The patch reuses the common code to print memory operand addresses as
instruction comments. This helps to align the comments and enables using
target-specific comment markers when `evaluateMemoryOperandAddress()` is
implemented for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104861
This diff paves the way for {D102964} which adds a new kind of
InputSection.
We previously maintained section ordering implicitly: we created
InputSections as we parsed each file in command-line order, and passed
on this ordering when we created OutputSections and OutputSegments by
iterating over these InputSections. The implicitness of the ordering
made it difficult to refactor the code to e.g. handle a new type of
InputSection. As such, I've codified the ordering explicitly via
`inputOrder` fields. This also allows us to use `sort` instead of
`stable_sort`.
Benchmarking chromium_framework on my 3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W:
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.23 4.35 4.27 4.274 0.030157481
+ 20 4.24 4.38 4.27 4.2815 0.033759989
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102972
The Mach kernel & codesign on arm64 macOS has strict requirements for alignment and sequence of segments and sections. Dyld probably is just as picky, though kernel & codesign reject malformed Mach-O files before dyld ever has a chance.
I developed this diff by incrementally changing alignments & sequences to match the output of ld64. I stopped when my hello-world test program started working: `codesign --verify` succeded, and `execve(2)` didn't immediately fail with `errno == EBADMACHO` = `"Malformed Mach-O file"`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94935
Since there is no "weak lazy" lookup, function calls to weak symbols are
always non-lazily bound. We emit both regular non-lazy bindings as well
as weak bindings, in order that the weak bindings may overwrite the
non-lazy bindings if an appropriate symbol is found at runtime. However,
the bound addresses will still be written (non-lazily) into the
LazyPointerSection.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86573
Previously, we were only emitting regular bindings to weak
dynamic symbols; this diff adds support for the weak bindings too, which
can overwrite the regular bindings at runtime. We also treat weak
defined global symbols similarly -- since they can also be interposed at
runtime, they need to be treated as potentially dynamic symbols.
Note that weak bindings differ from regular bindings in that they do not
specify the dylib to do the lookup in (i.e. weak symbol lookup happens
in a flat namespace.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86572
Igor Kudrin