If an address_space attribute is defined in a macro, print the macro instead
when diagnosing a warning or error for incompatible pointers with different
address_spaces.
We allow this for all attributes (not just address_space), and for multiple
attributes declared in the same macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51329
llvm-svn: 359826
Compiling the following causes clang to crash
```
char *cmp(__attribute__((address_space(1))) char *x, __attribute__((address_space(2))) char *y) {
return x < y ? x : y;
}
```
with the message: "wrong cast for pointers in different address
spaces(must be an address space cast)!"
This is because during IR emission, the source and dest type for a
bitcast should not have differing address spaces.
This fix prints an error since the code shouldn't compile in the first place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50278
llvm-svn: 339167
Summary:
The comment with the OpenCL clause about this clearly
says: "No type shall be qualified by qualifiers for
two or more different address spaces."
This must mean that two or more qualifiers for the
_same_ address space is allowed. However, it is
likely unintended by the programmer, so emit a
warning.
For dependent address space types, reject them like
before since we cannot know what the address space
will be.
Patch by Bevin Hansson (ebevhan).
Reviewers: Anastasia
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: bader, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47630
llvm-svn: 335103
For OpenCL, the private address space qualifier is 0 in AST. Before this change, 0 address space qualifier
is always mapped to target address space 0. As now target private address space is specified by
alloca address space in data layout, address space qualifier 0 needs to be mapped to alloca addr space specified by the data layout.
This change has no impact on targets whose alloca addr space is 0.
With contributions from Matt Arsenault, Tony Tye and Wen-Heng (Jack) Chung
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31404
llvm-svn: 299965
This patch implements __unaligned (MS extension) as a proper type qualifier
(before that, it was implemented as an ignored attribute).
It also fixes PR27367 and PR27666.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20103
llvm-svn: 269220
This patch implements __unaligned (MS extension) as a proper type qualifier
(before that, it was implemented as an ignored attribute).
It also fixes PR27367.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19654
llvm-svn: 268727
This patch implements __unaligned as a type qualifier; before that, it was
modeled as an attribute. Proper mangling of __unaligned is implemented as well.
Some OpenCL code/tests are tangenially affected, as they relied on existing
number and sizes of type qualifiers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18596
llvm-svn: 266415
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Type hierarchy. Demote 'volatile' to extended-qualifier status. Audit our
use of qualifiers and fix a few places that weren't dealing with qualifiers
quite right; many more remain.
llvm-svn: 82705
in C89 mode. This makes it enabled by default instead of only enabled with
-pedantic. Clang defaults to c99 mode, so people will see this more often
than with GCC, but they can always use -std=c89 if they really want c89.
llvm-svn: 65647
An address space name cannot be used to qualify an object that has automatic
storage duration. Still not catching ASQual'd allocas of array type, just
scalars at the moment.
llvm-svn: 48350
Alexey Bader