When checking whether an smin is positive, we can move the comparison to one of the inputs if the other is known positive. If the known positive one is the min, then the other can't be negative. If the other is the min, then we compute the min.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17873
llvm-svn: 263059
As part of r251146 InstCombine was extended to call computeKnownBits on
every value in the function to determine whether it happens to be
constant. This increases typical compiletime by 1-3% (5% in irgen+opt
time) in my measurements. On the other hand this case did not trigger
once in the whole llvm-testsuite.
This patch introduces the notion of ExpensiveCombines which are only
enabled for OptLevel > 2. I removed the check in InstructionSimplify as
that is called from various places where the OptLevel is not known but
given the rarity of the situation I think a check in InstCombine is
enough.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16835
llvm-svn: 263047
Original commit message:
calculate builtin_object_size if argument is a removable pointer
This patch fixes calculating correct value for builtin_object_size function
when pointer is used only in builtin_object_size function call and never
after that.
Patch by Strahinja Petrovic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17337
Reland the original change with a small modification (first do a null check
and then do the cast) to satisfy ubsan.
llvm-svn: 263011
This experiment was originally about trying to use facts implied dominating conditions to infer more precise known bits. While the compile time was found to be acceptable on several large code bases, we never found sufficiently profitable examples to justify turning on the code by default. Given this, it's time to abandon the experiment.
Several folks have commented that they've found this useful for experimentation, but nothing has come of those experiments. Given how easy the patch is to apply, there's no reason to leave the code in tree.
For anyone interested in further investigation in this area, I recommend finding the summary email I sent on one of the original review threads. In particular, I now believe the use-list based approach is strictly worse than the dom-tree-walking approach.
llvm-svn: 262646
Given that we're not actually reducing the instruction count in the included
regression tests, I think we would call this a canonicalization step.
The motivation comes from the example in PR26702:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
If we hoist the bitwise logic ahead of the bitcast, the previously unoptimizable
example of:
define <4 x i32> @is_negative(<4 x i32> %x) {
%lobit = ashr <4 x i32> %x, <i32 31, i32 31, i32 31, i32 31>
%not = xor <4 x i32> %lobit, <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>
%bc = bitcast <4 x i32> %not to <2 x i64>
%notnot = xor <2 x i64> %bc, <i64 -1, i64 -1>
%bc2 = bitcast <2 x i64> %notnot to <4 x i32>
ret <4 x i32> %bc2
}
Simplifies to the expected:
define <4 x i32> @is_negative(<4 x i32> %x) {
%lobit = ashr <4 x i32> %x, <i32 31, i32 31, i32 31, i32 31>
ret <4 x i32> %lobit
}
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17583
llvm-svn: 262645
Summary: This is the last step toward supporting aggregate memory access in instcombine. This explodes stores of arrays into a serie of stores for each element, allowing them to be optimized.
Reviewers: joker.eph, reames, hfinkel, majnemer, mgrang
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17828
llvm-svn: 262530
Summary: This is another step toward improving fca support. This unpack load of array in a series of load to array's elements.
Reviewers: chandlerc, joker.eph, majnemer, reames, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15890
llvm-svn: 262521
As noted in the code comment, I don't think we can do the same transform that we do for
*scalar* integers comparisons to *vector* integers comparisons because it might pessimize
the general case.
Exhibit A for an incomplete integer comparison ISA remains x86 SSE/AVX: it only has EQ and GT
for integer vectors.
But we should now recognize all the variants of this construct and produce the optimal code
for the cases shown in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26701
llvm-svn: 262424
This patch fixes calculating correct value for builtin_object_size function
when pointer is used only in builtin_object_size function call and never
after that.
Patch by Strahinja Petrovic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17337
llvm-svn: 262337
The intended effect of this patch in conjunction with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259392http://reviews.llvm.org/rL260145
is that customers using the AVX intrinsics in C will benefit from combines when
the load mask is constant:
__m128 mload_zeros(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0));
}
__m128 mload_fakeones(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(1));
}
__m128 mload_ones(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0x80000000));
}
__m128 mload_oneset(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set_epi32(0x80000000, 0, 0, 0));
}
...so none of the above will actually generate a masked load for optimized code.
This is the masked load counterpart to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL262064
llvm-svn: 262269
The intended effect of this patch in conjunction with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259392http://reviews.llvm.org/rL260145
is that customers using the AVX intrinsics in C will benefit from combines when
the store mask is constant:
void mstore_zero_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0), v);
}
void mstore_fake_ones_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(1), v);
}
void mstore_ones_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0x80000000), v);
}
void mstore_one_set_elt_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set_epi32(0x80000000, 0, 0, 0), v);
}
...so none of the above will actually generate a masked store for optimized code.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17485
llvm-svn: 262064
This is part of the payoff for the refactoring in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL261649http://reviews.llvm.org/rL261707
In addition to removing a pile of duplicated code, the xor case was
missing the optimization for vector types because it checked
"SrcTy->isIntegerTy()" rather than "SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy()"
like 'and' and 'or' were already doing.
This solves part of:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
llvm-svn: 261750
Summary:
Previously we had a notion of convergent functions but not of convergent
calls. This is insufficient to correctly analyze calls where the target
is unknown, e.g. indirect calls.
Now a call is convergent if it targets a known-convergent function, or
if it's explicitly marked as convergent. As usual, we can remove
convergent where we can prove that no convergent operations are
performed in the call.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jingyue
Subscribers: hfinkel, jhen, tra, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17317
llvm-svn: 261544
IRBuilder has two ways of putting bundle operands on calls: the default
operand bundle, and an overload of CreateCall that takes an operand
bundle list.
