Summary:
This is RFC for fixes in poison-related functions of ValueTracking.
These functions assume that a value can be poison bitwisely, but the semantics
of bitwise poison is not clear at the moment.
Allowing a value to have bitwise poison adds complexity to reasoning about
correctness of optimizations.
This patch makes the analysis functions simply assume that a value is
either fully poison or not, which has been used to understand the correctness
of a few previous optimizations.
The bitwise poison semantics seems to be only used by these functions as well.
In terms of implementation, using value-wise poison concept makes existing
functions do more precise analysis, which is what this patch contains.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, reames, nikic, nlopes, regehr
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78503
Summary:
This is RFC for fixes in poison-related functions of ValueTracking.
These functions assume that a value can be poison bitwisely, but the semantics
of bitwise poison is not clear at the moment.
Allowing a value to have bitwise poison adds complexity to reasoning about
correctness of optimizations.
This patch makes the analysis functions simply assume that a value is
either fully poison or not, which has been used to understand the correctness
of a few previous optimizations.
The bitwise poison semantics seems to be only used by these functions as well.
In terms of implementation, using value-wise poison concept makes existing
functions do more precise analysis, which is what this patch contains.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, reames, nikic, nlopes, regehr
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78503
Add support to optionally emit different instrumentation for accesses to
volatile variables. While the default TSAN runtime likely will never
require this feature, other runtimes for different environments that
have subtly different memory models or assumptions may require
distinguishing volatiles.
One such environment are OS kernels, where volatile is still used in
various places for various reasons, and often declare volatile to be
"safe enough" even in multi-threaded contexts. One such example is the
Linux kernel, which implements various synchronization primitives using
volatile (READ_ONCE(), WRITE_ONCE()). Here the Kernel Concurrency
Sanitizer (KCSAN) [1], is a runtime that uses TSAN instrumentation but
otherwise implements a very different approach to race detection from
TSAN.
While in the Linux kernel it is generally discouraged to use volatiles
explicitly, the topic will likely come up again, and we will eventually
need to distinguish volatile accesses [2]. The other use-case is
ignoring data races on specially marked variables in the kernel, for
example bit-flags (here we may hide 'volatile' behind a different name
such as 'no_data_race').
[1] https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki/KCSAN
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CANpmjNOfXNE-Zh3MNP=-gmnhvKbsfUfTtWkyg_=VqTxS4nnptQ@mail.gmail.com
Author: melver (Marco Elver)
Reviewed-in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78554
Summary:
Following up on the comments on D77638.
Not undoing rGd6525eff5ebfa0ef1d6cd75cb9b40b1881e7a707 here at the moment, since I don't know how to test mac builds. Please let me know if I should include that here too.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77889
Summary:
Updated CallPromotionUtils and impacted sites. Parameters that are
expected to be non-null, and return values that are guranteed non-null,
were replaced with CallBase references rather than pointers.
Left FIXME in places where more changes are facilitated by CallBase, but
aren't CallSites: Instruction* parameters or return values, for example,
where the contract that they are actually CallBase values.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, wmi
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, eraman, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77930
Summary:
This commit adds two command-line options to clang.
These options let the user decide which functions will receive SanitizerCoverage instrumentation.
This is most useful in the libFuzzer use case, where it enables targeted coverage-guided fuzzing.
Patch by Yannis Juglaret of DGA-MI, Rennes, France
libFuzzer tests its target against an evolving corpus, and relies on SanitizerCoverage instrumentation to collect the code coverage information that drives corpus evolution. Currently, libFuzzer collects such information for all functions of the target under test, and adds to the corpus every mutated sample that finds a new code coverage path in any function of the target. We propose instead to let the user specify which functions' code coverage information is relevant for building the upcoming fuzzing campaign's corpus. To this end, we add two new command line options for clang, enabling targeted coverage-guided fuzzing with libFuzzer. We see targeted coverage guided fuzzing as a simple way to leverage libFuzzer for big targets with thousands of functions or multiple dependencies. We publish this patch as work from DGA-MI of Rennes, France, with proper authorization from the hierarchy.
Targeted coverage-guided fuzzing can accelerate bug finding for two reasons. First, the compiler will avoid costly instrumentation for non-relevant functions, accelerating fuzzer execution for each call to any of these functions. Second, the built fuzzer will produce and use a more accurate corpus, because it will not keep the samples that find new coverage paths in non-relevant functions.
