At this point, every supported compiler that claims a -std=c++17 mode
should also support `if constexpr`. This was an issue for GCC 5
and GCC 6, but hasn't been an issue since GCC 7. (Our current
minimum supported GCC version, IIUC, is GCC 10 or 11.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113348
This changes adds the pipeline config for both 32-bit and 64-bit AIX targets. As well, we add a lit feature `LIBCXX-AIX-FIXME` which is used to mark the failing tests which remain to be investigated on AIX, so that the CI produces a clean build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111359
Make test_allocator etc. constexpr-friendly so they can be used to test constexpr string and possibly constexpr vector
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110994
Before this patch, `try_acquire` blocks instead of returning false.
This is because `__libcpp_thread_poll_with_backoff` interprets zero
as meaning infinite, causing `try_acquire` to wait indefinitely.
Thanks to Pablo Busse (pabusse) for the patch!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98334
These tests don't fail when only windows-dll is set in mingw mode, as the
bug is specific to MSVC mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112348
When wide characters are supported libc++ manually translates a
`narrow non-breaking space` and a `non-breaking space` to a space.
This behaviour wasn't available when wide characters were disabled.
This enables an emulation for that configuration.
Updating the libc++ Docker image to Ubuntu Focal caused some breakage.
This was temporary disabled in D112737. This re-enables four of these
tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113133
These can't be made constexpr-constructible (constinit'able),
so they aren't C++20-conforming. Also, the platform versions are
going to be bigger than the atomic/futex version, so we'd have
the awkward situation that `semaphore<42>` could be bigger than
`semaphore<43>`, and that's just silly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110110
These are not standard methods, neither libstdc++ nor MSVC STL provide
them.
In practice, one of them was untested and the other one was only used in
one single test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113027
Testing the unsupported pattern can trigger the invalid parameter handler,
which depending on CRT configuration can abort the process.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112352
There's a nuanced check about when to use suffixes on these integer
non-type-template-parameters, but when rebuilding names for
-gsimple-template-names there isn't enough data in the DWARF to
determine when to use suffixes or not. So turn on suffixes always to
make it easy to match up names in llvm-dwarfdump --verify.
I /think/ if we correctly modelled auto non-type-template parameters
maybe we could put suffixes only on those. But there's also some logic
in Clang that puts the suffixes on overloaded functions - at least
that's what the parameter says (see D77598 and printTemplateArguments
"TemplOverloaded" parameter) - but I think maybe it's for anything that
/can/ be overloaded, not necessarily only the things that are overloaded
(the argument value is hardcoded at the various callsites, doesn't seem
to depend on overload resolution/searching for overloaded functions). So
maybe with "auto" modeled more accurately, and differentiating between
function templates (always using type suffixes there) and class/variable
templates (only using the suffix for "auto" types) we could correctly
use integer type suffixes only in the minimal set of cases.
But that seems all too much fuss, so let's just put integer type
suffixes everywhere always in the debug info of integer non-type
template parameters in template names.
(more context:
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D77598#inline-1057607
* https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/ekLMllbLIZg/m/-dhJ0hO1AAAJ )
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111477
Those tests would pass when run on a C Standard Library that actually
provides wide characters, but fail when run on top of one that doesn't.
It's really difficult to test this 100% perfectly in the CI without
introducing an actual platform that doesn't provide these declarations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112937
Since we no longer officially support Clang 11 remove the work-arounds
for this version.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112727
`libc++` has had the guarantee of the default constructor of `tuple<>` being
trivial since 405570dc7a. Now, the
standard mandates it as of LWG3211. So, move the file out of
`libcxx/test/libcxx` and into `libcxx/test/std` since it's no longer
`libc++`-specific. Rename it to be `.compile.pass.cpp` instead of
`.pass.cpp` while we're at it.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112743
After recent changes to the Docker image, all hell broke loose and the
CI started failing. This patch marks a few tests as unsupported until
we can figure out what the issues are and fix them.
In the future, it would be ideal if the nodes could pick up the Dockerfile
present in the revision being tested, which would allow us to test changes
to the Dockerfile in the CI, like we do for all other code changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112737
`is_error_condition_enum_v` and `is_error_code_enum_v` are currently of
type `size_t`, but the standard mandates they are of type `bool`.