Previously, this overload used a default argument of None. This made it
impossible to distinguish between the case were the caller doesn't care
about bundles, and the case where the caller explicitly wants no
bundles. We behaved as if they wanted the latter behavior rather than
the former, which led to problems with simplifylibcalls and WinEH.
This change fixes it by making the parameter non-optional, so we can
distinguish these two cases.
llvm-svn: 261258
Summary: Store and loads unpacked by instcombine do not always have the right alignement. This explicitely compute the alignement and set it.
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, reames, hfinkel, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17326
llvm-svn: 261139
For some cases, InstCombine replaces the sequence of xor/sub instruction
followed by cmp instruction into a single cmp instruction.
However, this replacement may result suboptimal result especially when
the xor/sub has more than one use, as discussed in
bug 26465 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26465).
This patch make the replacement happen only when xor/sub has only one
use.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16915
Patch by Taewook Oh!
llvm-svn: 260695
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Fold IntToPtr and PtrToInt into preceding loads.
Currently we only fold a BitCast into a Load when the BitCast is its
only user.
Do the same for any no-op cast.
Patch by Philip Pfaffe!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9152
llvm-svn: 260612
When optimizing a extractvalue(load), we generate a load from the
aggregate type. This load didn't have alignment set and so would
get the alignment of the type. This breaks when the type is packed
and so the alignment should be lower.
For example, loading { int, int } would give us alignment of 4, but
the original load from this type may have an alignment of 1 if packed.
Reviewed by David Majnemer
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17158
llvm-svn: 260587
Summary:
When a PHI is used only to be compared with zero, it is possible to replace an
incoming value with any non-zero constant if the incoming value can be proved as
a known nonzero value. For example, in below code, we can replace the incoming value %v with
any non-zero constant based on the fact that the PHI is only used to be compared with zero
and %v is a known non-zero value:
%v = select %cond, 1, 2
%p = phi [%v, BB] ...
%c = icmp eq, %p, 0
Reviewers: mcrosier, jmolloy, sanjoy
Subscribers: hfinkel, mcrosier, majnemer, llvm-commits, haicheng, bmakam, mssimpso, gberry
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16240
llvm-svn: 260530
We introduced gc.relocates of vector-of-pointer types a couple of weeks back. Somehow, I missed updating the InstCombine rule to account for this. If we hit this code path with a vector-of-pointers gc.relocate, we'd crash on a cast<PointerType>.
I also took the chance to do a bit of code style cleanup.
llvm-svn: 260279
According to git bisect, this is the root cause of a miscompile for Regex in
libLLVMSupport. I am still working on reducing a test case.
The actual bug may be elsewhere and this commit just exposed it.
Anyway, at the moment, to reproduce, follow these steps:
1. Build clang and libLTO in release mode.
2. Create a new build directory <stage2> and cd into it.
3. Use clang and libLTO from #1 to build llvm-extract in Release mode + asserts
using -O2 -flto
4. Run llvm-extract -ralias '.*bar' -S test/Other/extract-alias.ll
Result:
program doesn't contain global named '.*bar'!
Expected result:
@a0a0bar = alias void ()* @bar
@a0bar = alias void ()* @bar
declare void @bar()
Note: In step #3, if you don't use lto or asserts, the miscompile disappears.
llvm-svn: 259674
A masked store with a zero mask means there's no store.
A masked store with an allOnes mask means it's a normal vector store.
This is a continuation of:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259369
llvm-svn: 259392
This miscompile came about because we tried to use a transform which was
only appropriate for xor operators when addition was present.
This fixes PR26407.
llvm-svn: 259375
A masked load with a zero mask means there's no load.
A masked load with an allOnes mask means it's a normal vector load.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16691
llvm-svn: 259369
We would infinite loop because we created a shufflevector that was wider than
needed and then failed to combine that with the insertelement. When subsequently
visiting the extractelement from that shuffle, we see that it's unnecessary,
delete it, and trigger another visit to the insertelement.
llvm-svn: 259236
This is a step towards solving PR25892:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25892
It won't handle the reported case. As noted by the 'TODO' comments in the patch,
we need to relax the hasOneUse() constraint and also match patterns that include
memset_chk() and the llvm.memset() intrinsic in addition to memset().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16337
llvm-svn: 258816
The intrinsic target prefix should match the target name
as it appears in the triple.
This is not yet complete, but gets most of the important ones.
llvm.AMDGPU.* intrinsics used by mesa and libclc are still handled
for compatability for now.
llvm-svn: 258557
This is similar to the bug/fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26211http://reviews.llvm.org/rL258325
The fmin() test case reveals another bug caused by sloppy
code duplication. It will crash without this patch because
fp128 is a valid floating-point type, but we would think
that we had matched a function that used doubles.
The new helper function can be used to replace similar
checks that are used in several other places in this file.
llvm-svn: 258428
The test case will crash without this patch because the subsequent call to
hasUnsafeAlgebra() assumes that the call instruction is an FPMathOperator
(ie, returns an FP type).
This part of the function signature check was omitted for the sqrt() case,
but seems to be in place for all other transforms.
Before:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL257400
...we would have needlessly continued execution in optimizeSqrt(), but the
bug was harmless because we'd eventually fail some other check and return
without damage.
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26211
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16198
llvm-svn: 258325
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
As with D15937, the intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform
except that we use the pow call's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than a function-level
attribute.
