strchr("123!", C) != nullptr is a common pattern to check if C is one
of 1, 2, 3 or !. If the largest element of the string is smaller than
the target's register size we can easily create a bitfield and just
do a simple test for set membership.
int foo(char C) { return strchr("123!", C) != nullptr; } now becomes
cmpl $64, %edi ## range check
sbbb %al, %al
movabsq $0xE000200000001, %rcx
btq %rdi, %rcx ## bit test
sbbb %cl, %cl
andb %al, %cl ## and the two conditions
andb $1, %cl
movzbl %cl, %eax ## returning an int
ret
(imho the backend should expand this into a series of branches, but
that's a different story)
The code is currently limited to bit fields that fit in a register, so
usually 64 or 32 bits. Sadly, this misses anything using alpha chars
or {}. This could be fixed by just emitting a i128 bit field, but that
can generate really ugly code so we have to find a better way. To some
degree this is also recreating switch lowering logic, but we can't
simply emit a switch instruction and thus change the CFG within
instcombine.
llvm-svn: 232902
This does not require -ffast-math, and it gives CSE/GVN more options to
eliminate duplicate expressions in, e.g.:
return ((x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - 0.1234 * y));
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4904
llvm-svn: 216169
This reverts commit r204912, and follow-up commit r204948.
This introduced a performance regression, and the fix is not completely
clear yet.
llvm-svn: 205010
when X has multiple uses. This is useful for exposing secondary optimizations,
but the X86 backend isn't ready for this when X has a single use. For example,
this can disable load folding.
This is inching towards resolving PR6627.
llvm-svn: 130238
On x86 this allows to fold a load into the cmp, greatly reducing register pressure.
movzbl (%rdi), %eax
cmpl $47, %eax
->
cmpb $47, (%rdi)
This shaves 8k off gcc.o on i386. I'll leave applying the patch in README.txt to Chris :)
llvm-svn: 130005
1. Inform users of ADDEs with two 0 operands that it never sets carry
2. Fold other ADDs or ADDCs into the ADDE if possible
It would be neat if we could do the same thing for SETCC+ADD eventually, but we can't do that in target independent code.
llvm-svn: 126557
This makes the job of the later optzn passes easier, allowing the vast amount of
icmp transforms to chew on it.
We transform 840 switches in gcc.c, leading to a 16k byte shrink of the resulting
binary on i386-linux.
The testcase from README.txt now compiles into
decl %edi
cmpl $3, %edi
sbbl %eax, %eax
andl $1, %eax
ret
llvm-svn: 124724
This happens all the time when a smul is promoted to a larger type.
On x86-64 we now compile "int test(int x) { return x/10; }" into
movslq %edi, %rax
imulq $1717986919, %rax, %rax
movq %rax, %rcx
shrq $63, %rcx
sarq $34, %rax <- used to be "shrq $32, %rax; sarl $2, %eax"
addl %ecx, %eax
This fires 96 times in gcc.c on x86-64.
llvm-svn: 124559
Tanya Lattner