This is an ABI break technically since the size of these variable
templates has changed. Document it as such in the release notes.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50755
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112553
Add deduction guides to `valarray` and `scoped_allocator_adaptor`. This largely
finishes implementation of the paper:
* deduction guides for other classes mentioned in the paper were
implemented previously (see the list below);
* deduction guides for several classes contained in the proposal
(`reference_wrapper`, `lock_guard`, `scoped_lock`, `unique_lock`,
`shared_lock`) were removed by [LWG2981](https://wg21.link/LWG2981).
Also add deduction guides to the synopsis for the few classes (e.g. `pair`)
where they were missing.
The only part of the paper that isn't fully implemented after this patch is
making sure certain deduction guides don't participate in overload resolution
when given incorrect template parameters.
List of significant commits implementing the other parts of P0433 (omitting some
minor fixes):
* [pair](af65856eec)
* [basic_string](6d9f750dec)
* [array](0ca8c0895c)
* [deque](dbb6f8a817)
* [forward_list](e076700b77)
* [list](4a227e582b)
* [vector](df8f754792)
* [queue/stack/priority_queue](5b8b8b5dce)
* [basic_regex](edd5e29cfe)
* [optional](f35b4bc395)
* [map/multimap](edfe8525de)
* [set/multiset](e20865c387)
* [unordered_set/unordered_multiset](296a80102a)
* [unordered_map/unordered_multimap](dfcd4384cb)
* [function](e1eabcdfad)
* [tuple](1308011e1b)
* [shared_ptr/weak_ptr](83564056d4)
Additional notes:
* It was revision 2 of the paper that was voted into the Standard.
P0433R3 is a separate paper that is not part of the Standard.
* The paper also mandates removing several `make_*_searcher` functions
(e.g. `make_boyer_moore_searcher`) which are currently not implemented
(except in `experimental/`).
* The `__cpp_lib_deduction_guides` feature test macro from the paper was
accidentally omitted from the Standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112510
The type `MoveOnlyForwardRange` violates the precondition stated in
`view.interface.general`. Specifically, the type passed to
`view_interface` shall model the `view` concept. In turn, this requires the
type to satisfy `movable` concept (and others), but this type
`MoveOnlyForwardRange` does not satisfy the `movable` concept.
Add a move assignment operator so that `MoveOnlyForwardRange` satisfies the
`movable` concept. While we're here, ensure the neighboring types that inherit
from `view_interface` also satisfy the `view` concept to avoid similar issues.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50720
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112631
Mark LWG2731 as complete. The type alias `mutex_type` is only provided if
`scoped_lock` is given one mutex type and it has been implemented that
way since the beginning of Clang 5 it seems. There already are tests for
verifying existence (and lack thereof) for `mutex_type` type alias
depending on the number of mutex types, so there is nothing to
do for this LWG issue.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112462
Also fix a few places in the `shared_ptr` implementation where
`element_type` was passed to the `__is_compatible` helper. This could
result in `remove_extent` being applied twice to the pointer's template
type (first by the definition of `element_type` and then by the helper),
potentially leading to somewhat less readable error messages for some
incorrect code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112092
This test doesn't fail in mingw mode (which uses the same Itanium
name mangling and ABI as other platforms).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112210
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<vector>`.
I now added tests for the current offending cases. I wonder whether it
would be better to add one addressof test per directory and test all
possible violations. Also to guard against possible future errors?
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111961
According to the standard [vector.capacity]/5, std::vector<T>::reserve
shall throw an exception of type std::length_error when the requested
capacity exceeds max_size().
This behavior is not implemented correctly: the function 'reserve'
simply propagates the exception from allocator<T>::allocate. Before
D110846 that exception used to be of type std::length_error (which is
correct for vector<T>::reserve, but incorrect for
allocator<T>::allocate).