The TODO comment notes a potential follow-on patch that would propagate FMF to the new
instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16122
llvm-svn: 258153
This contains a fix for the issue that caused the revert:
we no longer assume that we can insert instructions after the
instruction that produces the base pointer. We previously
assumed that this would be ok, because the instruction produces
a value and therefore is not a terminator. This is false for invoke
instructions. We will now insert these new instruction directly
at the location of the users.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Look through PHIs, GEPs, IntToPtrs and PtrToInts to expose more constants when comparing GEPs
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the base
pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have complex
pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs, conversions to
or from integers, etc) the value of the original base pointer will be
hidden to the optimizer and this transformation will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the relevant
uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The GEP comparison
will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257897
There are several requirements that ended up with this design;
1. Matching bitreversals is too heavyweight for InstCombine and doesn't really need to be done so early.
2. Bitreversals and byteswaps are very related in their matching logic.
3. We want to implement support for matching more advanced bswap/bitreverse patterns like partial bswaps/bitreverses.
4. Bswaps are best matched early in InstCombine.
The result of these is that a new utility function is created in Transforms/Utils/Local.h that can be configured to search for bswaps, bitreverses or both. InstCombine uses it to find only bswaps, CGP uses it to find only bitreversals.
We can then extend the matching logic in one place only.
llvm-svn: 257875
Prepatory patch before changing LibCallSimplifier to use the FMF.
Also, tighten the CHECK lines and give the tests more meaningful names.
Similar changes to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL257414
llvm-svn: 257481
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
The intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform except
that we use the sqrt instruction's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than the
function-level attribute.
But this raises a bug noted by the new FIXME comment.
In order to do this transform:
sqrt((x * x) * y) ---> fabs(x) * sqrt(y)
...we need all of the sqrt, the first fmul, and the second fmul to be 'fast'.
If any of those ops is strict, we should bail out.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15937
llvm-svn: 257400
In setInsertionPoint if the value is not a PHI, Instruction or
Argument it should be a Constant, not a ConstantExpr.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Look through PHIs, GEPs, IntToPtrs and PtrToInts to expose more constants when comparing GEPs
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the base
pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have complex
pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs, conversions to
or from integers, etc) the value of the original base pointer will be
hidden to the optimizer and this transformation will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the relevant
uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The GEP comparison
will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257164
Limit this transform to a basic block and guard against PHIs.
Hopefully, this fixes the remaining failures in PR25999:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25999
llvm-svn: 257133
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the
base pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have
complex pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs,
conversions to or from integers, etc) the value of the original
base pointer will be hidden to the optimizer and this transformation
will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the
relevant uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The
GEP comparison will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257064
Summary: This patch fixes a bug in prepareICWorklistFromFunction, where the loop becomes infinite with instructions of token type. The patch checks if the instruction is token type, and if so it updates EndInst with the current instruction.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15859
llvm-svn: 256792
a standalone pass.
There is no call graph or even interesting analysis for this part of
function attributes -- it is literally inferring attributes based on the
target library identification. As such, we can do it using a much
simpler module pass that just walks the declarations. This can also
happen much earlier in the pass pipeline which has benefits for any
number of other passes.
In the process, I've cleaned up one particular aspect of the logic which
was necessary in order to separate the two passes cleanly. It now counts
inferred attributes independently rather than just counting all the
inferred attributes as one, and the counts are more clearly explained.
The two test cases we had for this code path are both ... woefully
inadequate and copies of each other. I've kept the superset test and
updated it. We need more testing here, but I had to pick somewhere to
stop fixing everything broken I saw here.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15676
llvm-svn: 256466
Summary: This patch changes gc.statepoint intrinsic's return type to token type instead of i32 type. Using token types could prevent LLVM to merge different gc.statepoint nodes into PHI nodes and cause further problems with gc relocations. The patch also changes the way on how gc.relocate and gc.result look for their corresponding gc.statepoint on unwind path. The current implementation uses the selector value extracted from a { i8*, i32 } landingpad as a hook to find the gc.statepoint, while the patch directly uses a token type landingpad (http://reviews.llvm.org/D15405) to find the gc.statepoint.
Reviewers: sanjoy, JosephTremoulet, pgavlin, igor-laevsky, mjacob
Subscribers: reames, mjacob, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15662
llvm-svn: 256443
This is an extension of the shuffle combining from r203229:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL203229
The idea is to widen a short input vector with undef elements so the
existing shuffle transform for extract/insert can kick in.
The motivation is to finally solve PR2109:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2109
For that example, the IR becomes:
%1 = bitcast <2 x i32>* %P to <2 x float>*
%ld1 = load <2 x float>, <2 x float>* %1, align 8
%2 = shufflevector <2 x float> %ld1, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%i2 = shufflevector <4 x float> %A, <4 x float> %2, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 4, i32 5>
ret <4 x float> %i2
And x86 SSE output improves from:
movq (%rdi), %xmm1 ## xmm1 = mem[0],zero
movdqa %xmm1, %xmm2
shufps $229, %xmm2, %xmm2 ## xmm2 = xmm2[1,1,2,3]
shufps $48, %xmm0, %xmm1 ## xmm1 = xmm1[0,0],xmm0[3,0]
shufps $132, %xmm1, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],xmm1[0,2]
shufps $32, %xmm0, %xmm2 ## xmm2 = xmm2[0,0],xmm0[2,0]
shufps $36, %xmm2, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],xmm2[2,0]
retq
To the almost optimal:
movhpd (%rdi), %xmm0
Note: There's a tension in the existing transform related to generating
arbitrary shufflevector masks. We avoid that in other places in InstCombine
because we're scared that codegen can't handle strange masks, but it looks
like we're ok with producing those here. I purposely chose weird insert/extract
indexes for the regression tests to see the effect in these cases.
