Adding a check to restrict system includes to a whitelist. Given a list
of includes that are explicitly allowed, the check issues a fixit to
remove any system include not on that list from the source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43778
llvm-svn: 332125
When bundle/unbundle intermediate files for HIP, there may be multiple
sub archs, therefore BoundArch needs to be included in the target
and output file names for clang-offload-bundler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46473
llvm-svn: 332121
ExtendSetCCUses updates SETCC nodes which use a load (OriginalLoad) to
reflect a simplification to the load (ExtLoad).
Based on my reading, ExtendSetCCUses may create new nodes to extend a
constant attached to a SETCC. It also creates fresh SETCC nodes which
refer to any updated operands.
ISTM that the location applied to the new constant and SETCC nodes
should be the same as the location of the ExtLoad.
This was suggested by Adrian in https://reviews.llvm.org/D45995.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46216
llvm-svn: 332119
This teaches tryToFoldExtOfLoad to set the right location on a
newly-created extload. With that in place, the logic for performing a
certain ([s|z]ext (load ...)) combine becomes identical for sexts and
zexts, and we can get rid of one copy of the logic.
The test case churn is due to dependencies on IROrders inherited from
the wrong SDLoc.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46158
llvm-svn: 332118
Part of the logic for combining (zext (load ...)) and (sext (load ...))
is duplicated. This creates problems because bugs in one version have to
be fixed again in the other version.
To address this, as a first step, I've extracted the duplicate logic
into a helper. I'll fix the debug location bug in the helper and
eliminate the copy of its logic in a followup.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46157
llvm-svn: 332117
Summary:
Multiple threads could be calling into DoLoadImage concurrently,
only one should be allowed to create the UtilityFunction.
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46733
llvm-svn: 332115
Inside Xcode and in Xcode toolchains LLDB is always in lockstep
with the Swift compiler, so it can reuse its Clang resource
directory. This allows LLDB and the Swift compiler to share the
same Clang module cache.
rdar://problem/40039633
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46736
llvm-svn: 332111
These directives allow the 'C' (compressed) extension to be enabled/disabled
within a single file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45864
Patch by Kito Cheng
llvm-svn: 332107
If the sprintf function is static (as on mingw-w64, where many stdio
functions are static inline wrappers), earlier optimization passes
could optimize out the return value altogether, and make it void,
which could break optimizations of this libcall that touch the
return value.
This fixes the issue discussed in PR37408 for the sprintf function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46752
llvm-svn: 332106
Summary:
performPostLD1Combine in AArch64ISelLowering looks for vector
insert_vector_elt of a loaded value which it can optimize into a single
LD1LANE instruction. The code checking for the pattern was not checking
if the lane index was a constant which could cause two problems:
- an assert when lowering the LD1LANE ISD node since it assumes an
constant operand
- an assert in isel if the lane index value depends on the
post-incremented base register
Both of these issues are avoided by simply checking that the lane index
is a constant.
Fixes bug 35822.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, javed.absar
Subscribers: rengolin, kristof.beyls, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46591
llvm-svn: 332103
Phi nodes can reside in live blocks but one of their incoming
arguments can come from a dead block. Dead blocks and reassociate
don't play nice together. In fact, reassociate performs an RPO
as a first step to avoid processing dead blocks.
The reason why Reassociate might not fixpoint when examining
dead blocks is that the following:
%xor0 = xor i16 %xor1, undef
%xor1 = xor i16 %xor0, undef
is perfectly valid LLVM IR (if it appears in a dead block),
so the worklist algorithm keeps pushing the two instructions for
reexamination. Note that this is not Reassociate fault, at least
not entirely. It's llvm that has a weird definition of dominance.
Fixes PR37390.
llvm-svn: 332100
Confirmed by both Agner and Intel's AOM - the IEC/FPC are not required for pure load/stores (even if its a partial update).
Can't fix WriteStore until all RMW instructions are cleaned up though....
llvm-svn: 332096
In Windows version 1803, the first instruction of ntdll!strchr is:
8a01 mov al,byte ptr [rcx]
This is the only needed change for this version as far as I can tell.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46458
llvm-svn: 332095
Summary:
This change reworks the handling of atomic memcpy within the instcombine pass.
