When suggesting "foo::bar" as a correction for "fob::bar" we mistakenly
replaced only "bar" with "foo::bar" producing "fob::foo::bar" which was broken.
This corrects that replacement in as many places as I could find & provides
test cases for all those cases I could find a test case for. There are a couple
that don't seem to be reachable (one looks entirely dead, the other just
doesn't seem to ever get called with a namespace to namespace change).
Review by Richard Smith ( http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D57 ).
llvm-svn: 165817
For 64-bit PowerPC SVR4, an aggregate containing only one
floating-point field (float, double, or long double) must be passed in
a register as though just that field were present. This patch
addresses the issue during Clang code generation by specifying in the
ABIArgInfo for the argument that the underlying type is passed
directly in a register. The included test case verifies flat and
nested structs for the three data types.
llvm-svn: 165816
PHIElimination inserts IMPLICIT_DEF instructions to guarantee that all
PHI predecessors have a live-out value. These IMPLICIT_DEF values are
not considered to be real interference when coalescing virtual
registers:
%vreg1 = IMPLICIT_DEF
%vreg2 = MOV32r0
When joining %vreg1 and %vreg2, the IMPLICIT_DEF instruction and its
value number should simply be erased since the %vreg2 value number now
provides a live-out value for the PHI predecesor block.
llvm-svn: 165813
This is a temporary hack until Bill's project to record command line options
in the LLVM IR is ready. Clang currently sets a default CPU but that isn't
recorded anywhere and it doesn't get used in the final LTO compilation.
llvm-svn: 165809
ConstString Host::GetVendorString();
ConstString Host::GetOSString();
comes from. It now all comes from the Host::GetArchitecture (eSystemDefaultArchitecture) like the Apple build was doing to minimize the number of places that need to be updated when Host::GetArchitecture () is called.
llvm-svn: 165805
On PowerPC, a bitcast of <16 x i8> to i128 may run through a code
path in ExpandRes_BITCAST that attempts to do an intermediate
bitcast to a <4 x i32> vector, and then construct the Hi and Lo parts
of the resulting i128 by pairing up two of those i32 vector elements
each. The code already recognizes that on a big-endian system, the
first two vector elements form the Hi part, and the final two vector
elements form the Lo part (vice-versa from the little-endian situation).
However, we also need to take endianness into account when forming each
of those separate pairs: on a big-endian system, vector element 0 is
the *high* part of the pair making up the Hi part of the result, and
vector element 1 is the low part of the pair. The code currently always
uses vector element 0 as the low part and vector element 1 as the high
part, as is appropriate for little-endian platforms only.
This patch fixes this by swapping the vector elements as they are
paired up as appropriate.
llvm-svn: 165802
DependenceAnalysis.cpp:1164:32: warning: implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from -5 to 3
[-Wconstant-conversion]
Result.DV[Level].Direction &= ~Dependence::DVEntry::GT;
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Patch from Preston Briggs <preston.briggs@gmail.com>.
llvm-svn: 165784
not legal. However, it should use a div instruction + mul + sub if divide is
legal. The rem legalization code was missing a check and incorrectly uses a
divrem libcall even when div is legal.
rdar://12481395
llvm-svn: 165778
The intent of this document is to be the go-to document for anybody who
wants to write new documentation, but isn't familiar with Sphinx.
llvm-svn: 165775
Somewhat troublingly, without this implemented, the check inside
isa_impl<> would silently use the parent's `classof()` when determining
whether it was okay to downcast from the parent to the child!
Bug analysis:
A build failure after removing the parent's `classof()` initially
alerted me to the bug, after which a little bit of thinking and reading
of the code identified the root cause.
The compiler could be made to prevent this bug from happening if there
were a way to ensure that in the code
template <typename To, typename From, typename Enabler = void>
struct isa_impl {
static inline bool doit(const From &Val) {
return To::classof(&Val);
}
};
that `To::classof` is actually inside the class `To`, and not in a base
class. I am not aware of a way to check this in C++. If there is a means
to perform that check, please bring it up on the list and this will be
fixed.
