This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 290153
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).
Sorry for the churn!
llvm-svn: 289982
This is the 3rd of 3 patches to get reading and writing of
CodeView symbol and type records to use a single codepath.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26427
llvm-svn: 289978
Reverting because this breaks lld's gdb_index support - it's probably
double counting the abbrev relocation offset.
This reverts commit r289954.
llvm-svn: 289961
Input can be produced by ld -r, for example (a normal LLVM workflow
never hits this - LLVM only ever produces a single abbrev table in an
object (shared by multiple CUs), so the reloc's always 0, and when it's
linked together the relocation's resolved so it doesn't need to be
handled)
llvm-svn: 289954
One more attempt to re-commit the patch r285355, which I had to revert in r285362, because some tests were failing (the reason is because the size of the line_table varied depending on the full file name).
In the past the compiler always emitted .debug_line version 2, though some opcodes from DWARF 3 (e.g. DW_LNS_set_prologue_end, DW_LNS_set_epilogue_begin or DW_LNS_set_isa) and from DWARF 4 could be emitted by the compiler.
This patch changes version information of .debug_line to exactly match the DWARF version. For .debug_line version 4, a new field maximum_operations_per_instruction is emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16697
llvm-svn: 289925
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289920
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289902
Simplify CFG will try to sink the last instruction in a series of basic blocks,
creating a "common" instruction in the successor block (sinkLastInstruction).
When it does this, the debug location of the single instruction should be the
merged debug locations of the commoned instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27590
llvm-svn: 289828
If all the operands to a phi node are compares that have a RHS constant,
instcombine will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into
a single operation. When it does this, the debug location of the new op
should be the merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 8 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a compare that has a RHS constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289704
If all the operands to a phi node are a binop with a RHS constant, instcombine
will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into a single
operation. When it does this, the debug location of the new op should be the
merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 7 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a binop with RHS constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289699
If all the operands to a phi node are a cast, instcombine will try to pull
them through the phi node, combining them into a single cast. When it does
this, the debug location of the new cast should be the merged debug locations
of the phi node arguments.
Patch 6 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a cast operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289693
If all the operands to a phi node are a load, instcombine will try to pull
them through the phi node, combining them into a single load. When it does
this, the debug location of the new load should be the merged debug locations
of the phi node arguments.
Patch 5 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a load operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289688
If all the operands to a phi node are getelementptr, instcombine
will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into a single
operation. When it does this, the debug location of the new getelementptr
should be the merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 4 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a getelementptr operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289684
If all the operands to a phi node are of the same operation, instcombine
will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into a single
operation. When it does this, the debug location of the operation should
be the merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 3 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a compare operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289681
If all the operands to a phi node are of the same operation, instcombine
will try to pull them through the phi node, combining them into a single
operation. When it does this, the debug location of the operation should
be the merged debug locations of the phi node arguments.
Patch 2 of 8 for D26256. Folding of a binary operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26256
llvm-svn: 289679
Follow-up to r289256, address a FIXME to avoid resetting the column
number. This reduced .debug_line by 2.6% in a RelWithDebInfo
self-build of clang.
llvm-svn: 289620
DWARF specifies that "line 0" really means "no appropriate source
location" in the line table. By default, use this for branch targets
and some other cases that have no specified source location, to
prevent inheriting unfortunate line numbers from physically preceding
instructions (which might be from completely unrelated source).
Updated patch allows enabling or suppressing this behavior for all
unspecified source locations.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24180
llvm-svn: 289468
LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a
misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset
argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location
that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset
into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the
DWARF specification.
This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct
offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly
emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable,
thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression.
While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this
to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the
correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are
gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if
individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't
interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present
undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an
old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly,
because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at
the top of the stack.
As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient
encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a
non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the
value into place manually.
This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't
exercised before.
<rdar://problem/29335809>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550
llvm-svn: 289266
Like DBG_VALUE, these emit nothing to the .text section, and sometimes
have no source location specified. Just ignore them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D27492
llvm-svn: 289256
The relocations for `DIEEntry::EmitValue` were wrong for Win64
(emitting FK_Data_4 instead of FK_SecRel_4). This corrects that
oversight so that the DWARF data is correct in Win64 COFF files.
Fixes PR15393.
Patch by Jameson Nash <jameson@juliacomputing.com> based on a patch
by David Majnemer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21731
llvm-svn: 289013
When a function F is inlined, InlineFunction extends the debug location of every
instruction inlined from F by adding an InlinedAt.
