Given 'typename T typename U', we would correctly diagnose the missing
comma, but incorrectly disambiguate the first parameter as being a
non-type parameter and complain that the 'T' is not a qualified-id.
See also gcc.gnu.org/PR86998.
llvm-svn: 340074
Basically, "AttributeList" loses all list-like mechanisms, ParsedAttributes is
switched to use a TinyPtrVector (and a ParsedAttributesView is created to
have a non-allocating attributes list). DeclaratorChunk gets the later kind,
Declarator/DeclSpec keep ParsedAttributes.
Iterators are added to the ParsedAttribute types so that for-loops work.
llvm-svn: 336945
binary operator.
Factor out the checking for a comma within potential angle brackets and
also call it from contexts where we parse a comma-separated list of
arguments or initializers.
llvm-svn: 335699
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
When a '>>' token is split into two '>' tokens (in C++11 onwards), or (as an
extension) when we do the same for other tokens starting with a '>', we can't
just use a location pointing to the first '>' as the location of the split
token, because that would result in our miscomputing the length and spelling
for the token. As a consequence, for example, a refactoring replacing 'A<X>'
with something else would sometimes replace one character too many, and
similarly diagnostics highlighting a template-id source range would highlight
one character too many.
Fix this by creating an expansion range covering the first character of the
'>>' token, whose spelling is '>'. For this to work, we generalize the
expansion range of a macro FileID to be either a token range (the common case)
or a character range (used in this new case).
llvm-svn: 331155
Avoiding
error: no matching function for call to 'makeArrayRef'
at
../tools/clang/lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp:373:17
By using a local C array as input to makeArrayRef.
Not sure if this is the best solution, but it makes the code
compile again.
llvm-svn: 330802
This patch is a tweak of changyu's patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40381. It differs in that the recognition of the 'concept' token is moved into the machinery that recognizes declaration-specifiers - this allows us to leverage the attribute handling machinery more seamlessly.
See the test file to get a sense of the basic parsing that this patch supports.
There is much more work to be done before concepts are usable...
Thanks Changyu!
llvm-svn: 330794
The current support of the feature produces only 2 lines in report:
-Some general Code Generation Time;
-Total time of Backend Consumer actions.
This patch extends Clang time report with new lines related to Preprocessor, Include Filea Search, Parsing, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43578
llvm-svn: 329684
Specifically, we would not properly parse these types within template arguments
(for non-type template parameters), and in tentative parses. Fixing both of
these essentially requires that we parse deduced template specialization types
as types in all contexts, even in template argument lists -- in particular,
tentative parsing may look ahead and annotate a deduced template specialization
type before we figure out that we're actually supposed to treat the tokens as a
template-name. We deal with this by simply permitting deduced template
specialization types when parsing template arguments, and converting them to
template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 326299
This patch addresses a FIXME and has the template-parameter processing functions return a more derived common type NamedDecl (as opposed to a type needlessly higher up in the inheritance hierarchy : Decl).
llvm-svn: 321409
When we have enabled cache for global completions we did not have
diagnostics for Bar and could not complete Ba as in provided code
example.
template <typename T>
struct Foo { T member; };
template<typename T> using Bar = Foo<T>;
int main() {
Ba
}
(This is the fixed version of r 311442, which was reverted in r311445.)
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35355
llvm-svn: 312780
When we have enabled cache for global completions we did not have
diagnostics for Bar and could not complete Ba as in provided code
example.
template <typename T>
struct Foo { T member; };
template<typename T> using Bar = Foo<T>;
int main() {
Ba
}
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35355
llvm-svn: 311442
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
definition or non-reference class type.
The crash occurs when there is a template parameter list in a class that
is missing the closing angle bracket followed by a definition of a
struct. For example:
class C0 {
public:
template<typename T, typename T1 = T // missing closing angle bracket
struct S0 {};
C0() : m(new S0<int>) {}
S0<int> *m;
};
This happens because the parsed struct is added to the scope of the
enclosing class without having its access specifier set, which results
in an assertion failure in SemaAccess.cpp later.
