Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Igor Kudrin 657e067bb5 [ARMInstPrinter] Print the target address of a branch instruction
This follows other patches that changed printing immediate values of
branch instructions to target addresses, see D76580 (x86), D76591 (PPC),
D77853 (AArch64).

As observing immediate values might sometimes be useful, they are
printed as comments for branch instructions.

// llvm-objdump -d output (before)
000200b4 <_start>:
   200b4: ff ff ff fa   blx     #-4 <thumb>
000200b8 <thumb>:
   200b8: ff f7 fc ef   blx     #-8 <_start>

// llvm-objdump -d output (after)
000200b4 <_start>:
   200b4: ff ff ff fa   blx     0x200b8 <thumb>         @ imm = #-4
000200b8 <thumb>:
   200b8: ff f7 fc ef   blx     0x200b4 <_start>        @ imm = #-8

// GNU objdump -d.
000200b4 <_start>:
   200b4:       faffffff        blx     200b8 <thumb>
000200b8 <thumb>:
   200b8:       f7ff effc       blx     200b4 <_start>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104701
2021-06-30 16:35:28 +07:00
Oliver Stannard aac056c528 [objdump][ARM] Use correct offset when printing ARM/Thumb branch targets
llvm-objdump only uses one MCInstrAnalysis object, so if ARM and Thumb
code is mixed in one object, or if an object is disassembled without
explicitly setting the triple to match the ISA used, then branch and
call targets will be printed incorrectly.

This could be fixed by creating two MCInstrAnalysis objects in
llvm-objdump, like we currently do for SubtargetInfo. However, I don't
think there's any reason we need two separate sub-classes of
MCInstrAnalysis, so instead these can be merged into one, and the ISA
determined by checking the opcode of the instruction.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97766
2021-03-04 11:15:57 +00:00
Fangrui Song 71e2ca6e32 [llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:`
The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier.

`.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive.
Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section`
line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail.

```
Disassembly of section .foo:

0000000000001634 .foo:
```

Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right"

Reviewed By: rupprecht

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-05 18:05:28 -08:00
Peter Smith 2cafd872fb [ELF][ARM] Add a test that maxes out the thunk convergence limit
Add a test that takes the maximum amount of passes permitted to converge.
This will make sure that any symbol defined in a linker script gets the
correct value and that any other convergence limit involving symbol address
doesn't restrict Thunk convergence.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66346

llvm-svn: 369246
2019-08-19 09:46:52 +00:00