Current tail duplication integrated in bb layout is designed to increase the fallthrough from a BB's predecessor to its successor, but we have observed cases that duplication doesn't increase fallthrough, or it brings too much size overhead.
To overcome these two issues in function canTailDuplicateUnplacedPreds I add two checks:
make sure there is at least one duplication in current work set.
the number of duplication should not exceed the number of successors.
The modification in hasBetterLayoutPredecessor fixes a bug that potential predecessor must be at the bottom of a chain.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64376
Fix assertion error
```
bool llvm::MachineOperand::isRenamable() const: Assertion `Register::isPhysicalRegister(getReg()) && "isRenamable should only be checked on physical registers"' failed.
```
by checking if the register is 0 before invoking `isRenamable`.
Summary:
This patch mainly do such transformation
```
$R0 = OP ...
... // No read/clobber of $R0 and $R1
$R1 = COPY $R0 // $R0 is killed
```
Replace $R0 with $R1 and remove the COPY, we have
```
$R1 = OP ...
```
This transformation can also expose more opportunities for existing
copy elimination in MCP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67794
Summary:
Forcing Local Exec TLS requires the use of copy relocations. Copy
relocations need special handling in the runtime linker when being used
against TLS symbols, which is present in glibc, but not in FreeBSD nor
musl, and so cannot be relied upon. Moreover, copy relocations are a
hack that embed the size of an object in the ABI when it otherwise
wouldn't be, and break protected symbols (which are expected to be DSO
local), whilst also wasting space, thus they should be avoided whenever
possible. As discussed in D70398, RISC-V should move away from forcing
Local Exec, and instead use Initial Exec like other targets, with
possible linker relaxation to follow. The RISC-V GCC maintainers also
intend to adopt this more-conventional behaviour (see
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/issues/122).
Reviewers: asb, MaskRay
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: emaste, krytarowski, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, llvm-commits, bsdjhb
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70649
Summary: Adds tablegen patterns to explicitly handle fcopysign where the
magnitude and sign arguments have different types, due to the sign value casts
being removed the by DAGCombiner. Support for RV32IF follows in a separate
commit. Adds tests for all relevant scenarios except RV32IF.
Reviewers: lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70678
Summary:
The RISC-V backend used to generate `add <reg>, x0, <reg>` in a few
instances. It seems most places no longer generate this sequence.
This is semantically equivalent to `addi <reg>, <reg>, 0`, but the
latter has the advantage of being noted to be the canonical instruction
to be used for moves (which microarchitectures can and should recognise
as such).
The changed testcases use instruction aliases - `mv <reg>, <reg>` is an
alias for `addi <reg>, <reg>, 0`.
Reviewers: luismarques
Reviewed By: luismarques
Subscribers: hiraditya, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70124
Summary: Removes CFI CFA directives that could incorrectly propagate
beyond the basic block they were inteded for. Specifically it removes
the epilogue CFI directives. See the branch_and_tail_call test for an
example of the issue. Should fix the stack unwinding issues caused by
the incorrect directives.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, shiva0217
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69723
Summary: Removes CFI CFA directives that could incorrectly propagate
beyond the basic block they were inteded for. Specifically it removes
the epilogue CFI directives. See the branch_and_tail_call test for an
example of the issue. Should fix the stack unwinding issues caused by
the incorrect directives.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, shiva0217
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69723
Summary: When using the split sp adjustment and using the frame-pointer
we were still emitting CFI CFA directives based on the sp value. The
final sp-based offset also didn't reflect the two-stage sp adjust. There
remain CFI issues that aren't related to the split sp adjustment, and
thus will be addressed in a separate patch.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, shiva0217
Reviewed By: lenary, shiva0217
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69385
Summary: Adds tests necessary to properly show the impact of other
patches that affect the emission of CFI directives.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69721
Summary: Introduces the `InstrInfo::areMemAccessesTriviallyDisjoint`
hook. The test could check for instruction reorderings, but to avoid
being brittle it just checks instruction dependencies.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67046
Summary: The hook should work for any RISC-V register. Non-allocatable registers
do not need to be reserved, for the remaining the hook will only succeed
if you pass clang the -ffixed-xX flag. This builds upon D67185, which
currently only allows reserving GPRs.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69130
Summary:
Until this commit, these have lowered to a call to abort().
`llvm.trap()` now lowers to `unimp`, which should trap on all systems.
`llvm.debugtrap()` now lowers to `ebreak`, which is exactly what this
instruction is for.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69390
Complete fp16 support by ensuring that load extension / truncate store
operations are properly expanded.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69246
This adds support for reserving GPRs such that the compiler will not
choose a register for register allocation. The implementation follows
the same design as for AArch64; each reserved register becomes a target
feature and used for getting the reserved registers for a given
MachineFunction. The backend checks that it does not need to write to
any reserved register; if it does a relevant error is generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67185
Summary:
This patch implements the `TargetInstrInfo::verifyInstruction` hook for RISC-V. Currently the hook verifies the machine instruction's immediate operands, to check if the immediates are within the expected bounds. Without the hook invalid immediates are not detected except when doing assembly parsing, so they are silently emitted (including being truncated when emitting object code).
The bounds information is specified in tablegen by using the `OperandType` definition, which sets the `MCOperandInfo`'s `OperandType` field. Several RISC-V-specific immediate operand types were created, which extend the `MCInstrDesc`'s `OperandType` `enum`.
To have the hook called with `llc` pass it the `-verify-machineinstrs` option. For Clang add the cmake build config `-DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=True`, or temporarily patch `TargetPassConfig::addVerifyPass`.
