has no stores between the load and the end of block. This works
great and sinks hundreds of stores, but we can't turn it on because
machineinstrs don't have volatility information and we don't want to
sink volatile stores :(
llvm-svn: 45894
parameter, even if it is a varargs function. Do
allow attributes on the varargs part of a call,
but not beyond the last argument. Only allow
selected attributes to be on the varargs part of
a call (currently only 'byval' is allowed). The
reasoning here is that most attributes, eg inreg,
simply make no sense here.
llvm-svn: 45887
get away with it, which exposes opportunities to eliminate the memory
objects entirely. For example, we now compile byval.ll to:
define internal void @f1(i32 %b.0, i64 %b.1) {
entry:
%tmp2 = add i32 %b.0, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=0]
ret void
}
define i32 @main() nounwind {
entry:
call void @f1( i32 1, i64 2 )
ret i32 0
}
This seems like it would trigger a lot for code that passes around small
structs (e.g. SDOperand's or _Complex)...
llvm-svn: 45886
- struct_2.ll: Completely unaligned load/store testing
- call_indirect.ll, struct_1.ll: Add test lines to exercise
X-form [$reg($reg)] addressing
At this point, loads and stores should be under control (he says
in an optimistic tone of voice.)
llvm-svn: 45882
commit all arguments where moved to the stack slot where they would
reside on a normal function call before the lowering to the tail call
stack slot. This was done to prevent arguments overwriting each other.
Now only arguments sourcing from a FORMAL_ARGUMENTS node or a
CopyFromReg node with virtual register (could also be a caller's
argument) are lowered indirectly.
--This line, and those below, will be ignored--
M X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
M X86/README.txt
llvm-svn: 45867
- Cleaned up custom load/store logic, common code is now shared [see note
below], cleaned up address modes
- More test cases: various intrinsics, structure element access (load/store
test), updated target data strings, indirect function calls.
Note: This patch contains a refactoring of the LoadSDNode and StoreSDNode
structures: they now share a common base class, LSBaseSDNode, that
provides an interface to their common functionality. There is some hackery
to access the proper operand depending on the derived class; otherwise,
to do a proper job would require finding and rearranging the SDOperands
sent to StoreSDNode's constructor. The current refactor errs on the
side of being conservatively and backwardly compatible while providing
functionality that reduces redundant code for targets where loads and
stores are custom-lowered.
llvm-svn: 45851
Chris Lattner