to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Original r297566 is splitted into two parts.
This is part one, which adds "RUN" command for test cases.
Unit/arm/call_apsr.S is updated to support thumb1.
It also fixes a bug in arm/aeabi_uldivmod_test.c
gcc_personality_test is XFAILED as the framework cannot handle it so far.
cpu_model_test is also XFAILED for now as it is expected to return non-zero.
TODO: A few tests are XFAILed for armhf and aarch64.
We need further investigating. [1,2] Tracks the issue.
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32260
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32261
Reviewers: rengolin, compnerd, jroelofs, erik.pilkington, arphaman
Reviewed By: jroelofs
Subscribers: jroelofs, aemerson, srhines, nemanjai, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30802
llvm-svn: 298339
Summary:
This patch implements a initial support of lit test for builtins.
Unit/arm/call_apsr.S is updated to support thumb1.
It also fixes a bug in arm/aeabi_uldivmod_test.c
gcc_personality_test is XFAILED as the framework cannot handle it so far.
cpu_model_test is also XFAILED for now as it is expected to return non-zero.
Reviewers: rengolin, compnerd, jroelofs, erik.pilkington, arphaman
Reviewed By: jroelofs
Subscribers: jroelofs, aemerson, srhines, nemanjai, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30802
llvm-svn: 297566
Negative numbers were handled properly initially, but got broken
during addressing review, so none of them did actually work. Issues:
* Wrong negation.
* Wrong exponent calculation.
llvm-svn: 243746
Summary:
This makes their local declarations match their definitions for ARM targets,
where they have a different calling convention.
This really only affects functions that use floating point types (since the
runtime functions use soft-float, and some targets may default to hard-float)
but it seemed good to make it uniform and do the int-only ones too.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9062
llvm-svn: 235722
Chandler Carruth