If the same stream object is used for multiple compiles, the PAL metadata from eariler compilations will leak into later one. See https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/llpc/issues/882 for how this is happening in LLPC.
No tests were added because multiple compiles will have to happen using the same pass manager, and I do not see a setup for that on the LLVM side. Let me know if there is a good way to test this.
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85667
This patch implements the handling for the R_PPC64_PCREL_OPT relocation as well
as the GOT relocation for the associated R_PPC64_GOT_PCREL34 relocation.
On Power10 targets with PC-Relative addressing, the linker can relax
GOT-relative accesses to PC-Relative under some conditions. Since the sequence
consists of a prefixed load, followed by a non-prefixed access (load or store),
the linker needs to replace the first instruction (as the replacement
instruction will be prefixed). The compiler communicates to the linker that
this optimization is safe by placing the two aforementioned relocations on the
GOT load (of the address).
The linker then does two things:
- Convert the load from the got into a PC-Relative add to compute the address
relative to the PC
- Find the instruction referred to by the second relocation (R_PPC64_PCREL_OPT)
and replace the first with the PC-Relative version of it
It is important to synchronize the mapping from legacy memory instructions to
their PC-Relative form. Hence, this patch adds a file to be included by both
the compiler and the linker so they're always in agreement.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84360
So that the configuration box does not make a part of the plot invisible.
Reviewers: sivachandra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85953
Thunk alignment is added in thie patch when using pc-rel instructions
to avoid crossing the 64 byte boundary.
Patched by: nemanjai, NeHuang
Reviewed By: sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85973
As with use-associated symbols, copy the attributes and flags from the
original symbol onto host-associated symbols when they are created.
This was showing up as an error on a deallocate of a host-associated
name. We reported an error because the symbol didn't have the POINTER
or ALLOCATABLE attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85763
CMake log:
```
CMake Error at D:/llvm-project/llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:823 (add_executable):
Target "clangd" links to target "Threads::Threads" but the target was not
found. Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an IMPORTED target, or
an ALIAS target is missing?
Call Stack (most recent call first):
D:/llvm-project/clang/cmake/modules/AddClang.cmake:150 (add_llvm_executable)
D:/llvm-project/clang/cmake/modules/AddClang.cmake:160 (add_clang_executable)
D:/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/tool/CMakeLists.txt:4 (add_clang_tool)
CMake Error at D:/llvm-project/llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:821 (add_executable):
Target "ClangdTests" links to target "Threads::Threads" but the target was
not found. Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an IMPORTED
target, or an ALIAS target is missing?
Call Stack (most recent call first):
D:/llvm-project/llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:1417 (add_llvm_executable)
D:/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CMakeLists.txt:32 (add_unittest)
CMake Error at D:/llvm-project/llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:527 (add_library):
Target "RemoteIndexProtos" links to target "Threads::Threads" but the
target was not found. Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an
IMPORTED target, or an ALIAS target is missing?
Call Stack (most recent call first):
D:/llvm-project/clang/cmake/modules/AddClang.cmake:103 (llvm_add_library)
D:/llvm-project/llvm/cmake/modules/FindGRPC.cmake:105 (add_clang_library)
D:/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/index/remote/CMakeLists.txt:2 (generate_grpc_protos)
CMake Error at D:/llvm-project/llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:527 (add_library):
Target "clangdRemoteIndex" links to target "Threads::Threads" but the
target was not found. Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an
IMPORTED target, or an ALIAS target is missing?
Call Stack (most recent call first):
D:/llvm-project/clang/cmake/modules/AddClang.cmake:103 (llvm_add_library)
D:/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/index/remote/CMakeLists.txt:11 (add_clang_library)
CMake Error at D:/llvm-project/llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:527 (add_library):
Target "clangdRemoteMarshalling" links to target "Threads::Threads" but the
target was not found. Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an
IMPORTED target, or an ALIAS target is missing?