The two new command line options are `-fsanitize-coverage-whitelist` and `-fsanitize-coverage-blacklist`. They accept files in the same format as the existing `-fsanitize-blacklist` option <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerSpecialCaseList.html#format>. The new options influence SanitizerCoverage so that it will only instrument a subset of the functions in the target. We explain these options in detail in `clang/docs/SanitizerCoverage.rst`.
Consider now the woff2 fuzzing example from the libFuzzer tutorial <https://github.com/google/fuzzer-test-suite/blob/master/tutorial/libFuzzerTutorial.md>. We are aware that we cannot conclude much from this example because mutating compressed data is generally a bad idea, but let us use it anyway as an illustration for its simplicity. Let us use an empty blacklist together with one of the three following whitelists:
```
# (a)
src:*
fun:*
# (b)
src:SRC/*
fun:*
# (c)
src:SRC/src/woff2_dec.cc
fun:*
```
Running the built fuzzers shows how many instrumentation points the compiler adds, the fuzzer will output //XXX PCs//. Whitelist (a) is the instrument-everything whitelist, it produces 11912 instrumentation points. Whitelist (b) focuses coverage to instrument woff2 source code only, ignoring the dependency code for brotli (de)compression; it produces 3984 instrumented instrumentation points. Whitelist (c) focuses coverage to only instrument functions in the main file that deals with WOFF2 to TTF conversion, resulting in 1056 instrumentation points.
For experimentation purposes, we ran each fuzzer approximately 100 times, single process, with the initial corpus provided in the tutorial. We let the fuzzer run until it either found the heap buffer overflow or went out of memory. On this simple example, whitelists (b) and (c) found the heap buffer overflow more reliably and 5x faster than whitelist (a). The average execution times when finding the heap buffer overflow were as follows: (a) 904 s, (b) 156 s, and (c) 176 s.
We explain these results by the fact that WOFF2 to TTF conversion calls the brotli decompression algorithm's functions, which are mostly irrelevant for finding bugs in WOFF2 font reconstruction but nevertheless instrumented and used by whitelist (a) to guide fuzzing. This results in longer execution time for these functions and a partially irrelevant corpus. Contrary to whitelist (a), whitelists (b) and (c) will execute brotli-related functions without instrumentation overhead, and ignore new code paths found in them. This results in faster bug finding for WOFF2 font reconstruction.
The results for whitelist (b) are similar to the ones for whitelist (c). Indeed, WOFF2 to TTF conversion calls functions that are mostly located in SRC/src/woff2_dec.cc. The 2892 extra instrumentation points allowed by whitelist (b) do not tamper with bug finding, even though they are mostly irrelevant, simply because most of these functions do not get called. We get a slightly faster average time for bug finding with whitelist (b), which might indicate that some of the extra instrumentation points are actually relevant, or might just be random noise.
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: morehouse, vitalybuka
Subscribers: pratyai, vitalybuka, eternalsakura, xwlin222, dende, srhines, kubamracek, #sanitizers, lebedev.ri, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63616
Summary:
This patch establishes memory layout and adds instrumentation. It does
not add runtime support and does not enable MSan, which will be done
separately.
Memory layout is based on PPC64, with the exception that XorMask
is not used - low and high memory addresses are chosen in a way that
applying AndMask to low and high memory produces non-overlapping
results.
VarArgHelper is based on AMD64. It might be tempting to share some
code between the two implementations, but we need to keep in mind that
all the ABI similarities are coincidental, and therefore any such
sharing might backfire.
copyRegSaveArea() indiscriminately copies the entire register save area
shadow, however, fragments thereof not filled by the corresponding
visitCallSite() invocation contain irrelevant data. Whether or not this
can lead to practical problems is unclear, hence a simple TODO comment.
Note that the behavior of the related copyOverflowArea() is correct: it
copies only the vararg-related fragment of the overflow area shadow.
VarArgHelper test is based on the AArch64 one.
s390x ABI requires that arguments are zero-extended to 64 bits. This is
particularly important for __msan_maybe_warning_*() and
__msan_maybe_store_origin_*() shadow and origin arguments, since non
zeroed upper parts thereof confuse these functions. Therefore, add ZExt
attribute to the corresponding parameters.
Add ZExt attribute checks to msan-basic.ll. Since with
-msan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold=0 instrumentation looks quite
different, introduce the new CHECK-CALLS check prefix.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka, uweigand, jonpa
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits, stefansf, Andreas-Krebbel
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76624
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, rriddle, efriedma
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77262
Summary:
New SanitizerCoverage feature `inline-bool-flag` which inserts an
atomic store of `1` to a boolean (which is an 8bit integer in
practice) flag on every instrumented edge.
