This patch adds the support required for using the __riscv_save and
__riscv_restore libcalls to implement a size-optimization for prologue
and epilogue code, whereby the spill and restore code of callee-saved
registers is implemented by common functions to reduce code duplication.
Logic is also included to ensure that if both this optimization and
shrink wrapping are enabled then the prologue and epilogue code can be
safely inserted into the basic blocks chosen by shrink wrapping.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62686
Summary:
LLVM issues a warning if passed unknown target features. Neither I nor
@asb noticed this until after https://reviews.llvm.org/D63498 landed.
This patch stops passing the (unknown) "save-restore" target feature to
the LLVM backend, but continues to emit a warning if a driver asks for
`-msave-restore`. The default of assuming `-mno-save-restore` (and
emitting no warnings) remains.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, cfe-commits, asb
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64008
llvm-svn: 364777
Summary:
The GCC RISC-V toolchain accepts `-msave-restore` and `-mno-save-restore`
to control whether libcalls are used for saving and restoring the stack within
prologues and epilogues.
Clang currently errors if someone passes -msave-restore or -mno-save-restore.
This means that people need to change build configurations to use clang. This
patch adds these flags, so that clang invocations can now match gcc.
As the RISC-V backend does not currently have a `save-restore` target feature,
we emit a warning if someone requests `-msave-restore`. LLVM does not error if
we pass the (unimplemented) target features `+save-restore` or `-save-restore`.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63498
llvm-svn: 364018
As RV64 codegen has not yet been upstreamed into LLVM, we focus on RV32 driver
support (RV64 to follow).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963
llvm-svn: 322276
lewis-revill