However, if an instruction has a 'null' debug location, InlineFunction would
propagate the callsite debug location to it. This behavior existed since
revision 210459.
Revision 210459 was originally committed specifically to workaround the lack of
debug information for instructions inlined from intrinsic functions (which are
usually declared with attributes `__always_inline__, __nodebug__`).
The problem with revision 210459 is that it doesn't make any sort of distinction
between instructions inlined from a 'nodebug' function and instructions which
are inlined from a function built with debug info. This issue may lead to
incorrect stepping in the debugger.
This patch works under the assumption that a nodebug function does not have a
DISubprogram. When a function F is inlined into another function G,
InlineFunction checks if F has debug info associated with it.
For nodebug functions, the InlineFunction logic is unchanged (i.e. it would
still propagate the callsite debugloc to the inlined instructions). Otherwise,
InlineFunction no longer propagates the callsite debug location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27462
llvm-svn: 288895
so we can stop using DW_OP_bit_piece with the wrong semantics.
The entire back story can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161114/405934.html
The gist is that in LLVM we've been misinterpreting DW_OP_bit_piece's
offset field to mean the offset into the source variable rather than
the offset into the location at the top the DWARF expression stack. In
order to be able to fix this in a subsequent patch, this patch
introduces a dedicated DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operation with the
semantics that we used to apply to DW_OP_bit_piece, which is what we
actually need while inside of LLVM. This patch is complete with a
bitcode upgrade for expressions using the old format. It does not yet
fix the DWARF backend to use DW_OP_bit_piece correctly.
Implementation note: We discussed several options for implementing
this, including reserving a dedicated field in DIExpression for the
fragment size and offset, but using an custom operator at the end of
the expression works just fine and is more efficient because we then
only pay for it when we need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27361
rdar://problem/29335809
llvm-svn: 288683
In r266692, we made it possible to emit linkage names for just inlined
functions, putting the attribute on the abstract origin. Make sure we
don't think the linkage-name was already emitted on a declaration.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D27320
llvm-svn: 288450
This prevents erratic stepping behavior as well as incorrect source attribution
for sample profiling.
Reviewers: dblakie
Subscribers: llvm-commit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27290
llvm-svn: 288442
The LLDB tests are now ready for this patch.
DWARF specifies that "line 0" really means "no appropriate source
location" in the line table. Use this for branch targets and some
other cases that have no specified source location, to prevent
inheriting unfortunate line numbers from physically preceding
instructions (which might be from completely unrelated source).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24180
llvm-svn: 288283
DWARF specifies that "line 0" really means "no appropriate source
location" in the line table. Use this for branch targets and some
other cases that have no specified source location, to prevent
inheriting unfortunate line numbers from physically preceding
instructions (which might be from completely unrelated source).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24180
llvm-svn: 288212
Enable codeview emission for windows-itanium targets. Co-opt an existing
test (which is derived from a C source file and should therefore be
identical across the Itanium and MS ABIs).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26693
llvm-svn: 287567
if it is more specific than the one in its DW_AT_specification.
If a static member is an array, the translation unit containing the
member definition may have a more specific type (including its length)
than TUs only seeing the class declaration. This patch adds a
DW_AT_type to the member's DW_TAG_variable in addition to the
DW_AT_specification in these cases. The member type in the
DW_AT_specification still shows the more generic type (without the
length) to avoid defeating type uniquing.
The DWARF standard discourages “duplicating” a DW_AT_type in a member
variable definition but doesn’t explicitly forbid it. Having the more
specific type (with the array length) available is what allows the
debugger to print the contents of a static array member variable.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26368
rdar://problem/28706946
llvm-svn: 286302
Using a pattern similar to that of YamlIO, this allows
us to have a single codepath for translating codeview
records to and from serialized byte streams. The
current patch only hooks this up to the reading of
CodeView type records. A subsequent patch will hook
it up for writing of CodeView type records, and then a
third patch will hook up the reading and writing of
CodeView symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26040
llvm-svn: 285836
DW_TAG_atomic_type was already included in Dwarf.defs and emitted correctly,
however Verifier didn't recognize it as valid.
Thus we introduce the following changes:
* Make DW_TAG_atomic_type valid tag for IR and DWARF (enabled only with -gdwarf-5)
* Add it to related docs
* Add DebugInfo tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26144
llvm-svn: 285624
Adrian Prantl