This change is done to see whether all platforms have a CI with the
Japanese locale installed.
This wires in the locale in the tests and uses it in one test. This is
a preparation for the tests of the chrono formatters.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122738
Adds a `__get_container` member as suggested by @Quuxplusone in D110497.
Includes s/_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY/_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI/.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110573
Before implementing P2216's format-string adjust the unit tests.
After P2216 the format* functions require a compile-time string literal.
This changes prepares the tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122534
`__is_callable` is required to ensure that the classic algorithms are only called with functions or functors. I also begin to granularize `<type_traits>`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123114
We are introducing branchless variants for sort3, sort4 and sort5.
These sorting functions have been generated using Reinforcement
Learning and aim to replace __sort3, __sort4 and __sort5 variants
for integral types.
The libc++ benchmarks were run on isolated machines for Skylake, ARM and
AMD architectures and achieve statistically significant improvement in
sorting random integers on test cases from sort1 to sort262144 for
uint32 and uint64.
A full performance overview for Intel Skylake, AMD and Arm can be
found here: https://bit.ly/3AtesYf
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik
Spies: daniel.mankowitz, mgrang, Quuxplusone, andreamichi, philnik, libcxx-commits, nilayvaish, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118029
Introduce _LIBCPP_ASSERTIONS_DISABLE_ASSUME which makes _LIBCPP_ASSERT
not call __builtin_assume when _LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS == 0.
Calling __builtin_assume was introduced in D122397.
__builtin_assume is generally supposed to improve optimizations, but can
cause regressions when LLVM has trouble handling the calls to
`llvm.assume()` (see comments in D122397).
Reviewed By: philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123175
There are `constexpr` versions for the different `__invoke` functions, which seem to be identical other than begin `constexpr` since C++11 instead of being `constexpr` since C++20.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123003
There are no such markings left - all of them have been fixed or
analyzed.
This closes llvm.org/PR32730 (github issue #32077).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123145
The is a followup of D116965 to split the calendar header. This is a
preparation to add the formatters for the chrono header.
The code is only moved no other changes have been made.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122995
This patch implements P0674R1, i.e. support for arrays in std::make_shared
and std::allocate_shared.
Co-authored-by: Zoe Carver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62641
On Windows, like on macOS and FreeBSD, widening char(-5) in the
"C" locale succeeds and produces L'\u00fb'.
Switch widen_many to test \xfb instead of \x85; the mingw
version of btowc widens \x85 in the "C" locale into
\u2026 (which is the corresponding character according to the
Windows-1252 codepage), while Microsoft CRT's btowc widens it
into \u0085 (just like macOS and FreeBSD). Switch this to test \xfb
which is the character tested by the widen_1 test (as `char(-5)`),
which gets handled the same by all Windows implementations of btowc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121003
[libc++] add global variable template std::views::empty
Note it is neither a range adaptor, nor a CPO. It is simplify a global variable template.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122996
This iterator is used to test code that only needs to satisfy the
output_iterator concept. Follow-up changes will use this iterator in
older language Standards.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122072
Instead of using `.fail.cpp` tests, use `.verify.cpp` to check for the
exact reason of the failure. In the case of deduction guides, use SFINAE
based tests instead since that is our preferred way of testing those.
Finally, ensure that we actually run the test in `iter_alloc_deduction.pass.cpp`,
since we were not running anything before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123055
Note that `generate_assertion_tests.py` will be renamed to
`generate_header_tests.py` separately to facilitate change tracking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123000
The pointer.volatile.pass.cpp test was already marked as XFAIL for
mingw-dll (for reasons explained in the comment above it).
The same issue also appears in clang-cl-dll when built with newer
CMake versions. (It didn't appear with older versions of CMake, as
CMake built the library with the clang-cl flag `-std:c++latest` when
we've requested C++ 20 - which practically built it in c++2b mode with
current clang versions. With current versions of CMake, it passes
`-std:c++20` instead.)
As it succeeds/fails dependent on factors we don't
directly control, mark it as UNSUPPORTED instead of XFAIL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122718
It seems to have been added back in 761e42fa3d for Clang to use it,
however it seems to have never been used for that purpose, so it is
probably fine to remove it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122330
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
Since we expect the condition to be true most of the time, we might
as well tell the compiler. And when assertions are disabled, we
might as well tell the compiler that it's allowed to assume that
the condition holds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122397
This means that re-running with llvm-lit in that configuration will
work as expected. This also enables assertions in libc++abi in the
Generic-assertions CI job, which was disabled previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122597
Instead of using a temporary `string` in `__vformat_to_wrapped` use a new
generic iterator. This aids to reduce the number of template instantions
and avoids using a `string` to buffer the entire formatted output.
This changes the type of `format_context` and `wformat_context`, this can
still be done since the code isn't ABI stable yet.
Several approaches have been evaluated:
- Using a __output_buffer base class with:
- a put function to store the buffer in its internal buffer
- a virtual flush function to copy the internal buffer to the output
- Using a `function` to forward the output operation to the output buffer,
much like the next method.
- Using a type erased function point to store the data in the buffer.
The last version resulted in the best performance. For some cases there's
still a loss of speed over the original method. This loss many becomes
apparent when large strings are copied to a pointer like iterator, before
the compiler optimized this using `memcpy`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110495
This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be
overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`.
This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing
the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969
(which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only).
This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches.
Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic,
yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when
deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in
the dylib.
As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility
with the previous debug mode:
- Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions
in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but
those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support.
- Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function
and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is
because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to.
- Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop
compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users
will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion
handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is
very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable.
The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with
assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion
handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily
fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining
the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to
let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is
actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would
otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D121626 for details -- this re-enables the
CTAD we removed, since it does break some stuff as well (even though it's
not nearly as bad as the removed constructors fixed by D121626).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122184
The test fails on AIX due to it expecting an error as on Linux. However, as on
other non-Linux systems symlinks permissions are supported so expect an empty
error code.
Reviewed By: daltenty, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121140
These are the last™ changes to the tests for constexpr preparation.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, Mordante
Spies: Mordante, EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120951
Before it only accepted one output iterator type. Now it accepts all
output iterator types as required by BasicFormatter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120916
Addresses LWG 3548 which mandates that when shared_ptr is being constructed from a unique_ptr, the unique_ptr's deleter should be moved and not copied.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119159
Changes in [P0896](https://wg21.link/p0896):
- add `disable_sized_sentinel_for`;
- add `iter_move` and `iter_swap`;
- add a `requires` clause to the `operator->`;
- add `iterator_concept`;
- check that the `Iterator` template parameter is a bidirectional
iterator;
- add constraints to all comparison operators;
- change the definitions of `iterator_category`, `value_type`,
`difference_type` and `reference` (changes to `iterator_category` were
already implemented).
Also add a few forgotten things to the `reverse_iterator` synopsis
(notably the spaceship operator).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120180
This tests the same QoI issue as the existing STL Classic test,
but for the Ranges algorithms. Also, do the same thing for all
the algorithms that take projections.
I found a few missing algorithms and added them to the existing test, too. `std::find_first_of` currently fails; I should look at why that is (and in particular, what is it doing weird that //makes// it inconsistent with the entire rest of libc++?).
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121265
Louis Dionne