the type exists.
Fix up cases where we weren't checking for optional types and add
an assert to addType to make sure we catch this in the future.
Fix up a testcase that was using the tag for DW_TAG_array_type
when it meant DW_TAG_enumeration_type.
llvm-svn: 187963
No functionality change.
It should suffice to check the type of a debug info metadata, instead of
calling Verify. For cases where we know the type of a DI metadata, use
assert.
llvm-svn: 185249
a zero-argument createNullPtrType function for creating the canonical
nullptr type.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1050
llvm-svn: 185114
Representing enumerators by int64 instead of uint64 for now. At some
point we need to address the underlying issue of representation
depending on the specific enumeration.
llvm-svn: 184761
There were bits & pieces of code lying around that may've given the
impression that debug info metadata supported the possibility that a
subprogram's type could be specified by a non-subroutine type describing
the return type of a void function. This support was incomplete &
unnecessary. Asserts & API have been changed to make the desired usage
more clear.
llvm-svn: 182532
This resolves the last of the PR14606 failures in the GDB 7.5 test
suite by implementing an optional name field for
DW_TAG_imported_modules/DIImportedEntities and using that to implement
C++ namespace aliases (eg: "namespace X = Y;").
llvm-svn: 182328
This is only tested for global variables at the moment (& includes tests
for the unnamed parameter case, since apparently this entire function
was completely untested previously)
llvm-svn: 181632
DIBuilder::createImportedDeclaration isn't fully plumbed through (note,
lacking in AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug support) but this seemed like a
sufficiently useful division of code to make the subsequent patch(es)
easier to follow.
llvm-svn: 181364
This reverts commit r179840 with a fix to test/DebugInfo/two-cus-from-same-file.ll
I'm not sure why that test only failed on ARM & MIPS and not X86 Linux, even
though the debug info was clearly invalid on all of them, but this ought to fix
it.
llvm-svn: 179996
Adding another CU-wide list, in this case of imported_modules (since they
should be relatively rare, it seemed better to add a list where each element
had a "context" value, rather than add a (usually empty) list to every scope).
This takes care of DW_TAG_imported_module, but to fully address PR14606 we'll
need to expand this to cover DW_TAG_imported_declaration too.
llvm-svn: 179836
This reverts commit 342d92c7a0adeabc9ab00f3f0d88d739fe7da4c7.
Turns out we're going with a different schema design to represent
DW_TAG_imported_modules so we won't need this extra field.
llvm-svn: 178215
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
llvm-svn: 178099
Moving the DIFile parameter to immediately proceed the tag so that it will be a
common prefix with other DIScopes (once the DIFile is replaced with the raw
file/directory pair).
llvm-svn: 177492
This makes DIType's first non-tag parameter the same as DIFile's, allowing them
to both share the common implementation of getFilename/getDirectory in DIScope.
llvm-svn: 177467
This is another step along the way to making all DIScopes have a common prefix
which can be added to in a general manner to support using directives
(DW_TAG_imported_module).
llvm-svn: 177462
This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.
llvm-svn: 177239
This is the next step towards making the metadata for DIScopes have a common
prefix rather than having to delegate based on their tag type.
llvm-svn: 176913
Previously we seemed to be assuming that all functions were definitions and all
methods were declarations. This may be consistent with how Clang uses DIBuilder
but doesn't have to be true of all clients (such as DragonEgg).
llvm-svn: 175423
The main lists of debug info metadata attached to the compile_unit had an extra
layer of metadata nodes they went through for no apparent reason. This patch
removes that (& still passes just as much of the GDB 7.5 test suite). If anyone
can show evidence as to why these extra metadata nodes are there I'm open to
reverting this patch & documenting why they're there.
llvm-svn: 174266
This works fine with GDB for member variable pointers, but GDB's support for
member function pointers seems to be quite unrelated to
DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type. (see GDB bug 14998 for details)
llvm-svn: 171698
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
llvm-svn: 171359
David Blaikie