explicit functions that are not candidates.
It's not always obvious that the reason a conversion was not possible is
because the function you wanted to call is 'explicit', so explicitly say
if that's the case.
It would be nice to rank the explicit candidates higher in the
diagnostic if an implicit conversion sequence exists for their
arguments, but unfortunately we can't determine that without potentially
triggering non-immediate-context errors that we're not permitted to
produce.
We need to eagerly instantiate constexpr functions used in them even if
the default argument is never actually used, because we might evaluate
portions of it when performing semantic checks.
llvm-svn: 361670
If function parameters have default values, and that of the second
parameter is parsed with errors, function declaration would have
a parameter without default value that follows a parameter with
that. Such declaration breaks logic of selecting overloaded
function. As a solution, put opaque object as default value in such case.
This patch fixes PR20055.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4378
llvm-svn: 213594
Combined with typo correction's new ability to apply global/absolute nested
name specifiers to possible corrections, cases such as in PR12287 where the
desired function is being shadowed by a lexically closer function with the
same name but a different number of parameters will now include a FixIt.
On a side note, since the test for this change caused
test/SemaCXX/typo-correction.cpp to exceed the typo correction limit for
a single file, I've included a test case for exceeding the limit and added
some comments to both the original and part two of typo-correction.cpp
warning future editors of the files about the limit.
llvm-svn: 185881
method parameter, provide a note pointing at the parameter itself so
the user does not have to manually look for the function/method being
called and match up parameters to arguments. For example, we now get:
t.c:4:5: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to
parameter of
type 'int *' [-pedantic]
f(long_ptr);
^~~~~~~~
t.c:1:13: note: passing argument to parameter 'x' here
void f(int *x);
^
llvm-svn: 102038
InitializationSequence. Specially, switch initialization of a C++
class type (either copy- or direct-initialization).
Also, make sure that we create an elidable copy-construction when
performing copy initialization of a C++ class variable. Fixes PR5826.
llvm-svn: 91750
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
semantics and improve our handling of default arguments. Specifically,
we follow this order:
- As soon as the see the '}' in the class definition, the class is
complete and we add any implicit declarations (default constructor,
copy constructor, etc.) to the class.
- If there are any default function arguments, parse them
- If there were any inline member function definitions, parse them
As part of this change, we now keep track of the the fact that we've
seen unparsed default function arguments within the AST. See the new
ParmVarDecl::hasUnparsedDefaultArg member. This allows us to properly
cope with calls inside default function arguments to other functions
where we're making use of the default arguments.
Made some C++ error messages regarding failed initializations more
specific.
llvm-svn: 61406
Richard Smith