Dummy is a word with inappropriate associations. This patch updates the
references to it in clangd code base with more precise ones.
The only user-visible change is the default variable name used when extracting a
variable. It will be named as `placeholder` from now on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99065
Clangd uses codecompletion limit as the limit for workspacesymbols, so
in theory this should only be an order of magnitude slower than a
codecompletion request with empty identifier (as code completion limits
the available symbols).
This is also what LSP suggests "Clients may send an empty string here to request all symbols.".
Clangd doesn't really fulfill the "all" part of that statement, but we
never do unless user set the index query limit to zero explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97773
Browsing macro-generated symbols is confusing.
On the one hand, it seems very *useful* to be able to see the summary of
symbols that were generated.
On the other hand, some macros spew a lot of confusing symbols into the
namespace and when used repeatedly (ABSL_FLAG) can create a lot of spam
that's hard to navigate.
Design constraints:
- the macro expansion tree need not align with the AST, though it often
does in practice.
We address this by defining the nesting based on the *primary*
location of decls, rather than their ranges.
- DocumentSymbol.children[*].range should nest within DocumentSymbol.range
(This constraint is not in LSP "breadcrumbs" breaks without it)
We adjust macro ranges so they cover their "children", rather than
just the macro expansion
- LSP does not have a "macro expansion" symbolkind, nor does it allow a
symbol to have no kind. I've arbitrarily picked "null" as this is
unlikely to conflict with anything useful.
This patch makes all macros and children visible for simplicity+consistency,
though in some cases it may be better to elide the macro node.
We may consider adding heuristics for this in future (e.g. when it expands
to one decl only?) but it doesn't seem clear-cut to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97615
- Categories will now show up as `MyClass(Category)` instead of
`Category` and `MyCategory()` instead of `(anonymous)` in document
symbols
- Methods will now be shown as `-selector:` or `+selector:`
instead of `selector:` to differentiate between instance and class
methods in document symbols
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96612
NameMatch could be a float close to zero, in such cases we were
dividing by zero and moreover propogating a "NaN" to clients, which is invalid
per JSON.
This fixes the issue by only using Quality scores whenever the NameMatch is low,
as we do in CodeCompletion ranking.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/648.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94755
Both `SymbolKind` and `indexSymbolKindToSymbolKind` support constructors and
separate them into a different category from regular methods.
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89935
This will enable queries like "clangd::" to find symbols under clangd
namespace, without requiring full "clang::clangd::" qualification.
Since Fuzzyfind performs the search under all scopes and only boosts the symbols
from relevant namespaces, we might get symbols from non-matching namespaces.
This patch chooses to drop those as they clearly do not match the query.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/550.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88814
The protocol doesn't really incorporate ranking.
As with code completion, most clients respect what the server sends, but
VSCode re-ranks items, with predictable results.
See https://github.com/clangd/vscode-clangd/issues/81
There's no filterText field so we may be unable to construct a good workaround.
But expose the score so we may be able to do this on the client in future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88844
Since we have 2 scoring functions (heuristics and decision forest),
renaming the existing evaluate() function to be more descriptive of the
Heuristics being evaluated in it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88431
It is necessary to traverse children of unnamed declaration contexts
to get symbols which are currently missing in document outline, e.g.:
extern "C" {
void foo();
}
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84839
Summary:
DocumentSymbol ranges were not previously tested and, as a result, had invalid
end location. This patch addresses the issue.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83668
Summary:
This facilitates performing go-to-definition in contexts where AST-based
resolution does not work, such as comments, string literals, preprocessor
disabled regions, and macro definitions, based on textual lookup in the index.
Partially fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/241
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72874
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
`findName` was always used in conjuction with `spellingLocIfSpelled`.
This patch replaces patterns of the form:
spellingLocIfSpelled(findName(&ND), SM)
With a new helper function:
nameLocation(ND, SM)
And removes `spellingLocIfSpelled` and `findName`. Both are never used
anywhere else and the latter is an equivalent of `Decl::getLocation` if
we ever need it again.
This much better reflects what is (now) in this header.
Maybe a rename to ParsedTU would be an improvement, but that's a much
more invasive change and life is too short.
ClangdUnit is dead, long live ClangdUnitTests!
llvm-svn: 370862
Summary:
This builds on the relations support added in D59407, D62459, D62471,
and D62839 to implement type hierarchy subtypes.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman,
jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58880
llvm-svn: 363506
Summary:
The hope is this will catch a few patterns with repetition:
SomeClass* S = ^SomeClass::Create()
int getFrobnicator() { return ^frobnicator_; }
// discard the factory, it's no longer valid.