This commit fixes the crash by adding the parsed struct to the enclosing
file scope and marking structs as invalid if they are defined in
template parameter lists.
rdar://problem/31783961
rdar://problem/19570630
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33606
llvm-svn: 306317
A refactoring of TemplateIdAnnotation that uses TrailingObjects to create a variably-sized object on the heap.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31414
Thanks to Aaron B for the review!
llvm-svn: 303594
This patch ensures that clang processes the expression-nodes that are generated when disambiguating between types and expressions within template arguments as constant-expressions by installing the ConstantEvaluated ExpressionEvaluationContext just before attempting the disambiguation - and then making sure that Context carries through into ParseConstantExpression (by refactoring it out into a function that does not create its own EvaluationContext: ParseConstantExpressionInExprEvalContext)
Note, prior to this patch, trunk would correctly disambiguate and identify the expression as an expression - and while it would annotate the token with the expression - it would fail to complete the odr-use processing (specifically, failing to trigger Sema::UpdateMarkingForLValueToRValue as is done for all Constant Expressions, which would remove it from being considered odr-used). By installing the ConstantExpression Evaluation Context prior to disambiguation, and making sure it carries though, we ensure correct processing of the expression-node.
For e.g:
template<int> struct X { };
void f() {
const int N = 10;
X<N> x; // should be OK.
[] { return X<N>{}; }; // Should be OK - no capture - but clang errors!
}
See a related bug: https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=25627
In summary (and reiteration), the fix is as follows:
- Remove the EnteredConstantEvaluatedContext action from ParseTemplateArgumentList (relying on ParseTemplateArgument getting it right)
- Add the EnteredConstantEvaluatedContext action just prior to undergoing the disambiguating parse, and if the parse succeeds for an expression, carry the context though into a refactored version of ParseConstantExpression that does not create its own ExpressionEvaluationContext.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D31588 for additional context regarding some of the more fragile and complicated approaches attempted, and Richard's feedback that eventually shaped the simpler and more robust rendition that is being committed.
Thanks Richard!
llvm-svn: 303492
We were incorrectly setting PrevTokLocation to the first token in the
annotation token instead of the last when consuming it. To fix this without
adding a complex switch to the hot path through ConsumeToken, we now have a
ConsumeAnnotationToken function for consuming annotation tokens in addition
to the other Consume*Token special case functions.
llvm-svn: 303372
- also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17.
- update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed.
llvm-svn: 299316
name. If the dependent name happened to end in a template-id (X<T>::Y<U>), we
would fail to notice that the 'typename' keyword is missing when resolving it
to a type.
It turns out that GCC has a similar bug. If this shows up in much real code, we
can easily downgrade this to an ExtWarn.
llvm-svn: 293815
Under this defect resolution, the injected-class-name of a class or class
template cannot be used except in very limited circumstances (when declaring a
constructor, in a nested-name-specifier, in a base-specifier, or in an
elaborated-type-specifier). This is apparently done to make parsing easier, but
it's a pain for us since we don't know whether a template-id using the
injected-class-name is valid at the point when we annotate it (we don't yet
know whether the template-id will become part of an elaborated-type-specifier).
As a tentative resolution to a perceived language defect, mem-initializer-ids
are added to the list of exceptions here (they generally follow the same rules
as base-specifiers).
When the reference to the injected-class-name uses the 'typename' or 'template'
keywords, we permit it to be used to name a type or template as an extension;
other compilers also accept some cases in this area. There are also a couple of
corner cases with dependent template names that we do not yet diagnose, but
which will also get this treatment.
llvm-svn: 292518
classes.
MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.
Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.
It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.
llvm-svn: 272774
if we are parsing a template specialization.
This commit makes changes to clear the TemplateParamScope bit and set
the TemplateParamParent field of the current scope to null if a template
specialization is being parsed.
Before this commit, Sema::ActOnStartOfLambdaDefinition would check
whether the parent template scope had any decls to determine whether
or not a template specialization was being parsed. This wasn't correct
since it couldn't distinguish between a real template specialization and
a template defintion with an unnamed template parameter (only template
parameters with names are added to the scope's decl list). To fix the
bug, this commit changes the code to check the pointer to the parent
template scope rather than the decl list.
rdar://problem/23440346
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19175
llvm-svn: 267975
While this won't help fix things like the bug that r260219 addressed, it
seems like good tidy up to have anyway.