For PowerPC+Altivec, AArch64, and X86+SSE/AVX, I think the codegen is equal or
better for these examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15096
llvm-svn: 256394
This extends the same line of reasoning used in EarlyCSE w/http://reviews.llvm.org/D15352 to the DSE implementation in InstCombine.
Key points:
* We only remove unordered or simple stores.
* The loads producing values consumed by dead stores don't influence whether the store is dead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15354
llvm-svn: 255932
Summary:
The LibCallSimplifier will turn llvm.exp2.* intrinsics into ldexp* libcalls
which do not make sense with the AMDGPU backend.
In the long run, we'll want an llvm.ldexp.* intrinsic to properly make use of
this optimization, but this works around the problem for now.
See also: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14327 (suggested llvm.ldexp.* implementation)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92709
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14990
llvm-svn: 255658
For non padded structs, we can just proceed and deaggregate them.
We don't want ot do this when there is padding in the struct as to not
lose information about this padding (the subsequents passes would then
try hard to preserve the padding, which is undesirable).
Also update extractvalue.ll and cast.ll so that they use structs with padding.
Remove the FIXME in the extractvalue of laod case as the non padded case is
handled when processing the load, and we don't want to do it on the padded
case.
Patch by: Amaury SECHET <deadalnix@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14483
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 255600
This patch adds optional fast-math-flags (the same that apply to fmul/fadd/fsub/fdiv/frem/fcmp)
to call instructions in IR. Follow-up patches would use these flags in LibCallSimplifier, add
support to clang, and extend FMF to the DAG for calls.
Motivating example:
%y = fmul fast float %x, %x
%z = tail call float @sqrtf(float %y)
We'd like to be able to optimize sqrt(x*x) into fabs(x). We do this today using a function-wide
attribute for unsafe-math, but we really want to trigger on the instructions themselves:
%z = tail call fast float @sqrtf(float %y)
because in an LTO build it's possible that calls with fast semantics have been inlined into a
function with non-fast semantics.
The code changes and tests are based on the recent commits that added "notail":
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL252368
and added FMF to fcmp:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL241901
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14707
llvm-svn: 255555
This change was discussed in D15392. It allows us to remove the fold that was added
in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/r255261
...and it will allow us to generalize this fold:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL112232
while preserving the order of bitcast + extract that it produces and testing shows
is better handled by the backend.
Note that the existing check for "isVectorTy()" wasn't strong enough in general
and specifically because: x86_mmx. It's not a vector, but it's not vectorizable
either. So here we check VectorType::isValidElementType() directly before
proceeding with the transform.
llvm-svn: 255433
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
This change is discussed in D15392 and should allow us to effectively
revert:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=255261
if we canonicalize bitcasts ahead of extracts.
It should be safe to convert any pair of bitcasts into a single bitcast,
however, it was mentioned here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110829/127089.html
that we're not allowed to bitcast from an x86_mmx to some other types, but I'm
not seeing any failures from that, and we have regression tests in CodeGen/X86
that appear to cover all of those cases.
Some day we'll get to remove that MMX wart from LLVM IR completely?
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15468
llvm-svn: 255399
MatchBSwap has most of the functionality to match bit reversals already. If we switch it from looking at bytes to individual bits and remove a few early exits, we can extend the main recursive function to match any sequence of ORs, ANDs and shifts that assemble a value from different parts of another, base value. Once we have this bit->bit mapping, we can very simply detect if it is appropriate for a bswap or bitreverse.
llvm-svn: 255334
This is a redo of r255137 (reverted at r255227) which was a redo of
r255124 (reverted at r255126) with a fixed check for a scalar source
type and an added test for the failure that caused the revert.
Original commit message:
Example:
bitcast (extractelement (bitcast <2 x float> %X to <2 x i32>), 1) to float
--->
extractelement <2 x float> %X, i32 1
This is part of fixing PR25543:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25543
The next step will be to generalize this fold:
trunc ( lshr ( bitcast X) ) -> extractelement (X)
Ie, I'm hoping to replace the existing transform of:
bitcast ( trunc ( lshr ( bitcast X)))
added by:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL112232
with 2 less specific transforms to catch the case in the bug report.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14879
llvm-svn: 255261
This is a redo of r255124 (reverted at r255126) with an added check for a
scalar destination type and an added test for the failure seen in Clang's
test/CodeGen/vector.c. The extra test shows a different missing optimization.
Original commit message:
Example:
bitcast (extractelement (bitcast <2 x float> %X to <2 x i32>), 1) to float
--->
extractelement <2 x float> %X, i32 1
This is part of fixing PR25543:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25543
The next step will be to generalize this fold:
trunc ( lshr ( bitcast X) ) -> extractelement (X)
Ie, I'm hoping to replace the existing transform of:
bitcast ( trunc ( lshr ( bitcast X)))
added by:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL112232
with 2 less specific transforms to catch the case in the bug report.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14879
llvm-svn: 255137
Example:
bitcast (extractelement (bitcast <2 x float> %X to <2 x i32>), 1) to float
--->
extractelement <2 x float> %X, i32 1
This is part of fixing PR25543:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25543
The next step will be to generalize this fold:
trunc ( lshr ( bitcast X) ) -> extractelement (X)
Ie, I'm hoping to replace the existing transform of:
bitcast ( trunc ( lshr ( bitcast X)))
added by:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL112232
with 2 less specific transforms to catch the case in the bug report.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14879
llvm-svn: 255124
Summary:
There are `SelectPatternFlavor`s that don't represent min or max idioms,
and we should not be passing those to `getCmpPredicateForMinMax`.
Fixes PR25745.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15249
llvm-svn: 254869
Summary:
In order to avoid calling pow function we generate repeated fmul when n is a
positive or negative whole number.