Implementation-wise it's very similar to `inline-8bit-counters`
features. So, much of wiring and test just follows the same pattern.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya, jfb, cfe-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77244
Now that we have scalable vectors, there's a distinction that isn't
getting captured in the original SequentialType: some vectors don't have
a known element count, so counting the number of elements doesn't make
sense.
In some cases, there's a better way to express the commonality using
other methods. If we're dealing with GEPs, there's GEP methods; if we're
dealing with a ConstantDataSequential, we can query its element type
directly.
In the relatively few remaining cases, I just decided to write out
the type checks. We're talking about relatively few places, and I think
the abstraction doesn't really carry its weight. (See thread "[RFC]
Refactor class hierarchy of VectorType in the IR" on llvmdev.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75661
Summary:
In some cases, ASan may insert instrumentation before function arguments
have been stored into their allocas. This causes two issues:
1) The argument value must be spilled until it can be stored into the
reserved alloca, wasting a stack slot.
2) Until the store occurs in a later basic block, the debug location
will point to the wrong frame offset, and backtraces will show an
uninitialized value.
The proposed solution is to move instructions which initialize allocas
for arguments up into the entry block, before the position where ASan
starts inserting its instrumentation.
For the motivating test case, before the patch we see:
```
| 0033: movq %rdi, 0x68(%rbx) | | DW_TAG_formal_parameter |
| ... | | DW_AT_name ("a") |
| 00d1: movq 0x68(%rbx), %rsi | | DW_AT_location (RBX+0x90) |
| 00d5: movq %rsi, 0x90(%rbx) | | ^ not correct ... |
```
and after the patch we see:
```
| 002f: movq %rdi, 0x70(%rbx) | | DW_TAG_formal_parameter |
| | | DW_AT_name ("a") |
| | | DW_AT_location (RBX+0x70) |
```
rdar://61122691
Reviewers: aprantl, eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77182
Summary:
This is a roll forward of D77394 minus AlignmentFromAssumptions (which needs to be addressed separately)
Differences from D77394:
- DebugStr() now prints the alignment value or `None` and no more `Align(x)` or `MaybeAlign(x)`
- This is to keep Warning message consistent (CodeGen/SystemZ/alloca-04.ll)
- Removed a few unneeded headers from Alignment (since it's included everywhere it's better to keep the dependencies to a minimum)
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77537
Instead, represent the mask as out-of-line data in the instruction. This
should be more efficient in the places that currently use
getShuffleVector(), and paves the way for further changes to add new
shuffles for scalable vectors.
This doesn't change the syntax in textual IR. And I don't currently plan
to change the bitcode encoding in this patch, although we'll probably
need to do something once we extend shufflevector for scalable types.
I expect that once this is finished, we can then replace the raw "mask"
with something more appropriate for scalable vectors. Not sure exactly
what this looks like at the moment, but there are a few different ways
we could handle it. Maybe we could try to describe specific shuffles.
Or maybe we could define it in terms of a function to convert a fixed-length
array into an appropriate scalable vector, using a "step", or something
like that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72467
Summary:
Rename `succ_const_iterator` to `const_succ_iterator` and
`succ_const_range` to `const_succ_range` for consistency with the
predecessor iterators, and the corresponding iterators in
MachineBasicBlock.
Reviewers: nicholas, dblaikie, nlewycky
Subscribers: hiraditya, bmahjour, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75952
Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).
---
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Summary:
When -dfsan-event-callbacks is specified, insert a call to
__dfsan_mem_transfer_callback on every memcpy and memmove.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, kcc, pcc
Reviewed By: kcc
Subscribers: eugenis, hiraditya, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75386
Summary:
For now just insert the callback for stores, similar to how MSan tracks
origins. In the future we may want to add callbacks for loads, memcpy,
function calls, CMPs, etc.
Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka, kcc, eugenis
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, kcc, eugenis
Subscribers: eugenis, hiraditya, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, kcc
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75312
See discussion on PR44792.
This reverts commit 02ce9d8ef5.
It also reverts the follow-up commits
8f46269f0 "[profile] Don't dump counters when forking and don't reset when calling exec** functions"
62c7d8402 "[profile] gcov_mutex must be static"
Summary:
There is no need to write out gcdas when forking because we can just reset the counters in the parent process.
Let say a counter is N before the fork, then fork and this counter is set to 0 in the child process.
In the parent process, the counter is incremented by P and in the child process it's incremented by C.
When dump is ran at exit, parent process will dump N+P for the given counter and the child process will dump 0+C, so when the gcdas are merged the resulting counter will be N+P+C.
