Third time's the charm.
This was reverted in r363220 due to being suspected of an internal benchmark
regression and a test failure, none of which turned out to be caused by this.
llvm-svn: 363529
We have observed some failures with internal builds with this revision.
- Performance regressions:
- llvm's SingleSource/Misc evalloop shows performance regressions (although these may be red herrings).
- Benchmarks for Abseil's SwissTable.
- Correctness:
- Failures for particular libicu tests when building the Google AppEngine SDK (for PHP).
hwennborg has already been notified, and is aware of reproducer failures.
llvm-svn: 363220
This was reverted in r360086 as it was supected of causing mysterious test
failures internally. However, it was never concluded that this patch was the
root cause.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 361811
This reverts r357452 (git commit 21eb771dcb).
This was causing strange optimization-related test failures on an internal test. Will followup with more details offline.
llvm-svn: 360086
The original commit caused false positives from AddressSanitizer's
use-after-scope checks, which have now been fixed in r358478.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 358483
This revision causes tests to fail under ASAN. Since the cause of the failures
is not clear (could be ASAN, could be a Clang bug, could be a bug in this
revision), the safest course of action seems to be to revert while investigating.
llvm-svn: 357667
The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
"instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
the need to special-case stores.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 357452
Add an option to allow easier experimentation by target maintainers with the
minimum number of entries to create jump tables. Also clarify the name of
the other existing option governing the creation of jump tables.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25883
llvm-svn: 285104
Evandro Menezes