to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
In debug builds, getting this wrong will trigger asserts.
In production builds, it will send an error reply if none was sent,
and drop redundant replies. (And log).
No tests because this is always a programming error.
(We did have some cases of this, but I fixed them with the new dispatcher).
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53399
llvm-svn: 345144
Summary:
The library has graduated from clangd to llvm/Support.
This is a mechanical change to move to the new API and remove the old one.
Main API changes:
- namespace clang::clangd::json --> llvm::json
- json::Expr --> json::Value
- Expr::asString() etc --> Value::getAsString() etc
- unsigned longs need a cast (due to r336541 adding lossless integer support)
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, omtcyfz, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49077
llvm-svn: 336549
Summary:
This has a bit of a blast radius, but I think there's enough value in "forcing"
us to give names to these async tasks for debugging. Guessing about what
multithreaded code is doing is so unfun...
The "file" param attached to the tasks may seem to be redundant with the thread
names, but note that thread names are truncated to 15 chars on linux!
We'll be lucky to get the whole basename...
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43388
llvm-svn: 325480
Summary:
The chrome trace viewer requires events within a thread to strictly nest.
So we need to record the lifetime of the Span objects, not the contexts.
But we still want to show the relationship between spans where a context crosses
threads, so do this with flow events (i.e. arrows).
Before: https://photos.app.goo.gl/q4Dd9u9xtelaXk1v1
After: https://photos.app.goo.gl/5RNLmAMLZR3unvY83
(This could stand some further improvement, in particular I think we want a
container span whenever we schedule work on a thread. But that's another patch)
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43272
llvm-svn: 325220
Summary:
Instead of passing Context explicitly around, we now have a thread-local
Context object `Context::current()` which is an implicit argument to
every function.
Most manipulation of this should use the WithContextValue helper, which
augments the current Context to add a single KV pair, and restores the
old context on destruction.
Advantages are:
- less boilerplate in functions that just propagate contexts
- reading most code doesn't require understanding context at all, and
using context as values in fewer places still
- fewer options to pass the "wrong" context when it changes within a
scope (e.g. when using Span)
- contexts pass through interfaces we can't modify, such as VFS
- propagating contexts across threads was slightly tricky (e.g.
copy vs move, no move-init in lambdas), and is now encapsulated in
the threadpool
Disadvantages are all the usual TLS stuff - hidden magic, and
potential for higher memory usage on threads that don't use the
context. (In practice, it's just one pointer)
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42517
llvm-svn: 323872
Summary:
This is probably the right behavior for distributed tracers, and makes unpaired
begin-end events impossible without requiring Spans to be bound to a thread.
The API is conceptually clean but syntactically awkward. As discussed offline,
this is basically a naming problem and will go away if (when) we use TLS to
store the current context.
The apparently-unrelated change to onScopeExit are because its move semantics
broken if Func is POD-like since r322838. This is true of function pointers,
and the lambda I use here that captures two pointers only.
I've raised this issue on llvm-dev and will revert this part if we fix it in
some other way.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42499
llvm-svn: 323511
Summary:
EventTracer interface now contains two methods:
- spanEvent for events that have duration,
- instant for events that are instant.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, luckygeck, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40489
llvm-svn: 320708
Summary:
[clangd] Tracing improvements
Compose JSON using JSONExpr
Allow attaching metadata to spans (and avoid it if tracing is off)
Attach IDs and responses of JSON RPCs to their spans
The downside is that large responses make the trace viewer sluggish.
We should make our responses less huge :-) Or fix trace viewer.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40132
llvm-svn: 318928
Summary:
This lets you visualize clangd's activity on different threads over time,
and understand critical paths of requests and object lifetimes.
The data produced can be visualized in Chrome (at chrome://tracing), or
in a standalone copy of catapult (http://github.com/catapult-project/catapult)
This patch consists of:
- a command line flag "-trace" that causes clangd to emit JSON trace data
- an API (in Trace.h) allowing clangd code to easily add events to the stream
- several initial uses of this API to capture JSON-RPC requests, builds, logs
Example result: https://photos.app.goo.gl/12L9swaz5REGQ1rm1
Caveats:
- JSON serialization is ad-hoc (isn't it everywhere?) so the API is
limited to naming events rather than attaching arbitrary metadata.
I'd like to fix this (I think we could use a JSON-object abstraction).
- The recording is very naive: events are written immediately by
locking a mutex. Contention on the mutex might disturb performance.
- For now it just traces instants or spans on the current thread.
There are other things that make sense to show (cross-thread flows,
non-thread resources such as ASTs). But we have to start somewhere.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39086
llvm-svn: 317193
Chandler Carruth