Summary:
There is no reason to guard `tuple_size`, `tuple_element` and `get<I>(...)` for pair and array inside of `<__tuple>` so that they are only available when we have variadic templates.
This requires there be redundant declarations and definitions. It also makes it easy to get things wrong.
For example the following code should compile (and does in c++11).
```
#define _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS
#include <array>
int main()
{
static_assert((std::tuple_size<std::array<int, 10> volatile>::value == 10), "");
}
```
This patch lifts the non-variadic parts of `tuple_size`, `tuple_types`, and `get<I>(...)` to the top of `<__tuple>` where they don't require variadic templates. This patch also removes `<__tuple_03>` because there is no longer a need for it.
Reviewers: danalbert, K-ballo, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7774
llvm-svn: 232492
Summary:
An evil user might overload operator comma. Use a void cast to make sure any user overload is not selected.
Modify all the test iterators to define operator comma.
Reviewers: danalbert, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5929
llvm-svn: 220706
trivial in C++03, thus making it trivial in both C++03 and C++11.
This patch allows one to opt-in/out of this decision with a macro. You can
choose to have the pair copy constructor always be trivial, or always be
non-trivial. The flag controlling this is now _LIBCPP_TRIVIAL_PAIR_COPY_CTOR.
The client can define this flag to 1, and the pair copy constructor will be
trivial (when possible of course), or to 0, and the pair copy constructor will
be nontrivial.
Default settings for this flag are set in <__config> (as usual). With this
commit the default is _LIBCPP_TRIVIAL_PAIR_COPY_CTOR=1 for all platforms
except __APPLE__, which defaults to _LIBCPP_TRIVIAL_PAIR_COPY_CTOR=0.
llvm-svn: 194742
pair, and a couple of pair-like implementation detail types. The
C++98/03 and 11 standards all specify that the copy constructor of
pair<int, int> is trivial. However as libc++ tracked the draft C++11
standard over the years, this copy constructor became non-trivial, and
then just recently was corrected back to trivial for C++11.
Unfortunately (for libc++1) the Itanium ABI specifies different calling
conventions for trivial and non-trivial copy constructors. Therefore
currently the C++03 libc++ copy constructor for pair<int, int> is ABI
incompatible with the C++11 libc++ copy constructor for pair<int, int>.
This is Bad(tm). This patch corrects the situation by making this copy
constructor trivial in C++03 mode as well.
Just in case it is needed for an incomplete C++11 compiler, libc++
retains the ability to support pair with rvalue references, but without
defaulted special members. However the pair needs non-trivial special
members to implement this special case, (as it did when clang was in
this place a couple of years ago).
During this work a bug was also found and fixed in
is_trivially_constructible.
And there is a minor drive-by fix in <__config> regarding
__type_visibility__.
A test is updated to ensure that the copy constructor of pair<int, int>
is trivial in both C++03 and C++11. This test will necessarily fail for
a compiler that implements rvalue references but not defaulted special
members.
llvm-svn: 194536
The patch touches these files:
locale
array
deque
new
string
utility
vector
__bit_reference
__split_buffer
locale_win32.h
There is no intended functionality change and it is expected that reversing the position of the inline keyword with regard to the other keywords does not change the meaning of anything, least not for apple/Linux etc.
It is intended to make libcxx more consistent with itself and to prevent the 1000 or so
"inline.cpp(3) : warning C4141: 'inline' : used more than once" warnings that MS's cl.exe compiler emits without this patch, i.e. if inline is not the first keyword before a function name etc.
Prefer "inline [other inline related keyword]" over "[other related keyword] inline".
After this patch, libcxx should be consistent to this pattern.
llvm-svn: 191987
Eric Fiselier