^MyFactory.reset();
Without triggering antipatterns too often:
return Point(x.first, x.^second);
I'm going to gather some data on whether this turns out to be a win overall.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61537
llvm-svn: 360030
Summary:
Last part of re-landing rC356541. Puts TemplateArgumentsList into
responses of the above mentioned two requests.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59641
llvm-svn: 358274
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Summary:
File paths in URIForFile can come from index or local AST. Path from
index goes through URI transformation and the final path is resolved by URI
scheme and could be potentially different from the original path. Hence, we
should do the same transformation for all paths. We do this in URIForFile, which
now converts a path to URI and back to a canonicalized path.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54845
llvm-svn: 347739
Standardize on the most common namespace setup in our *.cpp files:
using namespace llvm;
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(StringRef) { ... }
And remove redundant llvm:: qualifiers. (Except for cases like
make_unique where this causes problems with std:: and ADL).
This choice is pretty arbitrary, but some broad consistency is nice.
This is going to conflict with everything. Sorry :-/
Squash the other configurations:
A)
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace clangd;
void clangd::foo(StringRef);
This is in some of the older files. (It prevents accidentally defining a
new function instead of one in the header file, for what that's worth).
B)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(llvm::StringRef) { ... }
This is fine, but in practice the using directive often gets added over time.
C)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm; // inside the namespace
This was pretty common, but is a bit misleading: name lookup preferrs
clang::clangd::foo > clang::foo > llvm:: foo (no matter where the using
directive is).
llvm-svn: 344850
Summary:
This would buy us more memory. Using a 32-bits integer is enough for
most human-readable source code (up to 4M lines and 4K columns).
Previsouly, we used 8 bytes for a position, now 4 bytes, it would save
us 8 bytes for each Ref and each Symbol instance.
For LLVM-project binary index file, we save ~13% memory.
| Before | After |
| 412MB | 355MB |
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53363
llvm-svn: 344735
As discussed during D51860 review, it is better to use `llvm::Optional`
here as it has clear semantics which reflect intended behavior.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52028
llvm-svn: 342138
Summary:
When compile_commands.json contains some source files expressed as
relative paths, we can get duplicate responses to findDefinitions. The
responses only differ by the URI, which are different versions of the
same file:
"result": [
{
...
"uri": "file:///home/emaisin/src/ls-interact/cpp-test/build/../src/first.h"
},
{
...
"uri": "file:///home/emaisin/src/ls-interact/cpp-test/src/first.h"
}
]
In getAbsoluteFilePath, we try to obtain the realpath of the FileEntry
by calling tryGetRealPathName. However, this can fail and return an
empty string. It may be bug a bug in clang, but in any case we should
fall back to computing it ourselves if it happens.
I changed getAbsoluteFilePath so that if tryGetRealPathName succeeds, we
return right away (a real path is always absolute). Otherwise, we try
to build an absolute path, as we did before, but we also call
VFS->getRealPath to make sure to get the canonical path (e.g. without
any ".." in it).
Reviewers: malaperle
Subscribers: hokein, ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48687
llvm-svn: 339483
Summary:
log() is split into four functions:
- elog()/log()/vlog() have different severity levels, allowing filtering
- dlog() is a lazy macro which uses LLVM_DEBUG - it logs to the logger, but
conditionally based on -debug-only flag and is omitted in release builds
All logging functions use formatv-style format strings now, e.g:
log("Could not resolve URI {0}: {1}", URI, Result.takeError());
Existing log sites have been split between elog/log/vlog by best guess.
This includes a workaround for passing Error to formatv that can be
simplified when D49170 or similar lands.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49008
llvm-svn: 336785
Summary:
An AST-based approach is used to retrieve the document symbols rather than an
in-memory index query. The index is not an ideal fit to achieve this because of
the file-centric query being done here whereas the index is suited for
project-wide queries. Document symbols also includes more symbols and need to
keep the order as seen in the file.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Andre Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com>
Subscribers: tomgr, ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47846
llvm-svn: 336386
Summary:
Some URI schemes require a hint path to be provided, and workspace root
path seems to be a good fit.
Reviewers: sammccall, malaperle
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48290
llvm-svn: 335035
Summary:
This is a basic implementation of the "workspace/symbol" request which is
used to find symbols by a string query. Since this is similar to code completion
in terms of result, this implementation reuses the "fuzzyFind" in order to get
matches. For now, the scoring algorithm is the same as code completion and
improvements could be done in the future.
The index model doesn't contain quite enough symbols for this to cover
common symbols like methods, enum class enumerators, functions in unamed
namespaces, etc. The index model will be augmented separately to achieve this.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: jkorous, hokein, simark, sammccall, klimek, mgorny, ilya-biryukov, mgrang, jkorous-apple, ioeric, MaskRay, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44882
llvm-svn: 330637
Kadir Cetinkaya