Call Stack (most recent call first):
D:/llvm-project/clang/cmake/modules/AddClang.cmake:103 (llvm_add_library)
D:/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/index/remote/marshalling/CMakeLists.txt:1 (add_clang_library)
CMake Error at D:/llvm-project/llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:823 (add_executable):
Target "clangd-index-server" links to target "Threads::Threads" but the
target was not found. Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an
IMPORTED target, or an ALIAS target is missing?
```
Reviewed By: kbobyrev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86052
According to the LLVM Language Reference, 'cmpxchg' accepts integer or pointer
types. Several MLIR tests were using it with floats as it appears possible to
programmatically construct and print such an instruction, but it cannot be
parsed back. Use integers instead.
Depends On D85899
Reviewed By: flaub, rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85900
This adds a test for D85862 to ensure that preprocessor definitions
passed on command lines don't regress in future.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85967
Legacy implementation of the LLVM dialect in MLIR contained an instance of
llvm::Module as it was required to parse LLVM IR types. The access to the data
layout of this module was exposed to the users for convenience, but in practice
this layout has always been the default one obtained by parsing an empty layout
description string. Current implementation of the dialect no longer relies on
wrapping LLVM IR types, but it kept an instance of DataLayout for
compatibility. This effectively forces a single data layout to be used across
all modules in a given MLIR context, which is not desirable. Remove DataLayout
from the LLVM dialect and attach it as a module attribute instead. Since MLIR
does not yet have support for data layouts, use the LLVM DataLayout in string
form with verification inside MLIR. Introduce the layout when converting a
module to the LLVM dialect and keep the default "" description for
compatibility.
This approach should be replaced with a proper MLIR-based data layout when it
becomes available, but provides an immediate solution to compiling modules with
different layouts, e.g. for GPUs.
This removes the need for LLVMDialectImpl, which is also removed.
Depends On D85650
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85652
Existing implementation always aborts on syntax errors in a DataLayout
description. While this is meaningful for consuming textual IR modules, it is
inconvenient for users that may need fine-grained control over the layout from,
e.g., command-line options. Propagate errors through the parsing functions and
only abort in the top-level parsing function instead.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85650
The functions `__register_frame`/`__deregister_frame` are not
available on z/OS, so add a guard to not use them.
Reviewed By: lhames, abhina.sreeskantharajan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84787
CreateFunctionDeclaration should just take a StringRef. GetDeclarationName is
(only) used by CreateFunctionDeclaration so that's why now also takes a
StringRef.
This fixes existent FIXMEs: we should not error out when unable to
find the number of relocations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85891
The RISC-V Privileged Specification 1.11 defines `mcountinhibit`, which
has the same numeric CSR value as `mucounteren` from 1.09.1. This patch
enables the use of the old `mucounteren` name.
Patch by Yuichi Sugiyama.
Reviewed By: lenary, jrtc27, pzheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85067
This fixes the "Unable to insert indirect branch" fatal error sometimes
seen when generating position-independent code.
Patch by msizanoen1
Reviewed By: jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84833
Splitted out from D85519.
Currently we report "PT_DYNAMIC segment offset + size exceeds the size of the file",
this changes it to
"PT_DYNAMIC segment offset (0x1234) + file size (0x5678) exceeds the size of the file (0x68ab)"
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85654
The current demand propagator for addition will mark all input bits at and right of the alive output bit as alive. But carry won't propagate beyond a bit for which both operands are zero (or one/zero in the case of subtraction) so a more accurate answer is possible given known bits.
I derived a propagator by working through truth tables and using a bit-reversed addition to make demand ripple to the right, but I'm not sure how to make a convincing argument for its correctness in the comments yet. Nevertheless, here's a minimal implementation and test to get feedback.
This would help in a situation where, for example, four bytes (<128) packed into an int are added with four others SIMD-style but only one of the four results is actually read.
