Previously the code for handling G_SMULO didn't properly check for the signed
multiply overflow, instead treating it the same as the unsigned G_UMULO.
Fixes PR35800.
llvm-svn: 321690
Previously, we would:
* compute the type of the conversion function and static invoker as a
side-effect of template argument deduction for a conversion
* re-compute the type as part of deduced return type deduction when building
the conversion function itself
Neither of these turns out to be quite correct. There are other ways to reach a
declaration of the conversion function than in a conversion (such as an
explicit call or friend declaration), and performing auto deduction causes the
function type to be rebuilt in the context of the lambda closure type (which is
different from the context in which it originally appeared, resulting in
spurious substitution failures for constructs that are valid in one context but
not the other, such as the use of an enclosing class's "this" pointer).
This patch switches us to use a different strategy: as before, we use the
declared type of the operator() to form the type of the conversion function and
invoker, but we now populate that type as part of return type deduction for the
conversion function. And the invoker is now treated as simply being an
implementation detail of building the conversion function, and isn't given
special treatment by template argument deduction for the conversion function
any more.
llvm-svn: 321683
This addresses an issue introduced in r183451: since
`removePiecesWithInvalidLocations` is called *after* `adjustCallLocations`,
it is not necessary, and in fact harmful, to have this assertion in
adjustCallLocations.
Addresses rdar://36170689
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41680
llvm-svn: 321682
I have no clue how this was missed when symbol table support was added. This
change ensures that the visibility of symbols is preserved by default.
llvm-svn: 321681
Initial working version of libunwind for PowerPC 64. Tested on
little-endian ppc64 host only.
Based on the existing PowerPC 32 code.
It supports:
- context save/restore (unw_getcontext, unw_init_local, unw_resume)
- read/write from/to saved registers
- backtrace (unw_step)
Patch by Leandro Lupori!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41386
Now builds with LIBUNWIND_ENABLE_CROSS_UNWINDING=ON should
work.
llvm-svn: 321680
For builds that only target one architecture, this was required to
be an exact match, while it previously required the allocation to be
strictly larger than the largest concrete one. Requiring it to be
larger than on equal should be enough.
This makes it more straightforward to update _LIBUNWIND_CONTEXT_SIZE
and _LIBUNWIND_CURSOR_SIZE.
llvm-svn: 321679
Summary:
This way new asan_device_setup, which knows about the quirks of
recent releases of Android, can be used with older ASan runtime
library (say, from an NDK release). The library is version locked to
the compiler, and is often hard or impossible to update.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41679
llvm-svn: 321677
This patch enables OMPT by default if version 50 or later is built and the config says, that OMPT will be supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41508
llvm-svn: 321675
- Fix formatting issue due to hyphenated terms at line breaks.
- Fix typo
This patch was made by Craig Flores
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41520
llvm-svn: 321671
- Fix incorrect wording in various intrinsic descriptions. Previously the descriptions used "low-order" and "high-order" when the intended meaning was "even-indexed" and "odd-indexed".
This patch was made by Craig Flores
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41518
llvm-svn: 321670
- Fixed innaccurate instruction mappings for various intrinsics.
- Fixed description of NaN handling in comparison intrinsics.
- Unify description of _mm_store_pd1 to match _mm_store1_pd.
- Fix incorrect wording in various intrinsic descriptions. Previously the descriptions used "low-order" and "high-order" when the intended meaning was "even-indexed" and "odd-indexed".
- Fix typos.
- Add missing italics command (\a) for params and fixed some parameter spellings.
This patch was made by Craig Flores
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41516
llvm-svn: 321669
Initial working version of libunwind for PowerPC 64. Tested on
little-endian ppc64 host only.
Based on the existing PowerPC 32 code.
It supports:
- context save/restore (unw_getcontext, unw_init_local, unw_resume)
- read/write from/to saved registers
- backtrace (unw_step)
Patch by Leandro Lupori!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41386
llvm-svn: 321667
The way to fix an undefined-template warning is to add lines to the header file that defines the template pattern. We should suppress the warnings when the template pattern is in a system header because we don't expect users to edit those.
llvm-svn: 321665
A call may have an intrinsic name but not have a valid intrinsic ID,
for example with llvm.invariant.group.barrier. If so, treat it as a
normal call like FastISel does.
llvm-svn: 321662
Some systems still don't have this module which was introduced in
version 2.0 (CentOS 7, sigh).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41611
llvm-svn: 321659
We normally want to ignore SHT_NOBITS sections when computing
offsets. The sh_offset of section itself seems to be irrelevant and
- If the section is in the middle of a PT_LOAD, it will make no
difference on the computed offset of the followup section.
- If it is in the end of a PT_LOAD, we want to avoid its alignment
changing the offset of the followup sections.
The issue is if it is at the start of the PT_LOAD. In that case we do
have to align it so that the following sections have congruent address
and offset module the page size. We were not handling this case.
This should fix freebsd kernel link.
llvm-svn: 321657
This is an extension of D31156 with the goal that we'll allow memcmp() == 0 expansion
for x86 to use 2 pairs of loads per block.
The memcmp expansion pass (formerly part of CGP) will generate this kind of pattern
with oversized integer compares, so we want to transform these into x86-specific vector
nodes before legalization splits things into scalar chunks.
See PR33325 for more details:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33325
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41618
llvm-svn: 321656
Tests updated to explicitly use fast-isel at -O0 instead of implicitly.
This change also allows an explicit -fast-isel option to override an
implicitly enabled global-isel. Otherwise -fast-isel would have no effect at -O0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41362
llvm-svn: 321655
Summary:
We are incorrectly updating the LI when loop-simplify generates
dedicated exit blocks for a loop. The issue is that there's an implicit
assumption that the Preds passed into UpdateAnalysisInformation are
reachable. However, this is not true and breaks LI by incorrectly
updating the header of a loop.
One such case is when we generate dedicated exits when the exit block is
a landing pad (through SplitLandingPadPredecessors). There maybe other
cases as well, since we do not guarantee that Preds passed in are
reachable basic blocks.
The added test case shows how loop-simplify breaks LI for the outer loop (and DT in turn)
after we try to generate the LoopSimplifyForm.
Reviewers: davide, chandlerc, sanjoy
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41519
llvm-svn: 321653
Our internal testing has revealed has discovered bugs in PPC builds.
I have forward reproduction instructions to the original author (Nirav).
llvm-svn: 321649
Summary:
isReg() in AArch64AsmParser.cpp is a bit of a misnomer, and would be better named 'isScalarReg()' instead.
Patch [1/3] in a series to add operand constraint checks for SVE's predicated ADD/SUB.
Reviewers: rengolin, mcrosier, evandro, fhahn, echristo
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41445
llvm-svn: 321646
Summary:
The C++ Itanium ABI says:
No cookie is required if the new operator being used is ::operator new[](size_t, void*).
We should only avoid poisoning the cookie if we're calling this
operator, not others. This is dealt with before the call to
InitializeArrayCookie.
Reviewers: rjmccall, kcc, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41301
llvm-svn: 321645
Amara Emerson