template parameter scope
- Complain about template parameter shadowing (except in Microsoft mode)
Note that we leak template parameter declarations like crazy, a
problem we'll remedy once we actually create proper declarations for
templates.
Next up: dependent types and value-dependent/type-dependent
expressions.
llvm-svn: 60597
- Template parameter scope to hold the template parameters
- Template parameter context for parsing declarators
- Actions for template type parameters and non-type template
parameters
llvm-svn: 60387
Douglas Gregor