This patch fixes the issue and adds regression tests.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112068
std::vector<bool> rebinds the supplied allocator to construct objects
of type '__storage_type' rather than 'bool'. Allocators are allowed to
use explicit conversion constructors, so care must be taken when
performing conversions.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112150
Those creep up from time to time. We need to use `int main(int, char**)`
because in freestanding mode, `main` doesn't get special treatment and
special mangling, so we setup a symbol alias from the mangled version of
`main(int, char**)` to `extern "C" main`. That only works if all the tests
are consistent about how they define their main function.
Mark LWG3573 as complete. It involves a change in wording around when
`basic_string_view`'s constructor for iterator/sentinel can throw. The
current implementation is not marked conditionally `noexcept`, so there
is nothing to do here. Add a test that binds this behavior to verify the
constructor is not marked `noexcept(true)` when `end - begin` throws.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111925
The only possible kind of a conversion in initialization of a shared
pointer to an array is a qualification conversion (i.e., adding
cv-qualifiers). This patch adds tests for converting from `A[]` to
`const A[]` to the following functions:
```
template<class Y> explicit shared_ptr(Y* p);
template<class Y> shared_ptr(const shared_ptr<Y>& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr(shared_ptr<Y>&& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr& operator=(const shared_ptr<Y>& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr& operator=(shared_ptr<Y>&& r);
template<class Y> void reset(Y* p);
template<class Y, class D> void reset(Y* p, D d);
template<class Y, class D, class A> void reset(Y* p, D d, A a);
```
Similar tests for converting functions that involve a `weak_ptr` should
be added once LWG issue [3001](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3001)
is implemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112048
Currently the member functions std::allocator<T>::allocate,
std::experimental::pmr::polymorphic_allocator::allocate and
std::resource_adaptor<T>::do_allocate throw an exception of type
std::length_error when the requested size exceeds the maximum size.
According to the C++ standard ([allocator.members]/4,
[mem.poly.allocator.mem]/1), std::allocator<T>::allocate and
std::pmr::polymorphic_allocator::allocate must throw a
std::bad_array_new_length exception in this case.
The patch fixes the issue with std::allocator<T>::allocate and changes
the type the exception thrown by
std::experimental::pmr::resource_adaptor<T>::do_allocate to
std::bad_array_new_length as well for consistency.
The patch resolves LWG 3237, LWG 3038 and LWG 3190.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110846
This initial change adds the AIX configuration to run-buildbot, an AIX
CMake cache file, and appropriate compiler and linker flags for testing
AIX to the lit "from scratch" configuration files. Either of the 32-bit or 64-bit configurations
can be built by setting `OBJECT_MODE` in the build environment (as is
typical for AIX).
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111244
Implement LWG3480 which enables `directory_iterator` and
`recursive_directory_iterator` to be both a `borrowed_range` and a
`view`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111644
MSVC targets also have a 64 bit long double, as do MinGW targets on ARM.
This hasn't been noticed in CI because the MSVC configurations there run
with _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INT128 defined.
This avoids assuming that either __int128_t or double is equal in size to
long double. i386 MinGW targets have sizeof(long double) == 10, which
doesn't match any of the tested types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111671
Mark LWG3274 as complete. The feature test macro `__cpp_lib_span` was added in
`6d2599e4f776d0cd88438cb82a00c4fc25cc3f67`.
https://wg21.link/p1024 mentions marking `span:::empty()` with
`[[nodiscard]]` which is not done yet. So, do that and add tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111516
Fixes the tests added in D110852 for the debug iterators.
Similar issues with hijacking `operator&` still exist, they will be
addressed separately.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111564
While looking at LWG-2988 and P0558 it seems the issues were already
implemented, but the synopsis wasn't updated. Some of the tests didn't
validate the `noexcept` status. A few tests were missing completely:
- `atomic_wait_explicit`
- `atomic_notify_one`
- `atomic_notify_all`
Mark P0558 as complete, didn't investigate which version of libc++ first
includes this. It seems the paper has been retroactively applied. I
couldn't find whether this is correct, but looking at cppreference it
seems intended.
Completes
- LWG-2988 Clause 32 cleanup missed one typename
- P0558 Resolving atomic<T> named base class inconsistencies
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103765
This allows picking up on mingw triples that often use 'w64' instead
of 'pc' as the vendor part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111297
Arthur O'Dwyer