For each exponent we pre-compute Addition Chains in order to minimize the no.
of fmuls.
Refer: http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/achim/addition_chain.html
We pre-compute addition chains for exponents upto 32 (which results in a max of
7 fmuls).
For eg:
4 = 2+2
5 = 2+3
6 = 3+3 and so on
Hence,
pow(x, 4.0) ==> y = fmul x, x
x = fmul y, y
ret x
For negative exponents, we simply compute the reciprocal of the final result.
Note: This transformation is only enabled under fast-math.
Patch by Mandeep Singh Grang <mgrang@codeaurora.org>
Reviewers: weimingz, majnemer, escha, davide, scanon, joerg
Subscribers: probinson, escha, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13994
llvm-svn: 254776
The compiler can take advantage of the allocation/deallocation
function's properties. We knew how to do this for Itanium but had no
support for MSVC-style functions.
llvm-svn: 254656
This one is enabled only under -ffast-math. There are cases where the
difference between the value computed and the correct value is huge
even for ffast-math, e.g. as Steven pointed out:
x = -1, y = -4
log(pow(-1), 4) = 0
4*log(-1) = NaN
I checked what GCC does and apparently they do the same optimization
(which result in the dramatic difference). Future work might try to
make this (slightly) less worse.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14400
llvm-svn: 254263
We had two code paths. One would create names like "foo.1" and the other
names like "foo1".
For globals it is important to use "foo.1" to help C++ name demangling.
For locals there is no strong reason to go one way or the other so I
kept the most common mangling (foo1).
llvm-svn: 253804
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253511
The instruction combiner previously removed types from filter clauses in Landing Pad instructions if the type had previously been seen in a catch clause. This is incorrect and prevents unexpected exception handlers from rethrowing the caught type.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14669
llvm-svn: 253370
The current implementation of GEP visitor in InstCombine fails with assertion on Vector GEP with mix of scalar and vector types, like this:
getelementptr double, double* %a, <8 x i32> %i
(It fails to create a "sext" from <8 x i32> to <8 x i64>)
I fixed it and added some tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14485
llvm-svn: 253162
There are plenty more instcombines we could probably do with bitreverse, but this seems like a very obvious and trivial starting point and was brought up by Hal in his review.
llvm-svn: 252879
FoldPHIArgZextsIntoPHI cannot insert an instruction after the PHI if
there is an EHPad in the BB. Doing so would result in an instruction
inserted after a terminator.
llvm-svn: 252377
We tried to insert a cast of a phi in a block whose terminator is an
EHPad. This is invalid. Do not attempt the transform in these
circumstances.
llvm-svn: 252370
Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.
For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.
This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.
Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.
Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265
llvm-svn: 252219
attribute is not present.
During my refactor in r251595 I changed the behavior of optimizeSqrt(),
skipping the transformation if the function wasn't marked with unsafe-fp-math
attribute. This fixed a bug, as confirmed by Sanjay (before the optimization
was silently executed anyway), although it wasn't my primary aim.
This commit adds a test to ensure the code doesn't break again.
Reported by: Marcello Maggioni
Discussed with: Sanjay Patel
llvm-svn: 251747
Summary:
InstCombine tries to transform GEP(PHI(GEP1, GEP2, ..)) into GEP(GEP(PHI(...))
when possible. However, this may leave the old PHI node around. Even if we
do end up folding the GEPs, having an extra PHI node might not be beneficial.
This change makes the transformation more conservative. We now only do this if
the PHI has only one use, and can therefore be removed after the transformation.
Reviewers: jmolloy, majnemer
Subscribers: mcrosier, mssimpso, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13887
llvm-svn: 251281
First, the motivation: LLVM currently does not realize that:
((2072 >> (L == 0)) >> 7) & 1 == 0
where L is some arbitrary value. Whether you right-shift 2072 by 7 or by 8, the
lowest-order bit is always zero. There are obviously several ways to go about
fixing this, but the generic solution pursued in this patch is to teach
computeKnownBits something about shifts by a non-constant amount. Previously,
we would give up completely on these. Instead, in cases where we know something
about the low-order bits of the shift-amount operand, we can combine (and
together) the associated restrictions for all shift amounts consistent with
that knowledge. As a further generalization, I refactored all of the logic for
all three kinds of shifts to have this capability. This works well in the above
case, for example, because the dynamic shift amount can only be 0 or 1, and
thus we can say a lot about the known bits of the result.
This brings us to the second part of this change: Even when we know all of the
bits of a value via computeKnownBits, nothing used to constant-fold the result.
This introduces the necessary code into InstCombine and InstSimplify. I've
added it into both because:
1. InstCombine won't automatically pick up the associated logic in
InstSimplify (InstCombine uses InstSimplify, but not via the API that
passes in the original instruction).
2. Putting the logic in InstCombine allows the resulting simplifications to become
part of the iterative worklist
3. Putting the logic in InstSimplify allows the resulting simplifications to be
used by everywhere else that calls SimplifyInstruction (inlining, unrolling,
and many others).
And this requires a small change to our definition of an ephemeral value so
that we don't break the rest case from r246696 (where the icmp feeding the
@llvm.assume, is also feeding a br). Under the old definition, the icmp would
not be considered ephemeral (because it is used by the br), but this causes the
assume to remove itself (in addition to simplifying the branch structure), and
it seems more-useful to prevent that from happening.
llvm-svn: 251146
Allow LLVM to optimize the sequence like the following:
%inc = add nsw i32 %i, 1
%cmp = icmp slt %n, %inc
into:
%cmp = icmp sle i32 %n, %i
The case is not handled previously due to the complexity of compuation of %n.