About exec** functions, since the current process is replaced by an another one there is no need to reset the counters but just write out the gcdas since the counters are definitely lost.
To avoid to have lists in a bad state, we just lock them during the fork and the flush (if called explicitely) and lock them when an element is added.
Reviewers: marco-c
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74953
D73835 will make IRBuilder no longer trivially copyable. This patch
deletes the copy constructor in advance, to separate out the breakage.
Currently, the IRBuilder copy constructor is usually used by accident,
not by intention. In rG7c362b25d7a9 I've fixed a number of cases where
functions accepted IRBuilder rather than IRBuilder &, thus performing
an unnecessary copy. In rG5f7b92b1b4d6 I've fixed cases where an
IRBuilder was copied, while an InsertPointGuard should have been used
instead.
The only non-trivial use of the copy constructor is the
getIRBForDbgInsertion() helper, for which I separated construction and
setting of the insertion point in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74693
replaceDbgDeclare is used to update the descriptions of stack variables
when they are moved (e.g. by ASan or SafeStack). A side effect of
replaceDbgDeclare is that it moves dbg.declares around in the
instruction stream (typically by hoisting them into the entry block).
This behavior was introduced in llvm/r227544 to fix an assertion failure
(llvm.org/PR22386), but no longer appears to be necessary.
Hoisting a dbg.declare generally does not create problems. Usually,
dbg.declare either describes an argument or an alloca in the entry
block, and backends have special handling to emit locations for these.
In optimized builds, LowerDbgDeclare places dbg.values in the right
spots regardless of where the dbg.declare is. And no one uses
replaceDbgDeclare to handle things like VLAs.
However, there doesn't seem to be a positive case for moving
dbg.declares around anymore, and this reordering can get in the way of
understanding other bugs. I propose getting rid of it.
Testing: stage2 RelWithDebInfo sanitized build, check-llvm
rdar://59397340
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74517
Various parts of the LLVM code generator assume that the address
argument of a dbg.declare is not a `ptrtoint`-of-alloca. ASan breaks
this assumption, and this results in local variables sometimes being
unavailable at -O0.
GlobalISel, SelectionDAG, and FastISel all do not appear to expect
dbg.declares to have a `ptrtoint` as an operand. This means that they do
not place entry block allocas in the usual side table reserved for local
variables available in the whole function scope. This isn't always a
problem, as LLVM can try to lower the dbg.declare to a DBG_VALUE, but
those DBG_VALUEs can get dropped for all the usual reasons DBG_VALUEs
get dropped. In the ObjC test case I'm looking at, the cause happens to
be that `replaceDbgDeclare` has hoisted dbg.declares into the entry
block, causing LiveDebugValues to "kill" the DBG_VALUEs because the
lexical dominance check fails.
To address this, I propose:
1) Have ASan (always) pass an alloca to dbg.declares (this patch). This
is a narrow bugfix for -O0 debugging.
2) Make replaceDbgDeclare not move dbg.declares around. This should be a
generic improvement for optimized debug info, as it would prevent the
lexical dominance check in LiveDebugValues from killing as many
variables.
This means reverting llvm/r227544, which fixed an assertion failure
(llvm.org/PR22386) but no longer seems to be necessary. I was able to
complete a stage2 build with the revert in place.
rdar://54688991
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74369
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
We have to avoid using a GOT relocation to access the bias variable,
setting the hidden visibility achieves that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73529
Summary:
These instructions ignore parts of the input vectors which makes the
default MSan handling too strict and causes false positive reports.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, RKSimon, thakis
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73374
Patch by Chris Chrulski
When generating value profiling instrumentation, ensure the call gets the
correct funclet token, otherwise WinEHPrepare will turn the call (and all
subsequent instructions) into unreachable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73221
Patch by Chris Chrulski
This fixes a problem with the current behavior when assertions are enabled.
A loop that exits to a catchswitch instruction is skipped for the counter
promotion, however this check was being done after the PGOCounterPromoter
tried to collect an insertion point for the exit block. A call to
getFirstInsertionPt() on a block that begins with a catchswitch instruction
triggers an assertion. This change performs a check whether the counter
promotion is possible prior to collecting the ExitBlocks and InsertPts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73222
Summary:
This is a follow up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473#inline-647262.
There's a caveat here that `Align(1)` relies on the compiler understanding of `Log2_64` implementation to produce good code. One could use `Align()` as a replacement but I believe it is less clear that the alignment is one in that case.
Reviewers: xbolva00, courbet, bollu
Subscribers: arsenm, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, Jim, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73099
Juneyoung Lee