Known A: 0_______0_______0_______0_______
Known B: 0_______0_______0_______0_______
AOut: 00000000001000000000000000000000
AB, current: 00000000001111111111111111111111
AB, patch: 00000000001111111000000000000000
Committed on behalf of: @rrika (Erika)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72423
Perform lowerShuffleWithVPMOV as part of the v16i8/v8i16 shuffle lowering stages, which are the only types that are currently supported.
We need to expand support for lowering shuffles as truncations to fix the remaining regressions in D66004
This is the error message from the OS, so we shouldn't check against the
OS-specific part of the string.
Fixes the test on Windows which returns a different error message.
In D83876 the consensus seems that LLDB should never deleted orphaned modules
implicitly. However, SBDebugger::DeleteTarget is currently doing exactly that.
This code was added in 753406221b but I don't see
any explanation in the commit, so I think we should delete it.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83933
The class contains an enum listing all host integer types as well as
some non-host types. This setup is a remnant of a time when this class
was actually implemented in terms of host integer types. Now that we are
using llvm::APInt, they are mostly useless and mean that each function
needs to enumerate all of these cases even though it treats most of them
identically.
I only leave e_sint and e_uint to denote the integer signedness, but I
want to remove that in a follow-up as well.
Removing these cases simplifies most of these functions, with the only
exception being PromoteToMaxType, which can no longer rely on a simple
enum comparison to determine what needs to be promoted.
This also makes the class ready to work with arbitrary integer sizes, so
it does not need to be modified when someone needs to add a larger
integer size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85836
With -flimit-debug-info, we can run into cases when we only have a class
as a declaration, but we do have a definition of a nested class. In this
case, clang will hit an assertion when adding a member to an incomplete
type (but only if it's adding a c++ class, and not C struct).
It turns out we already had code to handle a similar situation arising
in the -gmodules scenario. This extends the code to handle
-flimit-debug-info as well, and reorganizes bits of other code handling
completion of types to move functions doing similar things closer
together.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85968
Right now the only places in the SB API where lldb:: ModuleSP instances are
destroyed are in SBDebugger::MemoryPressureDetected (where it's just attempted
but not guaranteed) and in SBDebugger::DeleteTarget (which will be removed in
D83933). Tests that directly create an lldb::ModuleSP and never create a target
therefore currently leak lldb::Module instances. This triggers the sanity checks
in lldbtest that make sure that the global module list is empty after a test.
This patch adds SBModule::GarbageCollectAllocatedModules as an explicit way to
clean orphaned lldb::ModuleSP instances. Also we now start calling this method
at the end of each test run and move the sanity check behind that call to make
this work. This way even tests that don't create targets can pass the sanity
check.
This fixes TestUnicodeSymbols.py when D83865 is applied (which makes that the
sanity checks actually fail the test).
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83876
We didn't do anything with the llvm::Error we get from `Open`, so when we end up in the
error case we just crash due to the llvm::Error sanity check. Also add the missing newline
behind the error message so it no longer messes with the next (lldb) prompt.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85970
`lldb-server platform --socket-file /any/path` currently always fails to create
the socket file. This stopped working after D67424 which changed the
input variables of `writeFileAtomically` slightly. We're expected to
pass in a temporary path template (`/tmp/foo-%%%%%`) and the final
path we want to write. Instead we currently pass in the never set
`temp_file_path` as the temporary path (which will make this function always
fail) and pass in the temp_file_spec's path as the final path (which is actually
the template path such as `/tmp/foo-%%%%%`) instead of the actual path
we want to write (e.g. `/tmp/foo`).
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85890
Support f128 using VE instructions. Update regression tests.
I've noticed there is no load or store i128 test, so I add them too.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86035
This parameter isn't used anywhere in LLDB nor the Swift downstream branch. It
also doesn't really fit into the TypeSystem APIs that usually don't return
additional related functionality via some output parameters. Also the
implementations already states that the calculated value there is wrong.
Let's remove it. If we need this functionality at some point then Swift's much
nicer `GetByteStride` function seems like the way to go.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84299
Steven Perron