Hence, LLVM cannot swap operands of icmp accordingly.
llvm-svn: 250746
This patch improves support for combining the SSE4A EXTRQ(I) and INSERTQ(I) intrinsics:
1 - Converts INSERTQ/EXTRQ calls to INSERTQI/EXTRQI if the 'bit index' and 'length' operands are constant
2 - Converts INSERTQI/EXTRQI calls to shufflevector if the bit index/length are both byte aligned (we can already lower shuffles to INSERTQI/EXTRQI if its useful)
3 - Constant folding support
4 - Add zeroinitializer handling
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13348
llvm-svn: 250609
This is a cleaned up patch from the one written by John Regehr based on the findings of the Souper superoptimizer.
The basic idea here is that input bits that are known zero reduce the maximum count that the intrinsic could return. We know that the number of bits required to represent a particular count is at most log2(N)+1.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13253
llvm-svn: 250338
As discussed in D13348 - the INSERTQI range combining code is wrong in that it confuses the insertion bit index with an extraction bit index.
The remaining legal combines are very unlikely (especially once we've converted to shuffles in D13348) so I'm removing the optimization.
llvm-svn: 250160
This is a partial fix for PR24886:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24886
Without this IR transform, the backend (x86 at least) was producing inefficient code.
This patch is making 2 assumptions:
1. The canonical form of a fabs() operation is, in fact, the LLVM fabs() intrinsic.
2. The high bit of an FP value is always the sign bit; as noted in the bug report, this isn't specified by the LangRef.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13076
llvm-svn: 249702
This was requested in D13076: if we're going to canonicalize to fabs(), ValueTracking
should know that fabs() clears sign bits.
In this patch (as in D13076), we're not handling vectors yet even though computeKnownBits'
fabs() case itself should be vector-ready via the splat in this patch.
Fixing this will require follow-on patches to correct other logic that uses 'getScalarType'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13222
llvm-svn: 249701
This will allow us to optimize code such as:
int f(int *p) {
int x;
return p == &x;
}
as well as:
int *allocate(void);
int f() {
int x;
int *p = allocate();
return p == &x;
}
The folding can only be done under certain circumstances. Even though p and &x
cannot alias, the comparison must still return true if the pointer
representations are equal. If a user successfully generates a p that's a
correct guess for &x, comparison should return true even though p is an invalid
pointer.
This patch argues that if the address of the alloca isn't observable outside the
function, the function can act as-if the address is impossible to guess from the
outside. The tricky part is keeping the act consistent: if we fold p == &x to
false in one place, we must make sure to fold any other comparisons based on
those pointers similarly. To ensure that, we only fold when &x is involved
exactly once in comparison instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13358
llvm-svn: 249490
This is a cleaned up patch from the one written by John Regehr based on the findings of the Souper superoptimizer.
When writing tests, I was surprised to find that instsimplify apparently doesn't know how to collapse bit test sequences based purely on known bits. This required me to split my tests across both instsimplify and instcombine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13250
llvm-svn: 249453
If the mask of a select instruction is a ConstantVector, method
SimplifyDemandedVectorElts iterates over the mask elements to identify which
values are selected from the select inputs.
Before this patch, method SimplifyDemandedVectorElts always used method
Constant::isNullValue() to check if a value in the mask was zero. Unfortunately
that method always returns false when called on a ConstantExpr.
This patch fixes the problem in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts by adding an explicit
check for ConstantExpr values. Now, if a value in the mask is a ConstantExpr, we
avoid calling isNullValue() on it.
Fixes PR24922.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13219
llvm-svn: 249390
When trying to optimize fortified library functions use the right
location to insert new instructions in order to preserve correct
def-use order.
This fixes an issue where a misplaced instruction definition would
happen to be *after* one of its use after a RAUW, forming invalid IR.
This behavior was introduced by r227250.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13301
rdar://problem/22802369
llvm-svn: 249092
Summary:
Some passes may open up opportunities for optimizations, leaving empty
lifetime start/end ranges. For example, with the following code:
void foo(char *, char *);
void bar(int Size, bool flag) {
for (int i = 0; i < Size; ++i) {
char text[1];
char buff[1];
if (flag)
foo(text, buff); // BBFoo
}
}
the loop unswitch pass will create 2 versions of the loop, one with
flag==true, and the other one with flag==false, but always leaving
the BBFoo basic block, with lifetime ranges covering the scope of the for
loop. Simplify CFG will then remove BBFoo in the case where flag==false,
but will leave the lifetime markers.
This patch teaches InstCombine to remove trivially empty lifetime marker
ranges, that is ranges ending right after they were started (ignoring
debug info or other lifetime markers in the range).
This fixes PR24598: excessive compile time after r234581.
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13305
llvm-svn: 249018
This patch teaches InstCombiner how to convert a SSSE3/AVX2 byte shuffle to a
builtin shuffle if the mask is constant.
Converting byte shuffle intrinsic calls to builtin shuffles can help finding
more opportunities for combining shuffles later on in selection dag.
We may end up with byte shuffles with constant masks as the result of inlining.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13252
llvm-svn: 248913
This commit changes the interface of the vld[1234], vld[234]lane, and vst[1234],
vst[234]lane ARM neon intrinsics and associates an address space with the
pointer that these intrinsics take. This changes, e.g.,
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32(i8*, i32)
to
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32.p0i8(i8*, i32)
This change ensures that address spaces are fully taken into account in the ARM
target during lowering of interleaved loads and stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12985
llvm-svn: 248887
Currently SimplifyDemandedVectorElts can only peek through bitcasts if the vectors have the same number of elements.