(it might be nice if "makeArrayRef" always produced a MutableArrayRef &
let it decay to an ArrayRef when needed - then I'd use that for the
MutableArrayRefs in this patch)
If we had std::dynarray I'd use that instead of unique_ptr+size_t,
ideally (but then it'd have to be threaded down through the Preprocessor
all the way - no idea how painful that would be)
llvm-svn: 260246
In the context where we break one tok::greatergreater into two
tok::greater in order to correctly update the cached tokens; update the
CachedTokens with two tok::greater only if ParseGreaterThanInTemplateList
clients asks to consume the last token. Otherwise we only need to add
one because the second is already added later on, as a not yet cached token.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16906
rdar://problem/24488367
llvm-svn: 259910
Consider the following ObjC++ snippet:
--
@protocol PA;
@protocol PB;
@class NSArray<ObjectType>;
typedef int some_t;
id<PA> FA(NSArray<id<PB>> *h, some_t group);
--
This would hit an assertion in the parser after generating an annotation token
while trying to update the token cache:
Assertion failed: (CachedTokens[CachedLexPos-1].getLastLoc() == Tok.getAnnotationEndLoc() && "The annotation should be until the most recent cached token")
...
7 clang::Preprocessor::AnnotatePreviousCachedTokens(clang::Token const&) + 494
8 clang::Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeTokenAfterScopeSpec(bool, bool, clang::CXXScopeSpec&, bool) + 1163
9 clang::Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken(bool, bool) + 361
10 clang::Parser::isCXXDeclarationSpecifier(clang::Parser::TPResult, bool*) + 598
...
The cached preprocessor token in this case is:
greatergreater '>>' Loc=<testcase.mm:7:24>
while the annotation ("NSArray<id<PB>>") ends at "testcase.mm:7:25", hence the
assertion.
Properly update the CachedTokens during template parsing to contain
two greater tokens instead of a greatergreater.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15173
rdar://problem/23494277
llvm-svn: 259311
For
void f() {
union { int i; };
}
clang used to omit the RecordDecl from the anonymous union from the AST.
That's because the code creating it only called PushOnScopeChains(), which adds
it to the current DeclContext, which here is the function's DeclContext. But
RecursiveASTVisitor doesn't descent into all decls in a FunctionDecl.
Instead, for DeclContexts that contain statements, return the RecordDecl so
that it can be included in the DeclStmt containing the VarDecl for the union.
Interesting bits from the AST before this change:
|-FunctionDecl
| `-CompoundStmt
| |-DeclStmt
| | `-VarDecl 0x589cd60 <col:3> col:3 implicit used 'union (anonymous at test.cc:3:3)' callinit
After this change:
-FunctionDecl
| `-CompoundStmt
| |-DeclStmt
| | |-CXXRecordDecl 0x4612e48 <col:3, col:18> col:3 union definition
| | | |-FieldDecl 0x4612f70 <col:11, col:15> col:15 referenced i 'int'
| | `-VarDecl 0x4613010 <col:3> col:3 implicit used 'union (anonymous at test.cc:3:3)' callinit
This is now closer to how anonymous struct and unions are represented as
members of structs. It also enabled deleting some one-off code in the
template instantiation code.
Finally, it fixes a crash with ASTMatchers, see the included test case
(this fixes http://crbug.com/580749).
llvm-svn: 259079
Also address a typo from a prior patch that performed a similar fix during Parsing of default non-type template arguments. I left the RAII ExpressionEvaluationContext variable Name as Unevaluated though we had switched the context to ConstantEvaluated.
There should be no functionality change here - since when expression evaluation context is popped off, for the most part these two contexts currently behave similarly in regards to lambda diagnostics and odr-use tracking.
Like its parsing counterpart, this patch presages the advent of constexpr lambda patches...
llvm-svn: 253590
This patch emits a more appropriate (but still noisy) diagnostic stream when a lambda-expression is encountered within a non-type default argument.
For e.g. template<int N = ([] { return 5; }())> int f();
As opposed to complaining that a lambda expression is not allowed in an unevaluated operand, the patch complains about the lambda being forbidden in a constant expression context (which will be allowed in C++17 now that they have been accepted by EWG, unless of course CWG or national bodies (that have so far shown no signs of concern) rise in protest)
As I start submitting patches for constexpr lambdas (http://wg21.link/P0170R0) under C++1z (OK'd by Richard Smith at Kona), this will be one less change to make.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 253431
Richard Smith