Review concerns:
- The patch adds immediate operand type checks that cover at least the base ISA. There are several other operand types for the C extension and one type for the F/D extensions that were left out of this initial patch because they introduced further design concerns that I felt were best evaluated separately.
- Invalid register classes (e.g. passing a GPR register where a GPRC is expected) are already caught, so were not included.
- This design makes the more abstract `MachineInstr` verification depend on MC layer definitions, which arguably is not the cleanest design, but is in line with how things are done in other parts of the target and LLVM in general.
- There is some duplication of logic already present in the `MCOperandPredicate`s. Since the `MachineInstr` and `MCInstr` notions of immediates are fundamentally different, this is currently necessary.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67397
llvm-svn: 375006
LLVM may annotate the function with fastcc if there has only one caller
and there're no other caller out of the module and the function is not
naked or contain variable arguments.
The fastcc functions could pass the arguments by the caller saved registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68559
llvm-svn: 374857
Added some tests testing urem and srem operations with a constant divisor.
Patch by TG908 (Tim Gymnich)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68421
llvm-svn: 373830
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
ISD::SADDO uses the suggested sequence described in the section §2.4 of
the RISCV Spec v2.2. ISD::SSUBO uses the dual approach but checking for
(non-zero) positive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47927
llvm-svn: 373187
Most of the test changes are trivial instruction reorderings and differing
register allocations, without any obvious performance impact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66973
llvm-svn: 372106
Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433
llvm-svn: 371608
Summary:
Now that llvm-objdump allows target-specific options, we match the
`no-aliases` and `numeric` options for RISC-V, as supported by GNU objdump.
This is done by overriding the variables used for the command-line options, so
that the command-line options are still supported.
This patch updates all tests using `llvm-objdump -riscv-no-aliases` to use
`llvm-objdump -M no-aliases`.
Reviewers: luismarques, asb
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Subscribers: pzheng, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66139
llvm-svn: 371534
Summary:
Simplify the right shift of the intermediate result (given
in four parts) by using funnel shift.
There are some impact on lit tests, but that seems to be
related to register allocation differences due to how FSHR
is expanded on X86 (giving a slightly different operand order
for the OR operations compared to the old code).
Reviewers: leonardchan, RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, s.egerton, pzheng, bevinh, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67036
llvm-svn: 370813
The patch fixed the issue that RV64 didn't clear the upper bits
when return complex floating value with lp64 ABI.
float _Complex
complex_add(float _Complex a, float _Complex b)
{
return a + b;
}
RealResult = zero_extend(RealA + RealB)
ImageResult = ImageA + ImageB
Return (RealResult | (ImageResult << 32))
The patch introduces shouldExtendTypeInLibCall target hook to suppress
the AssertZext generation when lowering floating LibCall.
Thanks to Eli's comments from the Bugzilla
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42820
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65497
llvm-svn: 370275
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 369664
This allows arguments with the constraint A to be lowered to input nodes
for RISC-V, which implies a memory address stored in a register.
This patch adds the minimal amount of code required to get operands with
the right constraints to compile.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54296
llvm-svn: 369095
It caused assertions to fire when building Chromium:
lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugValues.cpp:331: bool
{anonymous}::LiveDebugValues::OpenRangesSet::empty() const: Assertion
`Vars.empty() == VarLocs.empty() && "open ranges are inconsistent"' failed.
See https://crbug.com/992871#c3 for how to reproduce.
> Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
>
> To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368579
Summary:
Ana Pazos reported a bug where we were not checking that an APInt would
fit into 64-bits before calling `getSExtValue()`. This caused asserts when
compiling large constants, such as i128s, as happens when compiling compiler-rt.
This patch adds a testcase and makes the callback less error-prone.
Reviewers: apazos, asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: luismarques
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66081
llvm-svn: 368572
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256 introduced more aggressive loop layout optimization which depends on profile information. If profile information is not available, the statically estimated profile information(generated by BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp) is used. If user program doesn't behave as BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp expected, the layout may be worse.
To be conservative this patch restores the original layout algorithm in plain mode. But user can still try the aggressive layout optimization with -force-precise-rotation-cost=true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65673
llvm-svn: 368339
Summary:
Clang will replace references to registers using ABI names in inline
assembly constraints with references to architecture names, but other
frontends do not. LLVM uses the regular assembly parser to parse inline asm,
so inline assembly strings can contain references to registers using their
ABI names.
This patch adds support for parsing constraints using either the ABI name or
the architectural register name. This means we do not need to implement the
ABI name replacement code in every single frontend, especially those like
Rust which are a very thin shim on top of LLVM IR's inline asm, and that
constraints can more closely match the assembly strings they refer to.
Reviewers: asb, simoncook
Reviewed By: simoncook
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, JDevlieghere, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65947
llvm-svn: 368303
Summary:
Currently the RISC-V backend does not realign the stack. This can be an issue even for the RV32I/RV64I ABIs (where the stack is 16-byte aligned), though is rare. It will be much more comment with RV32E (though the alignment requirements for common data types remain under-documented...).
This patch adds minimal support for stack realignment. It should cope with large realignments. It will error out if the stack needs realignment and variable sized objects are present.
It feels like a lot of the code like getFrameIndexReference and determineFrameLayout could be refactored somehow, as right now it feels fiddly and brittle. We also seem to allocate a lot more memory than GCC does for equivalent C code.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: wwei, jrtc27, s.egerton, MaskRay, Jim, lenary, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62007
llvm-svn: 368300
Sam Elliott