This patch fixes and enables some existing (disabled) code to support bitcasting to vectors with more/fewer elements. It currently only accepts cases when vectors alias cleanly (i.e. number of elements are an exact multiple of the other vector).
This was added to improve the demanded vector elements support for SSE vector shifts which require the __m128i (<2 x i64>) argument type to be bitcast to the vector type for the builtin shift. I've added extra tests for various additional bitcasts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12935
llvm-svn: 248784
This is one step towards solving PR24766:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
We were not producing the same IR for these two C functions because the store
to the temp bool causes extra zexts:
#include <stdbool.h>
bool switchy(char x1, char x2, char condition) {
bool conditionMet = false;
switch (condition) {
case 0: conditionMet = (x1 == x2); break;
case 1: conditionMet = (x1 <= x2); break;
}
return conditionMet;
}
bool switchy2(char x1, char x2, char condition) {
switch (condition) {
case 0: return (x1 == x2);
case 1: return (x1 <= x2);
}
return false;
}
As noted in the code comments, this test case manages to avoid the more general existing
phi optimizations where there are only 2 phi inputs or where there are no constant phi
args mixed in with the casts ops. It seems like a corner case, but if we don't catch it,
then I don't think we can get SimplifyCFG to further optimize towards the canonical form
for this function shown in the bug report.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12866
llvm-svn: 248689
Summary:
This is the second part of fixing bug 24848 https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24848.
If both operands of a comparison have range metadata, they should be used to constant fold the comparison.
Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13177
llvm-svn: 248650
This is a fix for PR22723:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22723
My first attempt at this was to change what I thought was the root problem:
xor (zext i1 X to i32), 1 --> zext (xor i1 X, true) to i32
...but we create the opposite pattern in InstCombiner::visitZExt(), so infinite loop!
My next idea was to fix the matchIfNot() implementation in PatternMatch, but that would
mean potentially returning a different size for the match than what was input. I think
this would require all users of m_Not to check the size of the returned match, so I
abandoned that idea.
I settled on just fixing the exact case presented in the PR. This patch does allow the
2 functions in PR22723 to compile identically (x86):
bool test(bool x, bool y) { return !x | !y; }
bool test(bool x, bool y) { return !x || !y; }
...
andb %sil, %dil
xorb $1, %dil
movb %dil, %al
retq
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12705
llvm-svn: 248634
Summary:
This is the first part of fixing bug 24848 https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24848.
When range metadata is provided, it should be used to constant fold comparisons with constant values.
Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12988
llvm-svn: 248402
The SSE4A instructions EXTRQ/INSERTQ only use the lower 64-bits (or less) for many of their input vector operands and all of them have undefined upper 64-bits results.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12680
llvm-svn: 247934
Summary:
`signum(x)` is sometimes implemented as `(x >> 63) | (-x >>> 63)` (for
an `i64` `x`). This change adds a matcher for that pattern, and an
instcombine rule to optimize `signum(x) s< 1`.
Later, we can also consider optimizing:
icmp slt signum(x), 0 --> icmp slt x, 0
icmp sle signum(x), 1 --> true
etc.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12703
llvm-svn: 247846
The patch extends the optimization to cases where the constant's
magnitude is so small or large that the rounding of the conversion
is irrelevant. The "so small" case includes negative zero.
Differential review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11210
llvm-svn: 247708
Summary: This patch replaces isKnownNonNull() with isKnownNonNullAt() when checking nullness of passing arguments at callsite. In this way it can handle cases where the argument does not have nonnull attribute but has a dominating null check from the CFG. It also adds assertions in isKnownNonNull() and isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition() to make sure the value checked is pointer type (as defined in LLVM document). These assertions might trip failures in things which are not covered under llvm/test, but fixes should be pretty obvious.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12779
llvm-svn: 247587
Improved InstCombine support for CVTPH2PS (F16C half 2 float conversion):
<4 x float> @llvm.x86.vcvtph2ps.128(<8 x i16>) - only uses the bottom 4 i16 elements for the conversion.
Added constant folding support.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12731
llvm-svn: 247504
Summary: This patch replaces isKnownNonNull() with isKnownNonNullAt() when checking nullness of passing arguments at callsite. In this way it can handle cases where the argument does not have nonnull attribute but has a dominating null check from the CFG.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12779
llvm-svn: 247356
Summary: This patch replaces isKnownNonNull() with isKnownNonNullAt() when checking nullness of gc.relocate return value. In this way it can handle cases where the relocated value does not have nonnull attribute but has a dominating null check from the CFG.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12772
llvm-svn: 247353
removes cast by performing the lshr on smaller types. However, currently there
is no trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst) variant.
This patch add such optimization by transforming trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst)
to ashr A, Cst.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12520
llvm-svn: 247271
- Move tests only exercising instsimplify to instsimplify's apint-or.ll
- Actually test the CHECK lines in instsimplify's apint-or.ll
- Merge the remaining tests in apint-or1.ll and apint-or2.ll, use FileCheck
llvm-svn: 247045
removes cast by performing the lshr on smaller types. However, currently there
is no trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst) variant.
This patch add such optimization by transforming trunc(lshr (sext A), Cst)
to ashr A, Cst.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12520
llvm-svn: 246997
Trivial multiplication by zero may survive the worklist. We tried to
reassociate the multiplication with a division instruction, causing us
to divide by zero; bail out instead.
This fixes PR24726.
llvm-svn: 246939
As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions
(`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler
check, a verifier check, and bitcode upgrading logic to combat testcase
bitrot after the `DIBuilder` change.