Previously, a constant length atomic memcpy would be lowered into loads & stores
as long as no more than 16 load/store pairs are created. This is quite different
from the lowering done for a non-atomic memcpy; which only ever lowers into a single
load/store pair of no more than 8 bytes. Larger constant-sized memcpy calls are
expanded to load/stores in later passes, such as SelectionDAG lowering.
In this change the behaviour for atomic memcpy is unified with non-atomic memcpy;
atomic memcpy is now treated in the same was as non-atomic memcpy has always been.
We leave it to later passes to lower longer-length atomic memcpy calls.
Due to the structure of the pass's handling of memtransfer intrinsics, this change
also gives us handling of atomic memmove that we did not previously have.
Reviewers: apilipenko, skatkov, mkazantsev, anna, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46658
llvm-svn: 332093
This appears to be a copy/paste artifact from `AddrIsInHighMem`. It was caught by Firefox's jit-tests on Win64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46291
llvm-svn: 332092
Summary:
now that llvm supports host-agnostic path manipulation functions (and
most of their kinks have been ironed out), we can remove our copies of
the path parsing functions in favour of the llvm ones.
This should be NFC except for the slight difference in handling of the
"//" path, which is now normalized to "/" (this only applies to the
literal "//" path; "//net" and friends still get to keep the two
slashes).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46687
llvm-svn: 332088
losesInfo would be left unset when no conversion needs to be done. A
caller such as InstCombine's fitsInFPType would then branch on an
uninitialized value.
Caught using valgrind on an out-of-tree target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46645
llvm-svn: 332087
Summary: Fix two typos which result in verifying wrong data structures (DT) instead of PDT in DominatorTreeBatchUpdatesTest.
Reviewers: davide, kuhar, grosser, dberlin
Reviewed By: davide, kuhar, dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46696
llvm-svn: 332086
This diff adds support for -remove-section to llvm-strip.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46567
llvm-svn: 332081
Verify that the input binary is not getting modified
and add an invocation which uses -remove-section instead of -R.
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 332078
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34897 demonstrates an incorrect
coroutine frame allocation elision in the coro-elide pass. The elision
is performed on the basis that the SSA variables from all llvm.coro.begin
are directly referenced in subsequent llvm.coro.destroy instructions.
However, this ignores the fact that the function may exit through paths
that do not run these destroy instructions. In the sample program from
PR34897, for example, the llvm.coro.destroy instruction is only
executed in exception handling code. When the coroutine function exits
normally, llvm.coro.destroy is not called. Eliding the allocation in
this case causes a subsequent reference to the coroutine handle from
outside of the function to access freed memory.
To fix the issue, when finding an llvm.coro.destroy for each llvm.coro.begin,
only consider llvm.coro.destroy that are executed along non-exceptional paths.
Test Plan:
1. Download the sample program from
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34897, compile it with
`clang++ -fcoroutines-ts -stdlib=libc++ -std=c++1z -O2`, and run it.
It should print `"run1\ncheck1\nrun2\ncheck2"` and then exit
successfully.
2. Compile https://godbolt.org/g/mCKfnr and confirm it is still
optimized to a single instruction, 'return 1190'.
3. `check-llvm`
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: andrewrk, lewissbaker, EricWF, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43242
llvm-svn: 332077
For 'x::template y', consistently give a "no member named 'y' in 'x'"
diagnostic if there is no such member, and give a 'template keyword not
followed by a template' name error if there is such a member but it's not a
template. In the latter case, add a note pointing at the non-template.
Don't suggest inserting a 'template' keyword in 'X::Y<' if X is dependent
if the lookup of X::Y was actually not a dependent lookup and found only
non-templates.
llvm-svn: 332076
Summary:
Add documentation for the LLVM Support functions `openFileForWrite` and
`openFileForRead`. The `openFileForRead` parameter `RealPath`, in
particular, I think warranted some explanation.
In addition, make the behavior of the functions more consistent across
platforms. Prior to this patch, Windows would set or not set the result
file descriptor based on the nature of the error, whereas Unix would
consistently set it to `-1` if the open failed. Make Windows
consistently set it to `-1` as well.
Test Plan:
1. `ninja check-llvm`
2. `ninja docs-llvm-html`
Reviewers: zturner, rnk, danielmartin, scanon
Reviewed By: danielmartin, scanon
Subscribers: scanon, danielmartin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46499
llvm-svn: 332075
Adrian Prantl