instead of _Unwind_Resume. With SJLJ exceptions, this is spelled
"_Unwind_SjLj_Resume_or_Rethrow", not "_Unwind_SjLj_Resume", which has
significantly different semantics.
We should actually never be generating a call to _Unwind_SjLj_Resume directly;
even if we were generating true cleanups (which we aren't because of the
horrible hack), we should be calling __cxa_end_cleanup() on ARM. I
haven't implemented this because there's little point as long as the HH is
present.
I believe this fixes <rdar://problem/8281377>.
llvm-svn: 110851
where we weren't accounting for the possibility that a @finally block might
have internal cleanups and therefore might write to the cleanup destination slot.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8293901>.
llvm-svn: 110760
an lvalue of another, compatible Objective-C object type (e.g., a
subclass). Introduce a new initialization sequence step kind to
describe this binding, along with a new cast kind. Fixes PR7741.
llvm-svn: 110513
to avoid the awesome-but-wrong-in-this-case assertion in the canon EAC.
Fixes PR7834.
Also fix a subtle address-space bug in the memset path.
llvm-svn: 110511
This takes some trickery since CastExpr has subclasses (and indeed,
is abstract).
Also, smoosh the CastKind into the bitfield from Expr.
Drops two words of storage from Expr in the common case of expressions
which don't need inheritance paths. Avoids a separate allocation and
another word of overhead in cases needing inheritance paths. Also has
the advantage of not leaking memory, since destructors for AST nodes are
never run.
llvm-svn: 110507
__overflow_handler entrypoint that David Chisnall made up.
Calling __overflow_handler is not part of the contract of
-ftrapv provided by GCC, and should never have been checked
in in the first place.
According to:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/8699
David is using this for some of arbitrary precision integer stuff
or something, which is not an appropriate thing to implement on
this.
llvm-svn: 110490
do the right thing with mixed-visibility symbols, so disable the visibility
optimization where that's possible, i.e. with template classes (since it's
possible that an arbitrary template might be subject to an explicit
instantiation elsewhere). 447.dealII actually does this.
I've put the code under an option that's currently not hooked up to anything.
llvm-svn: 110374
functions with in-line definitions, since such thunks will be emitted at any
use of the function.
Completes the feature work for rdar://problem/7523229.
llvm-svn: 110285
Apply hidden visibility to most RTTI; libstdc++ does not rely on exact
pointer equality for the type info (just the type info names). Apply
the same optimization to RTTI that we do to vtables.
Fixes PR5962.
llvm-svn: 110192
ObjC exceptions:
- don't enter a try for the catch blocks unless there's a finally
- put the setjmp buffer in the locals set for liveness reasons
- dump the sync object into an alloca in the locals set for liveness reasons
Some of this can go away if the backend starts to properly calculate liveness
in the presence of setjmp (which would also be a *much* stabler solution).
llvm-svn: 110188
the magic of inline assembly. Essentially we use read and write hazards
on the set of local variables to force flushing locals to memory
immediately before any protected calls and to inhibit optimizing locals
across the setjmp->catch edge. Fixes rdar://problem/8160285
llvm-svn: 109960
The X86-64 ABI code didn't handle the case when a struct
would get classified and turn up as "NoClass INTEGER" for
example. This is perfectly possible when the first slot
is all padding (e.g. due to empty base classes). In this
situation, the first 8-byte doesn't take a register at all,
only the second 8-byte does.
This fixes this by enhancing the x86-64 abi stuff to allow
and handle this case, reverts the broken fix for PR5831,
and enhances the target independent stuff to be able to
handle an argument value in registers being accessed at an
offset from the memory value.
This is the last x86-64 calling convention related miscompile
that I'm aware of.
llvm-svn: 109848
sections on", this change uncovered a possible linker bug which resulted in the
wrong messages getting dispatched. Backing this out while we investigate...
llvm-svn: 109817
John McCall