While working on the testcases, I realized that
test/Linker/subprogram-linkonce-weak-odr.ll isn't relevant anymore. Its
purpose was to check for a corner case in PR22792 where two subprogram
definitions match exactly and share the same metadata node. The new
verifier check, requiring that subprogram definitions are 'distinct',
precludes that possibility.
I updated almost all the IR with the following script:
git grep -l -E -e '= !DISubprogram\(.* isDefinition: true' |
grep -v test/Bitcode |
xargs sed -i '' -e 's/= \(!DISubprogram(.*, isDefinition: true\)/= distinct \1/'
Likely some variant of would work for out-of-tree testcases.
llvm-svn: 246327
PR24605 is caused due to an incorrect insert point in instcombine's IR
builder. When simplifying
%t = add X Y
...
%m = icmp ... %t
the replacement for %t should be placed before %t, not before %m, as
there could be a use of %t between %t and %m.
llvm-svn: 246315
Globals in address spaces other than one may have 0 as a valid address,
so we should not assume that they can be null.
Reviewed by Philip Reames.
llvm-svn: 246137
The original checkin was buggy, this change has a fix.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0
Summary:
This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:
1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.
This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210
llvm-svn: 245753
Summary:
This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:
1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.
This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210
llvm-svn: 245635
Summary: We know that -x & 1 is equivalent to x & 1, avoid using negation for testing if a negative integer is even or odd.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: junbuml, mssimpso, gberry, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12156
llvm-svn: 245569
If we can ignore NaNs, fmin/fmax libcalls can become compare and select
(this is what we turn std::min / std::max into).
This IR should then be optimized in the backend to whatever is best for
any given target. Eg, x86 can use minss/maxss instructions.
This should solve PR24314:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24314
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11866
llvm-svn: 245187
Bitwise arithmetic can obscure a simple sign-test. If replacing the
mask with a truncate is preferable if the type is legal because it
permits us to rephrase the comparison more explicitly.
llvm-svn: 245171
If <src> is non-zero we can safely set the flag to true, and this
results in less code generated for, e.g. ffs(x) + 1 on FreeBSD.
Thanks to majnemer for suggesting the fix and reviewing.
Code generated before the patch was applied:
0: 0f bc c7 bsf %edi,%eax
3: b9 20 00 00 00 mov $0x20,%ecx
8: 0f 45 c8 cmovne %eax,%ecx
b: 83 c1 02 add $0x2,%ecx
e: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
13: 85 ff test %edi,%edi
15: 0f 45 c1 cmovne %ecx,%eax
18: c3 retq
Code generated after the patch was applied:
0: 0f bc cf bsf %edi,%ecx
3: 83 c1 02 add $0x2,%ecx
6: 85 ff test %edi,%edi
8: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
d: 0f 45 c1 cmovne %ecx,%eax
10: c3 retq
It seems we can still use cmove and save another 'test' instruction, but
that can be tackled separately.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11989
llvm-svn: 244947
Consider this code:
BB:
%i = phi i32 [ 0, %if.then ], [ %c, %if.else ]
%add = add nsw i32 %i, %b
...
In this common case the add can be moved to the %if.else basic block, because
adding zero is an identity operation. If we go though %if.then branch it's
always a win, because add is not executed; if not, the number of instructions
stays the same.
This pattern applies also to other instructions like sub, shl, shr, ashr | 0,
mul, sdiv, div | 1.
Patch by Jakub Kuderski!
llvm-svn: 244887
Most SSE/AVX (non-constant) vector shift instructions only use the lower 64-bits of the 128-bit shift amount vector operand, this patch calls SimplifyDemandedVectorElts to optimize for this.
I had to refactor some of my recent InstCombiner work on the vector shifts to avoid quite a bit of duplicate code, it means that SimplifyX86immshift now (re)decodes the type of shift.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11938
llvm-svn: 244872
As discussed in D11886, this patch moves the SSE/AVX vector blend folding to instcombiner from PerformINTRINSIC_WO_CHAINCombine (which allows us to remove this completely).
InstCombiner already had partial support for this, I just had to add support for zero (ConstantAggregateZero) masks and also the case where both selection inputs were the same (allowing us to ignore the mask).
I also moved all the relevant combine tests into InstCombine/blend_x86.ll
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11934
llvm-svn: 244723
`InstCombiner::OptimizeOverflowCheck` was asserting an
invariant (operands to binary operations are ordered by decreasing
complexity) that wasn't really an invariant. Fix this by instead having
`InstCombiner::OptimizeOverflowCheck` establish the invariant if it does
not hold.
llvm-svn: 244676
I incorrectly wrote CHECK-NEXT with followin with ':', the check was
ignored by FileCheck.
The non-inbound GEP is folded here because the DataLayout is no longer
optional, the fold was originally guarded with a comment that said:
We need TD information to know the pointer size unless this is inbounds.
Now we always have "TD information" and perform the fold.
Thanks Jonathan Roelofs for noticing.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 244613
The select pattern recognition in ValueTracking (as used by InstCombine
and SelectionDAGBuilder) only knew about integer patterns. This teaches
it about minimum and maximum operations.
matchSelectPattern() has been extended to return a struct containing the
existing Flavor and a new enum defining the pattern's behavior when
given one NaN operand.
C minnum() is defined to return the non-NaN operand in this case, but
the idiomatic C "a < b ? a : b" would return the NaN operand.
ARM and AArch64 at least have different instructions for these different cases.
llvm-svn: 244580
As discussed in D11760, this patch moves the (V)PSRA(WD) arithmetic shift-by-constant folding to InstCombine to match the logical shift implementations.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11886
llvm-svn: 244495
Philip Reames