Add an OutputDesc class inheriting from SectionCommand. An OutputDesc wraps an
OutputSection. This change allows InputSection::getParent to be inlined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120650
In GNU ld, the definition precedence is: regular symbol assignment > relocatable object definition > `PROVIDE` symbol assignment.
GNU ld's internal linker scripts define the non-reserved (by C and C++)
edata/end/etext with `PROVIDE` so the relocatable object definition takes
precedence. This makes sense because `int end;` is valid.
We currently redefine such symbols if they are COMMON, but not if they are
regular definitions, so `int end;` with -fcommon is essentially a UB in ld.lld.
Fix this (also improve consistency and match GNU ld) by using the
`isDefined` code path for `isCommon`. In GNU ld, reserved identifiers like
`__ehdr_start` do not use `PROVIDE`, while we treat them all as `PROVIDE`, this
seems fine.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120389
See the updated insert-before.test for the effects: many synthetic
sections are SHF_ALLOC|SHF_WRITE. If they are discarded, we don't want
to propagate their flags to subsequent output section descriptions.
`getFirstInputSection(sec) == nullptr` can technically be merged into
`isDiscardable` but I'd like to postpone that as not sharing code may give more
refactoring opportunity.
Depends on D118529.
Reviewed By: peter.smith, bluca
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118530
adjustSectionsBeforeSorting updates some output section attributes
(alignment/flags) and removes discardable empty sections. When it is called,
INSERT commands have not been processed. Therefore the flags propagation rule
may not affect output sections defined in an INSERT command properly.
Fix this by moving processInsertCommands before adjustSectionsBeforeSorting.
adjustSectionsBeforeSorting is somewhat misnamed. The order between it and
sortInputSections does not matter. With the pass shuffle, the name of
adjustSectionsBeforeSorting becomes wrong. Therefore rename it. The new
name is not set into stone. The function mixes several tasks and the
code may be refactored in a way that we may give them more meaningful
names.
With this patch, I think the behavior of attribute propagation becomes more
reasonable. In particular, in the absence of non-INSERT SECTIONS,
inserting a section after a SHF_ALLOC one will give us a SHF_ALLOC section,
not a non-SHF_ALLOC one (see linkerscript/insert-after.test).
Reviewed By: peter.smith, bluca
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118529
Move all variables at file-scope or function-static-scope into a hosting structure (lld::CommonLinkerContext) that lives at lldMain()-scope. Drivers will inherit from this structure and add their own global state, in the same way as for the existing COFFLinkerContext.
See discussion in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-June/151184.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108850
db08df0570 does not work because part.relrDyn is
a unique_ptr and `reset` destroys the object which may still be referenced.
This commit uses the D114180 approach. Also improve the test to check that there
is no R_X86_64_RELATIVE.
to prepare for D116838, otherwise for linkerscript/discard-section-err.s,
there will be a null pointer dereference in `part.relrDyn->getParent()->size`
in `finalizeSynthetic(part.relrDyn.get())`.
and remove associated make<XXX> calls.
gnuHash and sysvHash are unchanged, otherwise LinkerScript::discard would
destroy the objects which may be referenced by input section descriptions.
My x86-64 lld executable is 121+KiB smaller.
Currently the singleton `config` is assigned by `config = make<Configuration>()`
and (if `canExitEarly` is false) destroyed by `lld::freeArena`.
`make<Configuration>` allocates a stab with `malloc(4096)`. This both wastes
memory and bloats the executable (every type instantiates `BumpPtrAllocator`
which costs more than 1KiB code on x86-64).
(No need to worry about `clang::no_destroy`. Regular invocations (`canExitEarly`
is true) call `_Exit` via llvm::sys::Process::ExitNoCleanup.)
Reviewed By: lichray
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116143
Sorting the prefixes by decreasing frequency can improve performance.
.gcc_except_table is relatively frequent, so move it ahead.
.ctors and .dtors mostly disappear and should be the last.
I attempted to remove it 1 or 2 year ago but kept it just to have a good
diagnostic in case the output section is nullptr (should be impossible).
It is long enough that we haven't seen such a case.
BaseCommand was picked when PHDRS/INSERT/etc were not implemented. Rename it to
SectionCommand to match `sectionCommands` and make it clear that the commands
are used in SECTIONS (except a special case for SymbolAssignment).
Also, improve naming of some BaseCommand variables (base -> cmd).
This partially reverts r315409: the description applies to LinkerScript, but not
to OutputSection.
The name "sectionCommands" is used in both LinkerScript::sectionCommands and
OutputSection::sectionCommands, which may lead to confusion.
"commands" in OutputSection has no ambiguity because there are no other types
of commands.
The attribute 'r' allows (or disallows for the negative case) read-only
sections, i.e. ones without the SHF_WRITE flag, to be assigned to the
memory region. Before the patch, lld could put a section in the wrong
region or fail with "error: no memory region specified for section".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113771
When aligning the start address of an output section introduces a gap between the current dot pointer
and the new aligned address, we were already properly expanding the memory region, if available.
D74286 introduced a new behavior to also align the LMA address if an LMA region is specified.
However, this did not expand the corresponding LMA region.
Now, we also expand the LMA region if it is set.