There is a high likelihood that there are other instances of this same
bug in the codebase.
llvm-svn: 165769
* Fix confusing explanation regarding abstract classes.
* Clarify auto-upcasting and why `Shape` doesn't need a `classof()`.
* Add section `Rules of Thumb` with some quick summary tips.
llvm-svn: 165768
Recent changes to isa<>/dyn_cast<> have made unnecessary those classof()
of the form:
static bool classof(const Foo *) { return true; }
Accordingly, remove mention of such classof() from the documentation.
llvm-svn: 165766
Additionally, all such cases are handled with no dynamic check.
All `classof()` of the form
class Foo {
[...]
static bool classof(const Bar *) { return true; }
[...]
}
where Foo is an ancestor of Bar are no longer necessary.
Don't write them!
Note: The exact test is `is_base_of<Foo, Bar>`, which is non-strict, so
that Foo is considered an ancestor of itself.
This leads to the following rule of thumb for LLVM-style RTTI:
The argument type of `classof()` should be a strict ancestor.
For more information about implementing LLVM-style RTTI, see
docs/HowToSetUpLLVMStyleRTTI.rst
llvm-svn: 165765
This classof() is effectively saying that a MachineCodeEmitter "is-a"
JITEmitter, but JITEmitter is in fact a descendant of
MachineCodeEmitter, so this is not semantically correct. Consequently,
none of the assertions that rely on these classof() actualy check
anything.
Remove the RTTI (which didn't actually check anything) and use
static_cast<> instead.
Post-Mortem Bug Analysis
========================
Cause of the bug
----------------
r55022 appears to be the source of the classof() and assertions removed
by this commit. It aimed at removing some dynamic_cast<> that were
solely in the assertions. A typical diff hunk from that commit looked
like:
- assert(dynamic_cast<JITEmitter*>(MCE) && "Unexpected MCE?");
- JITEmitter *JE = static_cast<JITEmitter*>(getCodeEmitter());
+ assert(isa<JITEmitter>(MCE) && "Unexpected MCE?");
+ JITEmitter *JE = cast<JITEmitter>(getCodeEmitter());
Hence, the source of the bug then seems to be an attempt to replace
dynamic_cast<> with LLVM-style RTTI without properly setting up the
class hierarchy for LLVM-style RTTI. The bug therefore appears to be
simply a "thinko".
What initially indicated the presence of the bug
------------------------------------------------
After implementing automatic upcasting for isa<>, classof() functions of
the form
static bool classof(const Foo *) { return true; }
were removed, since they only serve the purpose of optimizing
statically-OK upcasts. A subsequent recompilation triggered a build
failure on the isa<> tests within the removed asserts, since the
automatic upcasting (correctly) failed to substitute this classof().
Key to pinning down the root cause of the bug
---------------------------------------------
After being alerted to the presence of the bug, some thought about the
semantics which were being asserted by the buggy classof() revealed that
it was incorrect.
How the bug could have been prevented
-------------------------------------
This bug could have been prevented by better documentation for how to
set up LLVM-style RTTI. This should be solved by the recently added
documentation HowToSetUpLLVMStyleRTTI. However, this bug suggests that
the documentation should clearly explain the contract that classof()
must fulfill. The HowToSetUpLLVMStyleRTTI already explains this
contract, but it is a little tucked away. A future patch will expand
that explanation and make it more prominent.
There does not appear to be a simple way to have the compiler prevent
this bug, since fundamentally it boiled down to a spurious classof()
where the programmer made an erroneous statement about the conversion.
This suggests that perhaps the interface to LLVM-style RTTI of classof()
is not the best. There is already some evidence for this, since in a
number of places Clang has classof() forward to classofKind(Kind K)
which evaluates the cast in terms of just the Kind. This could probably
be generalized to simply a `static const Kind MyKind;` field in leaf
classes and `static const Kind firstMyKind, lastMyKind;` for non-leaf
classes, and have the rest of the work be done inside Casting.h,
assuming that the Kind enum is laid out in a preorder traversal of the
inheritance tree.
llvm-svn: 165764
David Blaikie