Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Philip Reames 3195500297 [GC] Consolidate all built in GCs into a single file [NFC]
Combine a bunch of small files into a single, still rather small, file.  The primary purpose of this is to get all of the static initializers into a single file so as to have a well defined order of initialization.  

llvm-svn: 258109
2016-01-19 03:57:18 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 6e98cd32dc CodeGen: Avoid more ilist iterator implicit conversions, NFC
llvm-svn: 249903
2015-10-09 21:08:19 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko f00654e31b Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)
Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.

llvm-svn: 240390
2015-06-23 09:49:53 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko 70bc5f1398 Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
  -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
  llvm/lib/


Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!

llvm-svn: 240137
2015-06-19 15:57:42 +00:00
David Majnemer 7fddeccb8b Move the personality function from LandingPadInst to Function
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.

This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
  personality routine.  This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
  first has an operand which produces no additional information.

- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
  LandingPadInst.  Moving the personality routine off of any one
  particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
  than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
  exceptional function.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429

llvm-svn: 239940
2015-06-17 20:52:32 +00:00
David Blaikie 4a2e73b066 [opaque pointer type] API migration for GEP constant factories
Require the pointee type to be passed explicitly and assert that it is
correct. For now it's possible to pass nullptr here (and I've done so in
a few places in this patch) but eventually that will be disallowed once
all clients have been updated or removed. It'll be a long road to get
all the way there... but if you have the cahnce to update your callers
to pass the type explicitly without depending on a pointer's element
type, that would be a good thing to do soon and a necessary thing to do
eventually.

llvm-svn: 233938
2015-04-02 18:55:32 +00:00
Yaron Keren 75e0c4b060 Remove superfluous .str() and replace std::string concatenation with Twine.
llvm-svn: 233392
2015-03-27 17:51:30 +00:00
David Blaikie 86ecb1bdaf [opaque pointer type] IRBuilder gep migration progress
llvm-svn: 232294
2015-03-15 01:03:19 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 71f308adb7 Re-sort #include lines using my handy dandy ./utils/sort_includes.py
script. This is in preparation for changes to lots of include lines.

llvm-svn: 229088
2015-02-13 09:09:03 +00:00
Philip Reames 23cf2e2f97 Remove gc.root's performCustomLowering
This is a refactoring to restructure the single user of performCustomLowering as a specific lowering pass and remove the custom lowering hook entirely.

Before this change, the LowerIntrinsics pass (note to self: rename!) was essentially acting as a pass manager, but without being structured in terms of passes. Instead, it proxied calls to a set of GCStrategies internally. This adds a lot of conceptual complexity (i.e. GCStrategies are stateful!) for very little benefit. Since there's been interest in keeping the ShadowStackGC working, I extracting it's custom lowering pass into a dedicated pass and just added that to the pass order. It will only run for functions which opt-in to that gc.

I wasn't able to find an easy way to preserve the runtime registration of custom lowering functionality. Given that no user of this exists that I'm aware of, I made the choice to just remove that. If someone really cares, we can look at restoring it via dynamic pass registration in the future.

Note that despite the large diff, none of the lowering code actual changes. I added the framing needed to make it a pass and rename the class, but that's it.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7218

llvm-svn: 227351
2015-01-28 19:28:03 +00:00