Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith d209967a68 Remove warning on over-wide bit-field of boolean type; there's no risk that
someone thought all the bits would be value bits in this case.

Also fix the wording of the warning -- it claimed that the width of 'bool' is
8, which is not correct; the width is 1 bit, whereas the size is 8 bits in our
implementation.

llvm-svn: 248435
2015-09-23 22:07:44 +00:00
Rachel Craik 022bdc7d73 C11 _Bool bitfield diagnostic
Summary: Implement DR262 (for C). This patch will mainly affect bitfields of type _Bool

Reviewers: fraggamuffin, rsmith

Subscribers: hubert.reinterpretcast, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10018

llvm-svn: 247618
2015-09-14 21:27:36 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis 3446898e90 Use -emit-llvm-only in the test.
llvm-svn: 114636
2010-09-23 09:40:20 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis ca0d0cd3b9 Implement -Wpadded and -Wpacked.
-Wpadded warns when undesired padding is introduced in a struct. (rdar://7469556)
-Wpacked warns if a struct is given the packed attribute, but the packed attribute has no effect
  on the layout or the size of the struct. Such structs may be mis-aligned for little benefit.

The warnings are emitted at the point where layout is calculated, that is at RecordLayoutBuilder.
To avoid calculating the layouts of all structs regardless of whether they are needed or not,
I let the layouts be lazily constructed when needed. This has the disadvantage that the above warnings
will be emitted only when they are used for IR gen, and not e.g with -fsyntax-only:

$ cat t.c
struct S {
  char c;
  int i;
};
void f(struct S* s) {}

$ clang -fsyntax-only -Wpadded t.c
$ clang -c -Wpadded t.c -o t.o
t.c:3:7: warning: padding struct 'struct S' with 3 bytes to align 'i' [-Wpadded]
  int i;
      ^
1 warning generated.

This is a good tradeoff between providing the warnings and not calculating layouts for all
structs in case the user has enabled a couple of rarely used warnings.

llvm-svn: 114544
2010-09-22 14:32:24 +00:00