This fixes PR52510.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114166
Non-allocatable sections are not part of the memory image of the
program, so there is no need to find memory regions for them either
matching properties or handling explicit assignments. The early test
and return help to simplify LinkerScript::findMemoryRegion() a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113768
An orphan section should be placed in the same memory region as its
anchor section if the latter specifies the memory region explicitly.
If there is no explicit assignment for the anchor section in the linker
script, its memory region is selected by matching attributes, and the
same should be done for the orphan section.
Before the patch, some scripts that were handled smoothly in GNU ld
caused an "error: no memory region specified for section" in lld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112925
GNU ld doesn't support multiple SHF_TLS SHT_NOBITS output sections (it restores
the address after an SHF_TLS SHT_NOBITS section, so consecutive SHF_TLS
SHT_NOBITS sections will have conflicting address ranges).
That said, `threadBssOffset` implements limited support for consecutive SHF_TLS
SHT_NOBITS sections. (SHF_TLS SHT_PROGBITS following a SHF_TLS SHT_NOBITS can still be
incorrect.)
`.` in an output section description of an SHF_TLS SHT_NOBITS section is
incorrect. (https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-July/151974.html)
This patch saves the end address of the previous tbss section in
`ctx->tbssAddr`, changes `dot` in the beginning of `assignOffset` so
that `.` evaluation will be correct.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107208
For
```
SECTIONS {
text.0 : {}
text.1 : {}
text.2 : {}
} INSERT AFTER .data;
```
the current order is `.data text.2 text.1 text.0`. It makes more sense to
preserve the specified order and thus improve compatibility with GNU ld.
For
```
SECTIONS { text.0 : {} } INSERT AFTER .data;
SECTIONS { text.3 : {} } INSERT AFTER .data;
```
GNU ld somehow collects sections with `INSERT AFTER .data` together (IMO
inconsistent) but I think it makes more sense to execute the commands in order
and get `.data text.3 text.0` instead.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105158
This implements https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26404
An `OVERWRITE_SECTIONS` command is a `SECTIONS` variant which contains several
output section descriptions. The output sections do not have specify an order.
Similar to `INSERT [BEFORE|AFTER]`, `LinkerScript::hasSectionsCommand` is not
set, so the built-in rules (see `docs/ELF/linker_script.rst`) still apply.
`OVERWRITE_SECTIONS` can be more convenient than `INSERT` because it does not
need an anchor section.
The initial syntax is intentionally narrow to facilitate backward compatible
extensions in the future. Symbol assignments cannot be used.
This feature is versatile. To list a few usage:
* Use `section : { KEEP(...) }` to retain input sections under GC
* Define encapsulation symbols (start/end) for an output section
* Use `section : ALIGN(...) : { ... }` to overalign an output section (similar to ld64 `-sectalign`)
When an output section is specified by both `OVERWRITE_SECTIONS` and
`INSERT`, `INSERT` is processed after overwrite sections. To make this work,
this patch changes `InsertCommand` to use name based matching instead of pointer
based matching. (This may cause a difference when `INSERT` moves one output
section more than once. Such duplicate commands should not be used in practice
(seems that in GNU ld the output sections may just disappear).)
A linker script can be used without -T/--script. The traditional `SECTIONS`
commands are concatenated, so a wrong rule can be more noticeable from the
section order. This feature if misused can be less noticeable, just like
`INSERT`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103303
This reverts a side effect introduced in the code cleanup patch D43571:
LLD started to emit empty output sections that are explicitly assigned to a segment.
This patch fixes the issue by removing the !sec.phdrs.empty() special case from
isDiscardable. As compensation, we add an early phdrs propagation step (see the inline comment).
This is similar to one that we do in adjustSectionsAfterSorting.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92301
According to
https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/Input-Section-Basics.html#Input-Section-Basics
for `*(.a .b)`, the order should match the input order:
* for `ld 1.o 2.o`, sections from 1.o precede sections from 2.o
* within a file, `.a` and `.b` appear in the section header table order
This patch implements the behavior. The interaction with `SORT*` and --sort-section is:
Matched sections are ordered by radix sort with the keys being `(SORT*, --sort-section, input order)`,
where `SORT*` (if present) is most significant.
> Note, multiple `SORT*` within an input section description has undocumented and
> confusing behaviors in GNU ld:
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-November/114083.html
> Therefore multiple `SORT*` is not the focus for this patch but
> this patch still strives to have an explainable behavior.
As an example, we partition `SORT(a.*) b.* c.* SORT(d.*)`, into
`SORT(a.*) | b.* c.* | SORT(d.*)` and perform sorting within groups. Sections
matched by patterns between two `SORT*` are sorted by input order. If
--sort-alignment is given, they are sorted by --sort-alignment, breaking tie by
input order.
This patch also allows a section to be matched by multiple patterns, previously
duplicated sections could occupy more space in the output and had erroneous zero bytes.
The patch is in preparation for support for
`*(SORT_BY_INIT_PRIORITY(.init_array.* .ctors.*)) *(.init_array .ctors)`,
which will allow LLD to mix .ctors*/.init_array* like GNU ld (gold's --ctors-in-init-array)
PR44698 and PR48096
Reviewed By: grimar, psmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91127
Fangrui Song