by the SRoA "promote to large integer" code, eliminating
some type conversions like this:
%94 = zext i16 %93 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
%96 = lshr i32 %94, 8 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%101 = trunc i32 %96 to i8 ; <i8> [#uses=1]
This also unblocks other xforms from happening, now clang is able to compile:
struct S { float A, B, C, D; };
float foo(struct S A) { return A.A + A.B+A.C+A.D; }
into:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm0, %xmm2
movdqa %xmm1, %xmm3
addss %xmm2, %xmm3
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm0
addss %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
on x86-64, instead of:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
movd %xmm0, %rax
shrq $32, %rax
movd %eax, %xmm2
addss %xmm0, %xmm2
movapd %xmm1, %xmm3
addss %xmm2, %xmm3
movd %xmm1, %rax
shrq $32, %rax
movd %eax, %xmm0
addss %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
This seems pretty close to optimal to me, at least without
using horizontal adds. This also triggers in lots of other
code, including SPEC.
llvm-svn: 112278
instead of trying to maintain the real frame list (unwind frames) and an
inline frame list. The information is cheap to produce when we already have
looked up a block and was making stack frame uniquing difficult when trying
to use the previous stack when making the current stack.
We now maintain the previous value object lists for common frames between
a previous and current frames so we will be able to tell when variable values
change.
llvm-svn: 112277
and process. Added comment within the file about issues of using LaunchProcess
of SBTarget to launch a process (rdar://problem/8364687).
llvm-svn: 112276
a message send to "super" from a method that appears to be meant to
override a superclass method (same kind, same selector, same argument
types), provide a "super" completion that fills in the selector along
with forwarding the method's arguments (as placeholders).
llvm-svn: 112263
an '&' expression from the second caller of ActOnIdExpression.
Teach template argument deduction that an overloaded id-expression
doesn't give a valid type for deduction purposes to a non-static
member function unless the expression has the correct syntactic
form.
Teach ActOnIdExpression that it shouldn't try to create implicit
member expressions for '&function', because this isn't a
permitted form of use for member functions.
Teach CheckAddressOfOperand to diagnose these more carefully.
Some of these cases aren't reachable right now because earlier
diagnostics interrupt them.
llvm-svn: 112258
The Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.30319.01
implements parts of C++0x based on the draft standard. An old version of
the draft had a bug that makes std::pair<T1*, T2*>(something, 0) fail to
compile. This is because the template<class U, class V> pair(U&& x, V&& y)
constructor is selected, even though it later fails to implicitly convert
U and V to frist_type and second_type.
This has been fixed in n3090, but it seems that Microsoft is not going to
update msvc.
llvm-svn: 112257
The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data
belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients
to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled
function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser
state.
Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and
used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from
ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring
are:
- reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that
declares methods that any client must expose to the
expression parser,
- moving the code specific to implementing the "expr"
command from ClangExpression and
CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression,
a new class,
- moving the common parser interaction code from
ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new
class, and
- making ClangFunction rely only on
ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the
internal implementation of ClangExpression.
Side effects include:
- the compiler interaction code has been factored
out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass
(ASTStructExtractor),
- the header file for ClangFunction is now fully
documented,
- several bugs that only popped up when Clang was
deallocated (which never happened, since the
lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite)
are now fixed, and
- the developer-only "call" command has been
disabled.
I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C
step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and
ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they
work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or
poor documentation.
llvm-svn: 112249
bt all
show the backtrace for all threads, and:
bt 1 3 4
show the backtrace for threads 1, 3 and 4. If we want to come up with some fancier syntax for thread lists later, that will be great, but this will do for now.
llvm-svn: 112248
One who seeks the Tao unlearns something new every day.
Less and less remains until you arrive at non-action.
When you arrive at non-action,
nothing will be left undone.
llvm-svn: 112244
Chris Lattner