Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Kirth bac6cd5bf8 [misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.

New checks rely on 2 invariants:

1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
   populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.

2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
   lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.

These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.

Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
2022-04-19 21:23:48 +00:00
Jorge Gorbe Moya fc7573f29c Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics"
This reverts commit 46774df307.
2022-03-31 14:54:41 -07:00
Paul Kirth 46774df307 [misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.

New checks rely on 2 invariants:

1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
   populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.

2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
   lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.

These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.

Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
2022-03-31 17:38:21 +00:00
Paul Kirth 90cb325abd Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics"
This reverts commit 2add3fbd97.
2022-03-29 06:20:30 +00:00
Paul Kirth 6c77972bac Revert "[docs][misexpect][NFC] Fix malformed table in docs"
This reverts commit a427e18896.
2022-03-29 06:19:53 +00:00
Paul Kirth a427e18896 [docs][misexpect][NFC] Fix malformed table in docs
Reviewed By: abrachet

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122623
2022-03-29 00:14:07 +00:00
Paul Kirth 2add3fbd97 [misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.

New checks rely on 2 invariants:

1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
   populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.

2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
   lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.

These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.

Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
2022-03-28 23:30:04 +00:00
Paul Kirth 964398ccb1 Revert "Revert "Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics"""
This reverts commit 6cf560d69a.
2022-03-18 00:21:33 +00:00
Paul Kirth 6cf560d69a Revert "Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics""
I mistakenly reverted my commit, so I'm relanding it.

This reverts commit 10866a1df4.
2022-03-18 00:04:22 +00:00
Paul Kirth 10866a1df4 Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics"
This reverts commit e7749d4713.
2022-03-17 23:54:26 +00:00
Paul Kirth e7749d4713 [misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.

New checks rely on 2 invariants:

1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
   populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.

2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
   lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.

These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.

Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
2022-03-17 23:46:23 +00:00